社会实践方法如何改善政府支持的中小企业脱碳计划

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Aoife Maher , Francesca Boyd , Steffen Böhm
{"title":"社会实践方法如何改善政府支持的中小企业脱碳计划","authors":"Aoife Maher ,&nbsp;Francesca Boyd ,&nbsp;Steffen Böhm","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ongoing scramble to reach net-zero has prompted many nations globally to implement targeted support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to decarbonise and enable participation in the just climate transition. Using social practice theory and Maréchal and Holzemer's ‘grips’ framework as conceptual lenses, we consider the role and efficacy of policy interventions in driving the SME net-zero transition. This study examines the available evidence on how government-supported initiatives, particularly within a UK case study context, aid SMEs to understand, measure, and act on carbon emissions. Policy efforts to support SMEs towards decarbonisation are evaluated through a systematic PRISMA literature review of academic literature and by using a novel approach towards a systematic grey literature review. Review findings reveal that: 1) overreliance on evidence from quantitative surveys, which are largely decoupled from interventions, and small-sample qualitative approaches has limited our understanding of the impact of government-supported initiatives' progress towards decarbonisation; 2) despite limited evidence of the efficacy of recent intervention design, decarbonisation initiatives continue to rely on a narrow suite of information and behaviour change tools, rather than robust, practice-orientated interventions to support a diverse SME population; 3) disconnection between policy design and research design discourages medium- to long-term evaluation of the impact of interventions; 4) by using the ‘grips’ framework as a conceptual guide, this study offers a reimagining of government-supported initiatives as systemic rather than individualistic to support SMEs to embed decarbonisation activity within everyday practices, in order to create enduring, meaningful progress towards net-zero.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104301"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How a social practice approach could improve government-supported decarbonisation initiatives for small and medium-sized enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Aoife Maher ,&nbsp;Francesca Boyd ,&nbsp;Steffen Böhm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ongoing scramble to reach net-zero has prompted many nations globally to implement targeted support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to decarbonise and enable participation in the just climate transition. Using social practice theory and Maréchal and Holzemer's ‘grips’ framework as conceptual lenses, we consider the role and efficacy of policy interventions in driving the SME net-zero transition. This study examines the available evidence on how government-supported initiatives, particularly within a UK case study context, aid SMEs to understand, measure, and act on carbon emissions. Policy efforts to support SMEs towards decarbonisation are evaluated through a systematic PRISMA literature review of academic literature and by using a novel approach towards a systematic grey literature review. Review findings reveal that: 1) overreliance on evidence from quantitative surveys, which are largely decoupled from interventions, and small-sample qualitative approaches has limited our understanding of the impact of government-supported initiatives' progress towards decarbonisation; 2) despite limited evidence of the efficacy of recent intervention design, decarbonisation initiatives continue to rely on a narrow suite of information and behaviour change tools, rather than robust, practice-orientated interventions to support a diverse SME population; 3) disconnection between policy design and research design discourages medium- to long-term evaluation of the impact of interventions; 4) by using the ‘grips’ framework as a conceptual guide, this study offers a reimagining of government-supported initiatives as systemic rather than individualistic to support SMEs to embed decarbonisation activity within everyday practices, in order to create enduring, meaningful progress towards net-zero.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为实现净零排放而进行的持续争夺促使全球许多国家对中小企业(sme)实施有针对性的支持,以实现脱碳,并使其能够参与公正的气候转型。利用社会实践理论和marsamchal和Holzemer的“抓握”框架作为概念透镜,我们考虑了政策干预在推动中小企业净零转型中的作用和有效性。本研究考察了现有证据,特别是在英国案例研究背景下,政府支持的举措如何帮助中小企业理解、衡量和采取碳排放行动。通过对学术文献进行系统的PRISMA文献综述,并采用一种新的方法进行系统的灰色文献综述,对支持中小企业脱碳的政策努力进行评估。审查结果表明:1)过度依赖定量调查的证据,这些证据在很大程度上与干预措施脱钩,以及小样本定性方法限制了我们对政府支持的举措对脱碳进展的影响的理解;2)尽管近期干预设计的有效性证据有限,但脱碳举措仍然依赖于一套狭窄的信息和行为改变工具,而不是强有力的、以实践为导向的干预措施,以支持多样化的中小企业群体;3)政策设计与研究设计之间的脱节阻碍了对干预措施影响的中长期评估;4)通过使用“把握”框架作为概念指南,本研究重新构想了政府支持的倡议,将其作为系统性的,而不是个人主义的,以支持中小企业将脱碳活动纳入日常实践,从而创造持久的、有意义的净零进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How a social practice approach could improve government-supported decarbonisation initiatives for small and medium-sized enterprises
The ongoing scramble to reach net-zero has prompted many nations globally to implement targeted support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to decarbonise and enable participation in the just climate transition. Using social practice theory and Maréchal and Holzemer's ‘grips’ framework as conceptual lenses, we consider the role and efficacy of policy interventions in driving the SME net-zero transition. This study examines the available evidence on how government-supported initiatives, particularly within a UK case study context, aid SMEs to understand, measure, and act on carbon emissions. Policy efforts to support SMEs towards decarbonisation are evaluated through a systematic PRISMA literature review of academic literature and by using a novel approach towards a systematic grey literature review. Review findings reveal that: 1) overreliance on evidence from quantitative surveys, which are largely decoupled from interventions, and small-sample qualitative approaches has limited our understanding of the impact of government-supported initiatives' progress towards decarbonisation; 2) despite limited evidence of the efficacy of recent intervention design, decarbonisation initiatives continue to rely on a narrow suite of information and behaviour change tools, rather than robust, practice-orientated interventions to support a diverse SME population; 3) disconnection between policy design and research design discourages medium- to long-term evaluation of the impact of interventions; 4) by using the ‘grips’ framework as a conceptual guide, this study offers a reimagining of government-supported initiatives as systemic rather than individualistic to support SMEs to embed decarbonisation activity within everyday practices, in order to create enduring, meaningful progress towards net-zero.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信