科学的本质是包容的:LGBTQ+本科STEM学生在追求行星科学方面的经历的定性研究

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Michelle A. Stage, Orianna D. Carvalho, Mollie A. Ruben
{"title":"科学的本质是包容的:LGBTQ+本科STEM学生在追求行星科学方面的经历的定性研究","authors":"Michelle A. Stage,&nbsp;Orianna D. Carvalho,&nbsp;Mollie A. Ruben","doi":"10.1111/asap.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diversity is essential for fostering innovation and improving organizational performance. Yet, it remains undervalued in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, leading to higher rates of mental health issues, burnout, and attrition among marginalized groups. This study aimed to examine the facilitators and barriers affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) STEM students, particularly those pursuing careers with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), using an intersectionality framework. The study recruited (<i>N</i> = 15) LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students who were guided through semi-structured interviews carried out via Zoom. Thematic analysis revealed three major facilitator themes focused on supportive familial and academic relationships, institutional symbols of inclusion, and individual strengths enhancing students' sense of belonging and career aspirations. Conversely, four major barrier themes focused on unsupportive interpersonal interactions, identity management stressors, stigma related to gender and sexual identity, and structural barriers contributing to exclusion and marginalization. Policy implications emphasize the importance of reinforcing diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) commitments, actively opposing discriminatory laws, and developing mentorship programs. NASA's continued commitment to DEIA is vital for creating an innovative STEM workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nature of science is inclusive: A qualitative study of LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students’ experiences in pursuing planetary sciences\",\"authors\":\"Michelle A. Stage,&nbsp;Orianna D. Carvalho,&nbsp;Mollie A. Ruben\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asap.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Diversity is essential for fostering innovation and improving organizational performance. Yet, it remains undervalued in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, leading to higher rates of mental health issues, burnout, and attrition among marginalized groups. This study aimed to examine the facilitators and barriers affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) STEM students, particularly those pursuing careers with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), using an intersectionality framework. The study recruited (<i>N</i> = 15) LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students who were guided through semi-structured interviews carried out via Zoom. Thematic analysis revealed three major facilitator themes focused on supportive familial and academic relationships, institutional symbols of inclusion, and individual strengths enhancing students' sense of belonging and career aspirations. Conversely, four major barrier themes focused on unsupportive interpersonal interactions, identity management stressors, stigma related to gender and sexual identity, and structural barriers contributing to exclusion and marginalization. Policy implications emphasize the importance of reinforcing diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) commitments, actively opposing discriminatory laws, and developing mentorship programs. NASA's continued commitment to DEIA is vital for creating an innovative STEM workforce.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多样性对于促进创新和提高组织绩效至关重要。然而,在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域,它仍然被低估,导致边缘化群体中心理健康问题、倦怠和人员流失的比例更高。本研究旨在使用交叉性框架,研究影响女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ+) STEM学生的因素和障碍,特别是那些在美国国家航空航天局(NASA)工作的学生。该研究招募了(N = 15) LGBTQ+ STEM本科学生,他们通过Zoom进行了半结构化访谈。主题分析揭示了三个主要的促进因素主题,分别是支持性的家庭和学术关系、包容性的制度象征以及增强学生归属感和职业抱负的个人优势。相反,四个主要障碍主题侧重于不支持的人际互动、身份管理压力源、与性别和性身份相关的耻辱以及导致排斥和边缘化的结构性障碍。政策含义强调了加强多样性、公平、包容和可及性(DEIA)承诺、积极反对歧视性法律和制定指导计划的重要性。NASA对DEIA的持续承诺对于创建创新型STEM劳动力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The nature of science is inclusive: A qualitative study of LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students’ experiences in pursuing planetary sciences

The nature of science is inclusive: A qualitative study of LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students’ experiences in pursuing planetary sciences

The nature of science is inclusive: A qualitative study of LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students’ experiences in pursuing planetary sciences

The nature of science is inclusive: A qualitative study of LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students’ experiences in pursuing planetary sciences

Diversity is essential for fostering innovation and improving organizational performance. Yet, it remains undervalued in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, leading to higher rates of mental health issues, burnout, and attrition among marginalized groups. This study aimed to examine the facilitators and barriers affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) STEM students, particularly those pursuing careers with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), using an intersectionality framework. The study recruited (N = 15) LGBTQ+ undergraduate STEM students who were guided through semi-structured interviews carried out via Zoom. Thematic analysis revealed three major facilitator themes focused on supportive familial and academic relationships, institutional symbols of inclusion, and individual strengths enhancing students' sense of belonging and career aspirations. Conversely, four major barrier themes focused on unsupportive interpersonal interactions, identity management stressors, stigma related to gender and sexual identity, and structural barriers contributing to exclusion and marginalization. Policy implications emphasize the importance of reinforcing diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) commitments, actively opposing discriminatory laws, and developing mentorship programs. NASA's continued commitment to DEIA is vital for creating an innovative STEM workforce.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信