Matthew E. Burton-Kelly, John E. Hunt, Neil W. Dotzenrod, John A. Templeton, Joshua G. Regorrah, Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa, Amanda J. Livers-Douglas, Wesley D. Peck, Kevin C. Connors, Nicholas A. Azzolina
{"title":"美国北达科他州碳储存项目中二氧化碳羽流稳定量化","authors":"Matthew E. Burton-Kelly, John E. Hunt, Neil W. Dotzenrod, John A. Templeton, Joshua G. Regorrah, Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa, Amanda J. Livers-Douglas, Wesley D. Peck, Kevin C. Connors, Nicholas A. Azzolina","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an approach for quantifying when injected carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) stabilizes pursuant to carbon capture and storage (CCS) project permitting and site closure requirements. The distribution of mobile-phase CO<sub>2</sub> (CO<sub>2</sub> plume) will evolve within the storage reservoir during and after injection through both physical and chemical trapping mechanisms. CCS policies generally agree that the CO<sub>2</sub> plume’s migratory behavior in post-injection should demonstrate nonendangerment to the environment but do not provide specific guidance on how to meet the definition of plume stabilization, generating some uncertainty for operators. Plume stability herein means the CO<sub>2</sub> plume 1) changes size minimally and predictably in the storage reservoir such that it will not cross key boundaries identified in the permit and 2) does not pose a threat to human health, underground sources of drinking water (USDWs), and the environment because of lateral migration to areas where leakage pathways may exist. Published literature on plume metrics was reviewed to determine which metric(s) may be most appropriate for determining CO<sub>2</sub> plume stability. A technical approach that defines plume stabilization by estimating the rate of change in the geographic footprint of the CO<sub>2</sub> plume with respect to time was developed and illustrated using a case study from North Dakota, USA, as a proposed solution for CCS operators to apply at the project permitting stage. Any prospective CCS operator may benefit from using the same approach to inform the selection of pore space lease and monitoring areas and develop post-injection site care plans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104456"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying CO2 plume stabilization at carbon storage projects, North Dakota, USA\",\"authors\":\"Matthew E. Burton-Kelly, John E. Hunt, Neil W. Dotzenrod, John A. Templeton, Joshua G. Regorrah, Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa, Amanda J. Livers-Douglas, Wesley D. Peck, Kevin C. Connors, Nicholas A. Azzolina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents an approach for quantifying when injected carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) stabilizes pursuant to carbon capture and storage (CCS) project permitting and site closure requirements. The distribution of mobile-phase CO<sub>2</sub> (CO<sub>2</sub> plume) will evolve within the storage reservoir during and after injection through both physical and chemical trapping mechanisms. CCS policies generally agree that the CO<sub>2</sub> plume’s migratory behavior in post-injection should demonstrate nonendangerment to the environment but do not provide specific guidance on how to meet the definition of plume stabilization, generating some uncertainty for operators. Plume stability herein means the CO<sub>2</sub> plume 1) changes size minimally and predictably in the storage reservoir such that it will not cross key boundaries identified in the permit and 2) does not pose a threat to human health, underground sources of drinking water (USDWs), and the environment because of lateral migration to areas where leakage pathways may exist. Published literature on plume metrics was reviewed to determine which metric(s) may be most appropriate for determining CO<sub>2</sub> plume stability. A technical approach that defines plume stabilization by estimating the rate of change in the geographic footprint of the CO<sub>2</sub> plume with respect to time was developed and illustrated using a case study from North Dakota, USA, as a proposed solution for CCS operators to apply at the project permitting stage. Any prospective CCS operator may benefit from using the same approach to inform the selection of pore space lease and monitoring areas and develop post-injection site care plans.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625001549\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625001549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying CO2 plume stabilization at carbon storage projects, North Dakota, USA
This study presents an approach for quantifying when injected carbon dioxide (CO2) stabilizes pursuant to carbon capture and storage (CCS) project permitting and site closure requirements. The distribution of mobile-phase CO2 (CO2 plume) will evolve within the storage reservoir during and after injection through both physical and chemical trapping mechanisms. CCS policies generally agree that the CO2 plume’s migratory behavior in post-injection should demonstrate nonendangerment to the environment but do not provide specific guidance on how to meet the definition of plume stabilization, generating some uncertainty for operators. Plume stability herein means the CO2 plume 1) changes size minimally and predictably in the storage reservoir such that it will not cross key boundaries identified in the permit and 2) does not pose a threat to human health, underground sources of drinking water (USDWs), and the environment because of lateral migration to areas where leakage pathways may exist. Published literature on plume metrics was reviewed to determine which metric(s) may be most appropriate for determining CO2 plume stability. A technical approach that defines plume stabilization by estimating the rate of change in the geographic footprint of the CO2 plume with respect to time was developed and illustrated using a case study from North Dakota, USA, as a proposed solution for CCS operators to apply at the project permitting stage. Any prospective CCS operator may benefit from using the same approach to inform the selection of pore space lease and monitoring areas and develop post-injection site care plans.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.