基于过程的农民福利方法的有效性:随机多基线单例实验设计

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Greg Stynes , Alison Stapleton , Barbara Moore , Tomás Russell , Martin O'Connor , Noel Richardson , Francisco J. Ruiz , Louise McHugh
{"title":"基于过程的农民福利方法的有效性:随机多基线单例实验设计","authors":"Greg Stynes ,&nbsp;Alison Stapleton ,&nbsp;Barbara Moore ,&nbsp;Tomás Russell ,&nbsp;Martin O'Connor ,&nbsp;Noel Richardson ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Ruiz ,&nbsp;Louise McHugh","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Among farmers, mental health and suicide are noted concerns in the literature. Practical barriers, stigma and shame may impede engagement with support. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy offers a means of providing support to those experiencing mental health concerns. An evaluation of a six-session, online, individually facilitated intervention with six Irish farmers (age 39–69 years) was completed using a randomized, concurrent, multiple-baseline, single-case experimental design. Additional data on various mental health variables were gathered pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at three-month follow-up. Tau-U results based on responses (84 days) were significant for psychological flexibility for three participants and for stress for one participant. Between-case standardized mean difference suggested a significant, large increase for psychological flexibility and no significant change for stress. At least three participants made reliable improvements in depression, psychological flexibility, and internal shame, with percentage improvements in positive and negative processes of change, distress, vitality, and life satisfaction. Most individuals showed no improvements for stress, anxiety, or subjective wellbeing. Burnout increased over time. While the results of the evaluation are mixed, full attendance at sessions supports the feasibility of the intervention. Recommendations for future interventions and research are outlined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a process-based approach to farmer wellbeing: A randomized multiple baseline single-case experimental design\",\"authors\":\"Greg Stynes ,&nbsp;Alison Stapleton ,&nbsp;Barbara Moore ,&nbsp;Tomás Russell ,&nbsp;Martin O'Connor ,&nbsp;Noel Richardson ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Ruiz ,&nbsp;Louise McHugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Among farmers, mental health and suicide are noted concerns in the literature. Practical barriers, stigma and shame may impede engagement with support. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy offers a means of providing support to those experiencing mental health concerns. An evaluation of a six-session, online, individually facilitated intervention with six Irish farmers (age 39–69 years) was completed using a randomized, concurrent, multiple-baseline, single-case experimental design. Additional data on various mental health variables were gathered pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at three-month follow-up. Tau-U results based on responses (84 days) were significant for psychological flexibility for three participants and for stress for one participant. Between-case standardized mean difference suggested a significant, large increase for psychological flexibility and no significant change for stress. At least three participants made reliable improvements in depression, psychological flexibility, and internal shame, with percentage improvements in positive and negative processes of change, distress, vitality, and life satisfaction. Most individuals showed no improvements for stress, anxiety, or subjective wellbeing. Burnout increased over time. While the results of the evaluation are mixed, full attendance at sessions supports the feasibility of the intervention. Recommendations for future interventions and research are outlined.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221214472500064X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221214472500064X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在农民中,心理健康和自杀是文献中值得关注的问题。实际障碍、污名化和羞耻感可能会阻碍人们获得支持。接受和承诺疗法为那些经历心理健康问题的人提供了一种支持手段。采用随机、并行、多基线、单例实验设计,对6名爱尔兰农民(39-69岁)进行了6次在线、单独促进干预的评估。在干预前、干预后和三个月的随访中收集了各种心理健康变量的额外数据。基于反应(84天)的Tau-U结果在3名参与者的心理灵活性和1名参与者的压力方面具有显著性。病例间标准化平均差异表明心理灵活性显著增加,压力无显著变化。至少有三名参与者在抑郁、心理灵活性和内在羞耻感方面取得了可靠的改善,在积极和消极的变化过程、痛苦、活力和生活满意度方面取得了百分比的改善。大多数人在压力、焦虑或主观幸福感方面没有任何改善。随着时间的推移,倦怠感也在增加。虽然评估的结果好坏参半,但会议的全员出席支持了干预措施的可行性。对今后的干预和研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a process-based approach to farmer wellbeing: A randomized multiple baseline single-case experimental design
Among farmers, mental health and suicide are noted concerns in the literature. Practical barriers, stigma and shame may impede engagement with support. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy offers a means of providing support to those experiencing mental health concerns. An evaluation of a six-session, online, individually facilitated intervention with six Irish farmers (age 39–69 years) was completed using a randomized, concurrent, multiple-baseline, single-case experimental design. Additional data on various mental health variables were gathered pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at three-month follow-up. Tau-U results based on responses (84 days) were significant for psychological flexibility for three participants and for stress for one participant. Between-case standardized mean difference suggested a significant, large increase for psychological flexibility and no significant change for stress. At least three participants made reliable improvements in depression, psychological flexibility, and internal shame, with percentage improvements in positive and negative processes of change, distress, vitality, and life satisfaction. Most individuals showed no improvements for stress, anxiety, or subjective wellbeing. Burnout increased over time. While the results of the evaluation are mixed, full attendance at sessions supports the feasibility of the intervention. Recommendations for future interventions and research are outlined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信