多维供求关系视角下的城市公园布局公平性

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Lisu Chen , Peng Peng , Enyan Zhu , Huafeng Wu , Daolun Feng
{"title":"多维供求关系视角下的城市公园布局公平性","authors":"Lisu Chen ,&nbsp;Peng Peng ,&nbsp;Enyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Huafeng Wu ,&nbsp;Daolun Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of rapid urban expansion and population growth, spatial inequality between the supply and demand of urban parks has emerged as a key research area. Current research tends to concentrate on methodological studies of supply and demand, neglecting comprehensive multidimensional evaluation. This study constructed a multidimensional spatial inequality evaluation framework encompassing three dimensions—supply capacity, supply quality, and actual demand—from the perspective of multidimensional inequality. Taking the megacity of Shanghai, China as an example, the spatial inequality of Shanghai's parks was evaluated by employing the spatial superposition method to analyze multidimensional data, incorporating indicators such as park accessibility, service quality and capacity, and utilization frequency. The results indicated significant spatial inequality in the supply and demand of parks in Shanghai, with the central city exhibiting a more pronounced mismatch than the surrounding areas. This is primarily because larger parks are concentrated in central cities with higher urbanization levels, the supply of smaller parks is insufficient, and the overall distribution of parks is uneven, leading to a prominent contradiction between supply and demand. This framework can evaluate the supply and demand of urban parks more accurately from various perspectives than traditional methods, providing a scientific and systematic evaluation tool for urban planning and policymaking. For instance, when devising a city's housing policy, the tool, may be employed to evaluate housing conditions and affordability across communities. This enables policymakers to formulate targeted housing improvement plans, thereby enhancing living conditions, mitigating housing inequality, and rationally allocating public resources. In addition, as a global mega city, Shanghai is highly representative in terms of urban expansion and land resource supply and demand, and establishing an accurate framework of evaluation can provide references for other cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129016"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fairness of urban park layout from the perspective of multidimensional supply and demand relationship\",\"authors\":\"Lisu Chen ,&nbsp;Peng Peng ,&nbsp;Enyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Huafeng Wu ,&nbsp;Daolun Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the context of rapid urban expansion and population growth, spatial inequality between the supply and demand of urban parks has emerged as a key research area. Current research tends to concentrate on methodological studies of supply and demand, neglecting comprehensive multidimensional evaluation. This study constructed a multidimensional spatial inequality evaluation framework encompassing three dimensions—supply capacity, supply quality, and actual demand—from the perspective of multidimensional inequality. Taking the megacity of Shanghai, China as an example, the spatial inequality of Shanghai's parks was evaluated by employing the spatial superposition method to analyze multidimensional data, incorporating indicators such as park accessibility, service quality and capacity, and utilization frequency. The results indicated significant spatial inequality in the supply and demand of parks in Shanghai, with the central city exhibiting a more pronounced mismatch than the surrounding areas. This is primarily because larger parks are concentrated in central cities with higher urbanization levels, the supply of smaller parks is insufficient, and the overall distribution of parks is uneven, leading to a prominent contradiction between supply and demand. This framework can evaluate the supply and demand of urban parks more accurately from various perspectives than traditional methods, providing a scientific and systematic evaluation tool for urban planning and policymaking. For instance, when devising a city's housing policy, the tool, may be employed to evaluate housing conditions and affordability across communities. This enables policymakers to formulate targeted housing improvement plans, thereby enhancing living conditions, mitigating housing inequality, and rationally allocating public resources. In addition, as a global mega city, Shanghai is highly representative in terms of urban expansion and land resource supply and demand, and establishing an accurate framework of evaluation can provide references for other cities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 129016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003504\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在城市快速扩张和人口快速增长的背景下,城市公园的空间供需不平等问题已成为一个重要的研究领域。目前的研究往往侧重于供求关系的方法学研究,而忽视了多方面的综合评价。本研究从多维不平等的视角构建了包含供给能力、供给质量和实际需求三个维度的多维空间不平等评价框架。以特大城市上海为例,采用空间叠加法对多维数据进行分析,纳入公园可达性、服务质量和容量、利用频率等指标,评价上海公园的空间不平等。研究结果表明,上海市公园资源供需存在明显的空间不均衡,中心城区比周边地区的不匹配更为明显。这主要是因为较大的公园集中在城市化水平较高的中心城市,较小的公园供给不足,公园整体分布不均衡,导致供需矛盾突出。与传统方法相比,该框架可以从多个角度更准确地评估城市公园的供给和需求,为城市规划和政策制定提供科学、系统的评估工具。例如,在制定城市住房政策时,可以使用该工具来评估各个社区的住房条件和负担能力。这使决策者能够制定有针对性的住房改善计划,从而改善居住条件,缓解住房不平等,合理配置公共资源。此外,上海作为全球特大城市,在城市扩张和土地资源供需方面具有很强的代表性,建立准确的评价框架可以为其他城市提供借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fairness of urban park layout from the perspective of multidimensional supply and demand relationship
In the context of rapid urban expansion and population growth, spatial inequality between the supply and demand of urban parks has emerged as a key research area. Current research tends to concentrate on methodological studies of supply and demand, neglecting comprehensive multidimensional evaluation. This study constructed a multidimensional spatial inequality evaluation framework encompassing three dimensions—supply capacity, supply quality, and actual demand—from the perspective of multidimensional inequality. Taking the megacity of Shanghai, China as an example, the spatial inequality of Shanghai's parks was evaluated by employing the spatial superposition method to analyze multidimensional data, incorporating indicators such as park accessibility, service quality and capacity, and utilization frequency. The results indicated significant spatial inequality in the supply and demand of parks in Shanghai, with the central city exhibiting a more pronounced mismatch than the surrounding areas. This is primarily because larger parks are concentrated in central cities with higher urbanization levels, the supply of smaller parks is insufficient, and the overall distribution of parks is uneven, leading to a prominent contradiction between supply and demand. This framework can evaluate the supply and demand of urban parks more accurately from various perspectives than traditional methods, providing a scientific and systematic evaluation tool for urban planning and policymaking. For instance, when devising a city's housing policy, the tool, may be employed to evaluate housing conditions and affordability across communities. This enables policymakers to formulate targeted housing improvement plans, thereby enhancing living conditions, mitigating housing inequality, and rationally allocating public resources. In addition, as a global mega city, Shanghai is highly representative in terms of urban expansion and land resource supply and demand, and establishing an accurate framework of evaluation can provide references for other cities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信