Isabelle Poirot Mazères (Professeur de droit public, Présidente de l’Association française de droit de la santé, Présidente du collège de déontologie du CHU de Toulouse)
{"title":"从医疗技术和实践评估基金会到卫生高级当局:卫生行为和卫生产品评估的体制演变","authors":"Isabelle Poirot Mazères (Professeur de droit public, Présidente de l’Association française de droit de la santé, Présidente du collège de déontologie du CHU de Toulouse)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>If the evaluation of the quality of health procedures and products as well as the measurement of the relevance of reimbursement by health insurance are constituent dimensions of the health system, they have only been acquired at the end of an evolution which has seen the gradual erasure of medical power and the parallel affirmation of expertise other than clinical, particularly medico-economic. Since 1986, several institutions responsible for evaluation have succeeded one another, with different statuses and increasingly broad missions, from the evaluation of professional acts or the formulation of clinical practices guidelines to the certification of health establishments, social and medico social. It is currently the High Health Authority which assumes this central role through which it contributes in this area of evaluation and standardization, to “the regulation of the health system through quality and efficiency”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2025 193","pages":"Pages 101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De la fondation pour l’évaluation des techniques et pratiques médicales à la Haute Autorité de santé : l’évolution institutionnelle de l’évaluation des actes et des produits de santé\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Poirot Mazères (Professeur de droit public, Présidente de l’Association française de droit de la santé, Présidente du collège de déontologie du CHU de Toulouse)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>If the evaluation of the quality of health procedures and products as well as the measurement of the relevance of reimbursement by health insurance are constituent dimensions of the health system, they have only been acquired at the end of an evolution which has seen the gradual erasure of medical power and the parallel affirmation of expertise other than clinical, particularly medico-economic. Since 1986, several institutions responsible for evaluation have succeeded one another, with different statuses and increasingly broad missions, from the evaluation of professional acts or the formulation of clinical practices guidelines to the certification of health establishments, social and medico social. It is currently the High Health Authority which assumes this central role through which it contributes in this area of evaluation and standardization, to “the regulation of the health system through quality and efficiency”.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2025 193\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
De la fondation pour l’évaluation des techniques et pratiques médicales à la Haute Autorité de santé : l’évolution institutionnelle de l’évaluation des actes et des produits de santé
If the evaluation of the quality of health procedures and products as well as the measurement of the relevance of reimbursement by health insurance are constituent dimensions of the health system, they have only been acquired at the end of an evolution which has seen the gradual erasure of medical power and the parallel affirmation of expertise other than clinical, particularly medico-economic. Since 1986, several institutions responsible for evaluation have succeeded one another, with different statuses and increasingly broad missions, from the evaluation of professional acts or the formulation of clinical practices guidelines to the certification of health establishments, social and medico social. It is currently the High Health Authority which assumes this central role through which it contributes in this area of evaluation and standardization, to “the regulation of the health system through quality and efficiency”.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues