影响农村农民采用可持续农业做法的因素综合:范围审查

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Michael Madin , Katherine Nelson , Matthew Sanderson , Laura Moley
{"title":"影响农村农民采用可持续农业做法的因素综合:范围审查","authors":"Michael Madin ,&nbsp;Katherine Nelson ,&nbsp;Matthew Sanderson ,&nbsp;Laura Moley","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural regions are significant food producers, yet there are concerns about adoption of sustainable agriculture practices among rural farmers. Empirical studies show that a wide range of factors influence adoption of sustainable practices. We reviewed 83 studies on this subject to analyze which climatic, economic, socio-cultural, and environmental factors significantly influence adoption of sustainable practices. Our analysis found that most of the selected studies (82 %) considered socio-cultural and economic characteristics of farmers but neglected climatic and environmental factors. The influence of these factors on farmers' adoption likelihood varied by type of sustainable practice and study context. The results indicated that drought events, rising temperatures, higher income and wealth, perceived environmental benefits, presence of disease, poor soil fertility, higher education, access to extension services, strong social networks, and positive psychological attitudes showed significant positive influence on farmers' uptake of most studied sustainable practices. In contrast, limited access to credit and markets consistently served as barriers to adoption. Characteristics such as gender and household size showed correlations to adoption of some studied practices, although these results were more mixed and affected by study context. While our findings are similar to the results of previous reviews, our specific focus on rural areas across the globe suggests that the positive effects of gender, education, and adequate access to credit on adoption may be stronger in more rural or less developed regions. Our analysis further indicates that most adoption studies’ models assumed a discrete binary approach to assessing adoption decisions, which may exclude the ability to capture discontinuation or re-adoption among farmers. Therefore, adoption literature would benefit from alternative approaches such as multivariate path-dependent analysis, which is particularly important for modeling factors with interactive relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103853"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A synthesis of factors influencing sustainable agriculture practices adoption among rural farmers: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Michael Madin ,&nbsp;Katherine Nelson ,&nbsp;Matthew Sanderson ,&nbsp;Laura Moley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rural regions are significant food producers, yet there are concerns about adoption of sustainable agriculture practices among rural farmers. Empirical studies show that a wide range of factors influence adoption of sustainable practices. We reviewed 83 studies on this subject to analyze which climatic, economic, socio-cultural, and environmental factors significantly influence adoption of sustainable practices. Our analysis found that most of the selected studies (82 %) considered socio-cultural and economic characteristics of farmers but neglected climatic and environmental factors. The influence of these factors on farmers' adoption likelihood varied by type of sustainable practice and study context. The results indicated that drought events, rising temperatures, higher income and wealth, perceived environmental benefits, presence of disease, poor soil fertility, higher education, access to extension services, strong social networks, and positive psychological attitudes showed significant positive influence on farmers' uptake of most studied sustainable practices. In contrast, limited access to credit and markets consistently served as barriers to adoption. Characteristics such as gender and household size showed correlations to adoption of some studied practices, although these results were more mixed and affected by study context. While our findings are similar to the results of previous reviews, our specific focus on rural areas across the globe suggests that the positive effects of gender, education, and adequate access to credit on adoption may be stronger in more rural or less developed regions. Our analysis further indicates that most adoption studies’ models assumed a discrete binary approach to assessing adoption decisions, which may exclude the ability to capture discontinuation or re-adoption among farmers. Therefore, adoption literature would benefit from alternative approaches such as multivariate path-dependent analysis, which is particularly important for modeling factors with interactive relationships.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002943\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002943","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农村地区是重要的粮食生产地,但人们对农村农民采用可持续农业做法的问题感到担忧。实证研究表明,广泛的因素影响可持续做法的采用。我们回顾了83项关于这一主题的研究,以分析哪些气候、经济、社会文化和环境因素显著影响可持续实践的采用。我们的分析发现,大多数选定的研究(82%)考虑了农民的社会文化和经济特征,但忽视了气候和环境因素。这些因素对农民采用可能性的影响因可持续实践类型和研究背景而异。结果表明,干旱事件、气温上升、收入和财富增加、感知到的环境效益、疾病的存在、土壤肥力差、高等教育、获得推广服务、强大的社会网络和积极的心理态度对农民采用大多数研究的可持续做法产生了显著的积极影响。相比之下,获得信贷和市场的机会有限一直是采用新技术的障碍。性别和家庭规模等特征显示出与某些研究实践的采用相关,尽管这些结果更加混合,并受到研究背景的影响。虽然我们的研究结果与之前的评估结果相似,但我们对全球农村地区的特别关注表明,性别、教育和充分获得信贷对收养的积极影响可能在更多的农村或欠发达地区更为强烈。我们的分析进一步表明,大多数收养研究模型采用离散的二元方法来评估收养决策,这可能排除了农民停止或重新收养的能力。因此,采用文献将受益于其他方法,如多变量路径依赖分析,这对于具有交互关系的建模因素特别重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A synthesis of factors influencing sustainable agriculture practices adoption among rural farmers: A scoping review
Rural regions are significant food producers, yet there are concerns about adoption of sustainable agriculture practices among rural farmers. Empirical studies show that a wide range of factors influence adoption of sustainable practices. We reviewed 83 studies on this subject to analyze which climatic, economic, socio-cultural, and environmental factors significantly influence adoption of sustainable practices. Our analysis found that most of the selected studies (82 %) considered socio-cultural and economic characteristics of farmers but neglected climatic and environmental factors. The influence of these factors on farmers' adoption likelihood varied by type of sustainable practice and study context. The results indicated that drought events, rising temperatures, higher income and wealth, perceived environmental benefits, presence of disease, poor soil fertility, higher education, access to extension services, strong social networks, and positive psychological attitudes showed significant positive influence on farmers' uptake of most studied sustainable practices. In contrast, limited access to credit and markets consistently served as barriers to adoption. Characteristics such as gender and household size showed correlations to adoption of some studied practices, although these results were more mixed and affected by study context. While our findings are similar to the results of previous reviews, our specific focus on rural areas across the globe suggests that the positive effects of gender, education, and adequate access to credit on adoption may be stronger in more rural or less developed regions. Our analysis further indicates that most adoption studies’ models assumed a discrete binary approach to assessing adoption decisions, which may exclude the ability to capture discontinuation or re-adoption among farmers. Therefore, adoption literature would benefit from alternative approaches such as multivariate path-dependent analysis, which is particularly important for modeling factors with interactive relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信