康复指南:狗和猫的新生儿复苏。证据和知识差距分析与治疗建议

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Manuel Boller, Jamie M. Burkitt-Creedon, Christopher G. Byers, Daniel J. Fletcher, Kate S. Farrell, Autumn P. Davidson, Suzanne Fricke, Giovanna Bassu, Sophie A. Grundy, Cheryl Lopate, Maria C. Veronesi, the RECOVER Newborn Resuscitation Domain Evidence Evaluators
{"title":"康复指南:狗和猫的新生儿复苏。证据和知识差距分析与治疗建议","authors":"Manuel Boller,&nbsp;Jamie M. Burkitt-Creedon,&nbsp;Christopher G. Byers,&nbsp;Daniel J. Fletcher,&nbsp;Kate S. Farrell,&nbsp;Autumn P. Davidson,&nbsp;Suzanne Fricke,&nbsp;Giovanna Bassu,&nbsp;Sophie A. Grundy,&nbsp;Cheryl Lopate,&nbsp;Maria C. Veronesi,&nbsp;the RECOVER Newborn Resuscitation Domain Evidence Evaluators","doi":"10.1111/vec.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically review the evidence on, to devise clinical recommendations for, and to identify critical knowledge gaps in resuscitation of newborn puppies and kittens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to newborn resuscitation following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate with the quality of evidence, risk–benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an evidence profile worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. Treatment recommendations underwent a modified Delphi consensus process and were then distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 2 weeks prior to finalization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency veterinary practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight questions pertaining to temperature management, respiratory and metabolic support, and CPR were addressed. Of the 59 treatment recommendations formulated, 21 concerned medications, 20 addressed respiratory measures, 20 provided guidance on CPR, and 3 related to temperature management. Taken together, the recommendations emphasize the importance of early administration of bag–mask ventilation in nonvigorous, severely bradycardic newborn puppies and kittens. Most recommendations are either expert opinion (<i>n</i> = 28) or based on very low quality of evidence (<i>n</i> = 26).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Significant uncertainty remains regarding most resuscitative interventions in newborn puppies and kittens at birth. However, through a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence and a consensus process that included considerations of feasibility, the resulting treatment recommendations lay the foundation for clear, actionable guidance in small animal newborn resuscitation. In addition, a list of prioritized knowledge gaps was identified to guide collaborative clinical research to overcome the significant lack of veterinary scientific data at present.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"35 S1","pages":"S3-S59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Evidence and Knowledge Gap Analysis With Treatment Recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Boller,&nbsp;Jamie M. Burkitt-Creedon,&nbsp;Christopher G. Byers,&nbsp;Daniel J. Fletcher,&nbsp;Kate S. Farrell,&nbsp;Autumn P. Davidson,&nbsp;Suzanne Fricke,&nbsp;Giovanna Bassu,&nbsp;Sophie A. Grundy,&nbsp;Cheryl Lopate,&nbsp;Maria C. Veronesi,&nbsp;the RECOVER Newborn Resuscitation Domain Evidence Evaluators\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To systematically review the evidence on, to devise clinical recommendations for, and to identify critical knowledge gaps in resuscitation of newborn puppies and kittens.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to newborn resuscitation following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate with the quality of evidence, risk–benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an evidence profile worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. Treatment recommendations underwent a modified Delphi consensus process and were then distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 2 weeks prior to finalization.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency veterinary practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-eight questions pertaining to temperature management, respiratory and metabolic support, and CPR were addressed. Of the 59 treatment recommendations formulated, 21 concerned medications, 20 addressed respiratory measures, 20 provided guidance on CPR, and 3 related to temperature management. Taken together, the recommendations emphasize the importance of early administration of bag–mask ventilation in nonvigorous, severely bradycardic newborn puppies and kittens. Most recommendations are either expert opinion (<i>n</i> = 28) or based on very low quality of evidence (<i>n</i> = 26).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Significant uncertainty remains regarding most resuscitative interventions in newborn puppies and kittens at birth. However, through a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence and a consensus process that included considerations of feasibility, the resulting treatment recommendations lay the foundation for clear, actionable guidance in small animal newborn resuscitation. In addition, a list of prioritized knowledge gaps was identified to guide collaborative clinical research to overcome the significant lack of veterinary scientific data at present.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"volume\":\"35 S1\",\"pages\":\"S3-S59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.70012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的系统回顾有关新生幼犬和小猫复苏的证据,制定临床建议,并确定关键的知识空白。设计采用分级推荐、评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法对新生儿复苏相关文献进行标准化、系统的评价。证据评估人员对优先问题进行了审查,领域主席和兽医复苏再评估运动(RECOVER)联合主席对研究结果进行了协调,以得出与证据质量、风险-收益关系和临床可行性相适应的治疗建议。这一过程采用针对每个问题的证据概要工作表来实施,其中包括介绍、对科学的共识、治疗建议、这些建议的理由以及重要的知识差距。治疗建议经过改进的德尔菲共识过程,然后在最终确定前两周分发给兽医专业人员征求意见。跨学科,国际合作的大学,专业和应急兽医实践。结果28个问题涉及到体温管理,呼吸和代谢支持和心肺复苏术。在制定的59项治疗建议中,21项涉及药物治疗,20项涉及呼吸措施,20项提供心肺复苏术指导,3项涉及体温管理。综上所述,这些建议强调了对无活力、严重心动过缓的新生幼犬和小猫早期进行袋罩通气的重要性。大多数建议要么是专家意见(n = 28),要么是基于非常低质量的证据(n = 26)。结论:大多数新生幼犬和小猫出生时的复苏干预措施仍存在显著的不确定性。然而,通过对证据的全面评估和包括可行性考虑在内的共识过程,得出的治疗建议为小动物新生儿复苏提供明确、可操作的指导奠定了基础。此外,还确定了一份优先知识缺口清单,以指导协作临床研究,以克服目前兽医科学数据的严重缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Evidence and Knowledge Gap Analysis With Treatment Recommendations

RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Evidence and Knowledge Gap Analysis With Treatment Recommendations

Objective

To systematically review the evidence on, to devise clinical recommendations for, and to identify critical knowledge gaps in resuscitation of newborn puppies and kittens.

Design

Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to newborn resuscitation following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate with the quality of evidence, risk–benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an evidence profile worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. Treatment recommendations underwent a modified Delphi consensus process and were then distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 2 weeks prior to finalization.

Setting

Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency veterinary practice.

Results

Twenty-eight questions pertaining to temperature management, respiratory and metabolic support, and CPR were addressed. Of the 59 treatment recommendations formulated, 21 concerned medications, 20 addressed respiratory measures, 20 provided guidance on CPR, and 3 related to temperature management. Taken together, the recommendations emphasize the importance of early administration of bag–mask ventilation in nonvigorous, severely bradycardic newborn puppies and kittens. Most recommendations are either expert opinion (n = 28) or based on very low quality of evidence (n = 26).

Conclusions

Significant uncertainty remains regarding most resuscitative interventions in newborn puppies and kittens at birth. However, through a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence and a consensus process that included considerations of feasibility, the resulting treatment recommendations lay the foundation for clear, actionable guidance in small animal newborn resuscitation. In addition, a list of prioritized knowledge gaps was identified to guide collaborative clinical research to overcome the significant lack of veterinary scientific data at present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信