无症状胆管结石患者行内窥镜手术后自行移除胆道支架预防胆管炎

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-08-23 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70194
Shinichi Nihei, Sho Hasegawa, Yu Honda, Yuma Yamazaki, Takeshi Iizuka, Yusuke Kurita, Kunihiro Hosono, Masato Yoneda, Kensuke Kubota, Atsushi Nakajima
{"title":"无症状胆管结石患者行内窥镜手术后自行移除胆道支架预防胆管炎","authors":"Shinichi Nihei,&nbsp;Sho Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yu Honda,&nbsp;Yuma Yamazaki,&nbsp;Takeshi Iizuka,&nbsp;Yusuke Kurita,&nbsp;Kunihiro Hosono,&nbsp;Masato Yoneda,&nbsp;Kensuke Kubota,&nbsp;Atsushi Nakajima","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the effectiveness of spontaneously dislodging biliary stent (SDBS) placement in preventing acute cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with asymptomatic bile duct stones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective, single-center study included 63 patients (mean age, 73 ± 11 years; 43 men) who underwent ERCP for asymptomatic bile duct stones at our institute between April 2022 and May 2024; they were categorized into the SDBS (33 patients) and non-stent (30 patients) groups. Stone removal was performed in all cases, and complete stone clearance was achieved. Post-procedure cholangitis was diagnosed based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018. The primary endpoint was post-procedural acute cholangitis on day one. Secondary endpoints included cholangitis-related factors, type of device used, procedure time, and adverse events other than cholangitis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with post-procedure cholangitis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant differences were observed in prior cholecystectomy, bile duct diameter, or the number of stones between the two groups. The overall incidence of post-procedure cholangitis was 17.4%. The incidence was significantly lower in the SDBS group than in the non-stent group (6% vs. 30%; <i>p =</i> 0.01). No significant differences were observed in procedure time, incidence of complications such as post-ERCP pancreatitis, or postoperative hospital stay between the SDBS and non-stent groups. Multivariate analysis identified the absence of an SDBS (odds ratio, 6.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–35.6, <i>p =</i> 0.04) as an independent factor associated with post-procedure cholangitis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SDBS placement may be effective in preventing cholangitis after ERCP in asymptomatic patients with bile duct stones.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70194","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of Cholangitis by Spontaneously Dislodging Biliary Stent After an Endoscopic Procedure in Patients With Asymptomatic Bile Duct Stones\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Nihei,&nbsp;Sho Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yu Honda,&nbsp;Yuma Yamazaki,&nbsp;Takeshi Iizuka,&nbsp;Yusuke Kurita,&nbsp;Kunihiro Hosono,&nbsp;Masato Yoneda,&nbsp;Kensuke Kubota,&nbsp;Atsushi Nakajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the effectiveness of spontaneously dislodging biliary stent (SDBS) placement in preventing acute cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with asymptomatic bile duct stones.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective, single-center study included 63 patients (mean age, 73 ± 11 years; 43 men) who underwent ERCP for asymptomatic bile duct stones at our institute between April 2022 and May 2024; they were categorized into the SDBS (33 patients) and non-stent (30 patients) groups. Stone removal was performed in all cases, and complete stone clearance was achieved. Post-procedure cholangitis was diagnosed based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018. The primary endpoint was post-procedural acute cholangitis on day one. Secondary endpoints included cholangitis-related factors, type of device used, procedure time, and adverse events other than cholangitis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with post-procedure cholangitis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No significant differences were observed in prior cholecystectomy, bile duct diameter, or the number of stones between the two groups. The overall incidence of post-procedure cholangitis was 17.4%. The incidence was significantly lower in the SDBS group than in the non-stent group (6% vs. 30%; <i>p =</i> 0.01). No significant differences were observed in procedure time, incidence of complications such as post-ERCP pancreatitis, or postoperative hospital stay between the SDBS and non-stent groups. Multivariate analysis identified the absence of an SDBS (odds ratio, 6.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–35.6, <i>p =</i> 0.04) as an independent factor associated with post-procedure cholangitis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>SDBS placement may be effective in preventing cholangitis after ERCP in asymptomatic patients with bile duct stones.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70194\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨自行移位胆道支架(SDBS)在预防无症状胆管结石患者内镜逆行胆管造影术(ERCP)后急性胆管炎中的应用效果。方法本回顾性单中心研究纳入63例患者(平均年龄73±11岁,男性43例),于2022年4月至2024年5月在我所接受ERCP治疗无症状胆管结石;将患者分为SDBS组(33例)和非支架组(30例)。所有病例均行结石清除术,结石完全清除。术后胆管炎是根据2018年东京指南诊断的。主要终点是术后第一天的急性胆管炎。次要终点包括胆管炎相关因素、使用的器械类型、手术时间和胆管炎以外的不良事件。进行多变量分析以确定与术后胆管炎相关的因素。结果两组患者术前胆囊切除术、胆管直径、结石数量均无显著差异。术后胆管炎的总发生率为17.4%。SDBS组的发生率明显低于非支架组(6% vs. 30%; p = 0.01)。SDBS组和非支架组在手术时间、ercp后胰腺炎等并发症发生率或术后住院时间方面均无显著差异。多因素分析发现,缺乏SDBS(优势比,6.09;95%可信区间,1.04-35.6,p = 0.04)是术后胆管炎相关的独立因素。结论在无症状胆管结石患者ERCP术后放置SDBS可有效预防胆管炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevention of Cholangitis by Spontaneously Dislodging Biliary Stent After an Endoscopic Procedure in Patients With Asymptomatic Bile Duct Stones

Prevention of Cholangitis by Spontaneously Dislodging Biliary Stent After an Endoscopic Procedure in Patients With Asymptomatic Bile Duct Stones

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of spontaneously dislodging biliary stent (SDBS) placement in preventing acute cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with asymptomatic bile duct stones.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included 63 patients (mean age, 73 ± 11 years; 43 men) who underwent ERCP for asymptomatic bile duct stones at our institute between April 2022 and May 2024; they were categorized into the SDBS (33 patients) and non-stent (30 patients) groups. Stone removal was performed in all cases, and complete stone clearance was achieved. Post-procedure cholangitis was diagnosed based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018. The primary endpoint was post-procedural acute cholangitis on day one. Secondary endpoints included cholangitis-related factors, type of device used, procedure time, and adverse events other than cholangitis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with post-procedure cholangitis.

Results

No significant differences were observed in prior cholecystectomy, bile duct diameter, or the number of stones between the two groups. The overall incidence of post-procedure cholangitis was 17.4%. The incidence was significantly lower in the SDBS group than in the non-stent group (6% vs. 30%; p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in procedure time, incidence of complications such as post-ERCP pancreatitis, or postoperative hospital stay between the SDBS and non-stent groups. Multivariate analysis identified the absence of an SDBS (odds ratio, 6.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–35.6, p = 0.04) as an independent factor associated with post-procedure cholangitis.

Conclusion

SDBS placement may be effective in preventing cholangitis after ERCP in asymptomatic patients with bile duct stones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信