{"title":"纳米流体用于先进的热管理:性能、成本和环境影响的多标准审查","authors":"Hamid-Reza Bahrami , Omid Allahdadi , Hamid Saffari","doi":"10.1016/j.rinma.2025.100753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nanofluids—engineered suspensions of nanoparticles in conventional fluids—have emerged as next-generation coolants due to their exceptional thermal properties. This review synthesizes recent progress in nanofluid research with a multi-criteria evaluation of thermophysical performance, cost-efficiency, and environmental impacts. Carbon-based nanofluids, particularly graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), dominate current research (36 %) owing to their ultrahigh thermal conductivities (∼4000–6000 W/m·K) and favorable dispersion stability. In contrast, metal-based (28 %) and metal oxide-based (24 %) nanofluids offer a trade-off between performance and affordability, with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (44 %) emerging as the most studied oxide. Hybrid nanofluids, although representing only 12 % of studies, demonstrate synergistic thermal enhancements—boosting thermal conductivity up to 42.7 % and reducing peak battery temperatures by as much as 26.4 % in advanced battery thermal management systems. Despite their performance gains, nanofluids face economic and operational challenges. Costs range widely—from $180 for 4L of 2 % Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanofluid to $85,000 for gold-based formulations. Viscosity models show that even small increases in nanoparticle concentration significantly elevate flow resistance, demanding greater pumping power. Environmental concerns remain significant, as certain nanoparticles commonly used in thermal applications—such as Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Ni—have extremely low reference dose thresholds (e.g., <0.01 mg/kg/day), indicating that even minimal exposure could pose toxicological risks to human health and the environment. A nanoparticle scoring framework integrating thermal performance, cost, and environmental impact identifies graphene and low-grade MWCNTs as optimal additives. This review concludes that while nanofluids hold transformative potential for energy, electronics, and transportation sectors, further efforts are required to enhance their economic viability, environmental safety, and long-term stability for widespread industrial adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101087,"journal":{"name":"Results in Materials","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100753"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nanofluids for advanced thermal management: A multi-criteria review of performance, cost, and environmental impacts\",\"authors\":\"Hamid-Reza Bahrami , Omid Allahdadi , Hamid Saffari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rinma.2025.100753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nanofluids—engineered suspensions of nanoparticles in conventional fluids—have emerged as next-generation coolants due to their exceptional thermal properties. This review synthesizes recent progress in nanofluid research with a multi-criteria evaluation of thermophysical performance, cost-efficiency, and environmental impacts. Carbon-based nanofluids, particularly graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), dominate current research (36 %) owing to their ultrahigh thermal conductivities (∼4000–6000 W/m·K) and favorable dispersion stability. In contrast, metal-based (28 %) and metal oxide-based (24 %) nanofluids offer a trade-off between performance and affordability, with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (44 %) emerging as the most studied oxide. Hybrid nanofluids, although representing only 12 % of studies, demonstrate synergistic thermal enhancements—boosting thermal conductivity up to 42.7 % and reducing peak battery temperatures by as much as 26.4 % in advanced battery thermal management systems. Despite their performance gains, nanofluids face economic and operational challenges. Costs range widely—from $180 for 4L of 2 % Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanofluid to $85,000 for gold-based formulations. Viscosity models show that even small increases in nanoparticle concentration significantly elevate flow resistance, demanding greater pumping power. Environmental concerns remain significant, as certain nanoparticles commonly used in thermal applications—such as Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Ni—have extremely low reference dose thresholds (e.g., <0.01 mg/kg/day), indicating that even minimal exposure could pose toxicological risks to human health and the environment. A nanoparticle scoring framework integrating thermal performance, cost, and environmental impact identifies graphene and low-grade MWCNTs as optimal additives. This review concludes that while nanofluids hold transformative potential for energy, electronics, and transportation sectors, further efforts are required to enhance their economic viability, environmental safety, and long-term stability for widespread industrial adoption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Materials\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590048X25000986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590048X25000986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nanofluids for advanced thermal management: A multi-criteria review of performance, cost, and environmental impacts
Nanofluids—engineered suspensions of nanoparticles in conventional fluids—have emerged as next-generation coolants due to their exceptional thermal properties. This review synthesizes recent progress in nanofluid research with a multi-criteria evaluation of thermophysical performance, cost-efficiency, and environmental impacts. Carbon-based nanofluids, particularly graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), dominate current research (36 %) owing to their ultrahigh thermal conductivities (∼4000–6000 W/m·K) and favorable dispersion stability. In contrast, metal-based (28 %) and metal oxide-based (24 %) nanofluids offer a trade-off between performance and affordability, with Al2O3 (44 %) emerging as the most studied oxide. Hybrid nanofluids, although representing only 12 % of studies, demonstrate synergistic thermal enhancements—boosting thermal conductivity up to 42.7 % and reducing peak battery temperatures by as much as 26.4 % in advanced battery thermal management systems. Despite their performance gains, nanofluids face economic and operational challenges. Costs range widely—from $180 for 4L of 2 % Al2O3 nanofluid to $85,000 for gold-based formulations. Viscosity models show that even small increases in nanoparticle concentration significantly elevate flow resistance, demanding greater pumping power. Environmental concerns remain significant, as certain nanoparticles commonly used in thermal applications—such as Al2O3 and Ni—have extremely low reference dose thresholds (e.g., <0.01 mg/kg/day), indicating that even minimal exposure could pose toxicological risks to human health and the environment. A nanoparticle scoring framework integrating thermal performance, cost, and environmental impact identifies graphene and low-grade MWCNTs as optimal additives. This review concludes that while nanofluids hold transformative potential for energy, electronics, and transportation sectors, further efforts are required to enhance their economic viability, environmental safety, and long-term stability for widespread industrial adoption.