{"title":"社会实践方法如何改善政府支持的中小企业脱碳计划","authors":"Aoife Maher , Francesca Boyd , Steffen Böhm","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ongoing scramble to reach net-zero has prompted many nations globally to implement targeted support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to decarbonise and enable participation in the just climate transition. Using social practice theory and Maréchal and Holzemer's ‘grips’ framework as conceptual lenses, we consider the role and efficacy of policy interventions in driving the SME net-zero transition. This study examines the available evidence on how government-supported initiatives, particularly within a UK case study context, aid SMEs to understand, measure, and act on carbon emissions. Policy efforts to support SMEs towards decarbonisation are evaluated through a systematic PRISMA literature review of academic literature and by using a novel approach towards a systematic grey literature review. Review findings reveal that: 1) overreliance on evidence from quantitative surveys, which are largely decoupled from interventions, and small-sample qualitative approaches has limited our understanding of the impact of government-supported initiatives' progress towards decarbonisation; 2) despite limited evidence of the efficacy of recent intervention design, decarbonisation initiatives continue to rely on a narrow suite of information and behaviour change tools, rather than robust, practice-orientated interventions to support a diverse SME population; 3) disconnection between policy design and research design discourages medium- to long-term evaluation of the impact of interventions; 4) by using the ‘grips’ framework as a conceptual guide, this study offers a reimagining of government-supported initiatives as systemic rather than individualistic to support SMEs to embed decarbonisation activity within everyday practices, in order to create enduring, meaningful progress towards net-zero.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104301"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How a social practice approach could improve government-supported decarbonisation initiatives for small and medium-sized enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Aoife Maher , Francesca Boyd , Steffen Böhm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ongoing scramble to reach net-zero has prompted many nations globally to implement targeted support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to decarbonise and enable participation in the just climate transition. Using social practice theory and Maréchal and Holzemer's ‘grips’ framework as conceptual lenses, we consider the role and efficacy of policy interventions in driving the SME net-zero transition. This study examines the available evidence on how government-supported initiatives, particularly within a UK case study context, aid SMEs to understand, measure, and act on carbon emissions. Policy efforts to support SMEs towards decarbonisation are evaluated through a systematic PRISMA literature review of academic literature and by using a novel approach towards a systematic grey literature review. Review findings reveal that: 1) overreliance on evidence from quantitative surveys, which are largely decoupled from interventions, and small-sample qualitative approaches has limited our understanding of the impact of government-supported initiatives' progress towards decarbonisation; 2) despite limited evidence of the efficacy of recent intervention design, decarbonisation initiatives continue to rely on a narrow suite of information and behaviour change tools, rather than robust, practice-orientated interventions to support a diverse SME population; 3) disconnection between policy design and research design discourages medium- to long-term evaluation of the impact of interventions; 4) by using the ‘grips’ framework as a conceptual guide, this study offers a reimagining of government-supported initiatives as systemic rather than individualistic to support SMEs to embed decarbonisation activity within everyday practices, in order to create enduring, meaningful progress towards net-zero.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How a social practice approach could improve government-supported decarbonisation initiatives for small and medium-sized enterprises
The ongoing scramble to reach net-zero has prompted many nations globally to implement targeted support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to decarbonise and enable participation in the just climate transition. Using social practice theory and Maréchal and Holzemer's ‘grips’ framework as conceptual lenses, we consider the role and efficacy of policy interventions in driving the SME net-zero transition. This study examines the available evidence on how government-supported initiatives, particularly within a UK case study context, aid SMEs to understand, measure, and act on carbon emissions. Policy efforts to support SMEs towards decarbonisation are evaluated through a systematic PRISMA literature review of academic literature and by using a novel approach towards a systematic grey literature review. Review findings reveal that: 1) overreliance on evidence from quantitative surveys, which are largely decoupled from interventions, and small-sample qualitative approaches has limited our understanding of the impact of government-supported initiatives' progress towards decarbonisation; 2) despite limited evidence of the efficacy of recent intervention design, decarbonisation initiatives continue to rely on a narrow suite of information and behaviour change tools, rather than robust, practice-orientated interventions to support a diverse SME population; 3) disconnection between policy design and research design discourages medium- to long-term evaluation of the impact of interventions; 4) by using the ‘grips’ framework as a conceptual guide, this study offers a reimagining of government-supported initiatives as systemic rather than individualistic to support SMEs to embed decarbonisation activity within everyday practices, in order to create enduring, meaningful progress towards net-zero.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.