Runyao Huang , Junran Liu , Ange Song , Haoran Wu , Huiping Li , Jing Zhang , Hongtao Wang
{"title":"城市污水处理厂直接碳排放的边际减排成本:协作控制战略中优先清除污染或减少碳排放的见解","authors":"Runyao Huang , Junran Liu , Ange Song , Haoran Wu , Huiping Li , Jing Zhang , Hongtao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) possess potential on collaborative carbon-pollutant control, as they directly emit methane and nitrous oxide during biochemical treatment apart from indirect emissions. This study quantified marginal abatement costs (MACs) of direct emissions to characterize MWWTPs’ carbon-pollutant synergy degree and calculated carbon quota involving compliance state with China’s national discharge standard (GB 18918-2002) to identify priority on pollutant removal or carbon mitigation. Quantified from direct emissions measured in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) and total oxygen demand (TOD) removal amount, 4594 MWWTPs’ MACs showed variation (1.292∼2.612 kg TOD/kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) with scale as the dominant factor. In quota, carbon reduction potential (5.89 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) prominently outweighed pollutant removal demand (0.10 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq). Policy implications were proposed based on effects of scale economies and regional socioeconomic conditions. The evaluation framework of MACs and quota might also suit other countries’ MWWTPs to manage carbon footprint and guide low-carbon transformations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108564"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marginal abatement costs of direct carbon emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants: Insights for prioritizing pollution removal or carbon mitigation in collaborative control strategies\",\"authors\":\"Runyao Huang , Junran Liu , Ange Song , Haoran Wu , Huiping Li , Jing Zhang , Hongtao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) possess potential on collaborative carbon-pollutant control, as they directly emit methane and nitrous oxide during biochemical treatment apart from indirect emissions. This study quantified marginal abatement costs (MACs) of direct emissions to characterize MWWTPs’ carbon-pollutant synergy degree and calculated carbon quota involving compliance state with China’s national discharge standard (GB 18918-2002) to identify priority on pollutant removal or carbon mitigation. Quantified from direct emissions measured in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) and total oxygen demand (TOD) removal amount, 4594 MWWTPs’ MACs showed variation (1.292∼2.612 kg TOD/kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) with scale as the dominant factor. In quota, carbon reduction potential (5.89 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) prominently outweighed pollutant removal demand (0.10 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq). Policy implications were proposed based on effects of scale economies and regional socioeconomic conditions. The evaluation framework of MACs and quota might also suit other countries’ MWWTPs to manage carbon footprint and guide low-carbon transformations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004410\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
城市污水处理厂在生化处理过程中除间接排放外,直接排放甲烷和氧化亚氮,具有协同碳污染物控制的潜力。本研究量化了直接排放的边际减排成本(MACs)来表征MWWTPs的碳-污染物协同程度,并计算了涉及中国国家排放标准(GB 18918-2002)符合情况的碳配额,以确定污染物去除或碳减排的优先级。通过测量二氧化碳当量(CO2-eq)和总需氧量(TOD)去除率的直接排放量进行量化,4594座MWWTPs的MACs表现出变化(1.292 ~ 2.612 kg TOD/kg CO2-eq),规模是主要因素。在配额方面,碳减排潜力(589万公斤二氧化碳当量)显著超过污染物去除需求(10万公斤二氧化碳当量)。基于规模经济和区域社会经济条件的影响,提出了政策建议。MACs和配额的评估框架也可能适用于其他国家的mwwtp管理碳足迹和指导低碳转型。
Marginal abatement costs of direct carbon emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants: Insights for prioritizing pollution removal or carbon mitigation in collaborative control strategies
Municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) possess potential on collaborative carbon-pollutant control, as they directly emit methane and nitrous oxide during biochemical treatment apart from indirect emissions. This study quantified marginal abatement costs (MACs) of direct emissions to characterize MWWTPs’ carbon-pollutant synergy degree and calculated carbon quota involving compliance state with China’s national discharge standard (GB 18918-2002) to identify priority on pollutant removal or carbon mitigation. Quantified from direct emissions measured in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) and total oxygen demand (TOD) removal amount, 4594 MWWTPs’ MACs showed variation (1.292∼2.612 kg TOD/kg CO2-eq) with scale as the dominant factor. In quota, carbon reduction potential (5.89 million kg CO2-eq) prominently outweighed pollutant removal demand (0.10 million kg CO2-eq). Policy implications were proposed based on effects of scale economies and regional socioeconomic conditions. The evaluation framework of MACs and quota might also suit other countries’ MWWTPs to manage carbon footprint and guide low-carbon transformations.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.