能源转型政策对能源公平的影响:有效性评估与政策学习预测

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Wenqi Zhao , Mengfan He
{"title":"能源转型政策对能源公平的影响:有效性评估与政策学习预测","authors":"Wenqi Zhao ,&nbsp;Mengfan He","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the acceleration of the global energy transition, ensuring a just transition has become a pressing concern. However, empirical studies examining how energy transition policies influence urban energy justice remain limited, particularly in developing countries such as China. This study seeks to address this gap by evaluating the impact of China's New Energy Demonstration City (NEDC) policy on urban energy justice. Using panel data from 286 prefecture-level cities spanning 2011 to 2022, we employ the difference-in-differences method for our empirical analysis. The findings indicate that the NEDC policy has greatly enhanced energy justice in pilot cities. Specifically, the policy promotes energy justice by enhancing employment and development opportunities. In terms of employment, the policy facilitates a shift from informal labor to formal employment, which ensures more stable incomes and improved social security for workers. Regarding development, the policy drives industrial upgrading and technological innovation. This not only optimizes industrial structures but also advances new energy technologies by reducing costs and enabling clean energy solutions to expand into township markets, thereby extending the benefits of the energy transition to a broader population. Our analysis of heterogeneity demonstrates that the effect of the policy is significantly stronger in cities that are not reliant on natural resources, as well as in those experiencing fewer fiscal limitations. Moreover, we identify spatial spillover effects that follow an inverted U-shaped pattern, with the strongest impacts observed within a 150–200 km range. Finally, we estimate individual treatment effects at the city level through a policy learning analysis using Lasso and causal forests methods, providing insights into the selection of future pilot cities. By advancing the empirical understanding of energy justice, this paper provides critical observations into the simultaneous pursuit of energy transition and social equity objectives. Additionally, it provides a practical reference for other developing nations in designing inclusive energy transition policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 108132"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of energy transition policy on energy justice: An effectiveness evaluation and policy learning forecast\",\"authors\":\"Wenqi Zhao ,&nbsp;Mengfan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the acceleration of the global energy transition, ensuring a just transition has become a pressing concern. However, empirical studies examining how energy transition policies influence urban energy justice remain limited, particularly in developing countries such as China. This study seeks to address this gap by evaluating the impact of China's New Energy Demonstration City (NEDC) policy on urban energy justice. Using panel data from 286 prefecture-level cities spanning 2011 to 2022, we employ the difference-in-differences method for our empirical analysis. The findings indicate that the NEDC policy has greatly enhanced energy justice in pilot cities. Specifically, the policy promotes energy justice by enhancing employment and development opportunities. In terms of employment, the policy facilitates a shift from informal labor to formal employment, which ensures more stable incomes and improved social security for workers. Regarding development, the policy drives industrial upgrading and technological innovation. This not only optimizes industrial structures but also advances new energy technologies by reducing costs and enabling clean energy solutions to expand into township markets, thereby extending the benefits of the energy transition to a broader population. Our analysis of heterogeneity demonstrates that the effect of the policy is significantly stronger in cities that are not reliant on natural resources, as well as in those experiencing fewer fiscal limitations. Moreover, we identify spatial spillover effects that follow an inverted U-shaped pattern, with the strongest impacts observed within a 150–200 km range. Finally, we estimate individual treatment effects at the city level through a policy learning analysis using Lasso and causal forests methods, providing insights into the selection of future pilot cities. By advancing the empirical understanding of energy justice, this paper provides critical observations into the simultaneous pursuit of energy transition and social equity objectives. Additionally, it provides a practical reference for other developing nations in designing inclusive energy transition policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003294\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球能源转型进程的加快,如何实现能源的公正转型已成为当务之急。然而,关于能源转型政策如何影响城市能源公平的实证研究仍然有限,特别是在中国等发展中国家。本研究旨在通过评估中国新能源示范城市(NEDC)政策对城市能源公平的影响来解决这一差距。本文采用2011 - 2022年286个地级市的面板数据,采用差异中的差异法进行实证分析。研究结果表明,NEDC政策极大地促进了试点城市的能源公平。具体而言,该政策通过增加就业和发展机会来促进能源公平。在就业方面,该政策促进了从非正式劳动向正式就业的转变,这确保了工人更稳定的收入和更好的社会保障。在发展方面,政策推动产业升级和技术创新。这不仅优化了产业结构,而且通过降低成本和使清洁能源解决方案扩展到乡镇市场,推动了新能源技术的发展,从而使能源转型的好处惠及更广泛的人群。我们对异质性的分析表明,在不依赖自然资源的城市以及财政限制较少的城市,该政策的效果明显更强。此外,我们发现空间溢出效应遵循倒u型模式,在150-200公里范围内的影响最大。最后,通过使用Lasso和因果森林方法的政策学习分析,我们估计了城市层面的个别治疗效果,为未来试点城市的选择提供了见解。通过推进对能源正义的实证理解,本文对能源转型和社会公平目标的同时追求提供了批判性的观察。为其他发展中国家制定包容性能源转型政策提供了实践参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of energy transition policy on energy justice: An effectiveness evaluation and policy learning forecast
With the acceleration of the global energy transition, ensuring a just transition has become a pressing concern. However, empirical studies examining how energy transition policies influence urban energy justice remain limited, particularly in developing countries such as China. This study seeks to address this gap by evaluating the impact of China's New Energy Demonstration City (NEDC) policy on urban energy justice. Using panel data from 286 prefecture-level cities spanning 2011 to 2022, we employ the difference-in-differences method for our empirical analysis. The findings indicate that the NEDC policy has greatly enhanced energy justice in pilot cities. Specifically, the policy promotes energy justice by enhancing employment and development opportunities. In terms of employment, the policy facilitates a shift from informal labor to formal employment, which ensures more stable incomes and improved social security for workers. Regarding development, the policy drives industrial upgrading and technological innovation. This not only optimizes industrial structures but also advances new energy technologies by reducing costs and enabling clean energy solutions to expand into township markets, thereby extending the benefits of the energy transition to a broader population. Our analysis of heterogeneity demonstrates that the effect of the policy is significantly stronger in cities that are not reliant on natural resources, as well as in those experiencing fewer fiscal limitations. Moreover, we identify spatial spillover effects that follow an inverted U-shaped pattern, with the strongest impacts observed within a 150–200 km range. Finally, we estimate individual treatment effects at the city level through a policy learning analysis using Lasso and causal forests methods, providing insights into the selection of future pilot cities. By advancing the empirical understanding of energy justice, this paper provides critical observations into the simultaneous pursuit of energy transition and social equity objectives. Additionally, it provides a practical reference for other developing nations in designing inclusive energy transition policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信