Wei Zhang , Ziyi Zhao , Chengjiang Li , Jing Yang , Quande Qin
{"title":"基于生命周期预测模型的航空燃料可持续评价","authors":"Wei Zhang , Ziyi Zhao , Chengjiang Li , Jing Yang , Quande Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is crucial for the aviation industry to achieve its 2050 net-zero emissions target. The energy consumption, environmental impacts, and economic costs of SAF vary significantly due to feedstocks and processes. This study applies life cycle assessment to evaluate SAF routes’ energy-environment-economy (3E) performance; uses the STIRPAT model to quantify key factors influencing aviation emissions; and then integrates 3E indicators of SAF and factors affecting aviation emissions into a system dynamics model simulating impacts of SAF routes and blending ratios on aviation emissions. The results show that: different SAF routes have their advantages in terms of 3E; reducing aviation demand and improving aircraft fuel efficiency are the key emission reduction levers; and under the set scenario of blending ratios of SAF and conventional jet fuel in 2050, only blending 85 % and 100 % SAF can achieve the 65 % carbon emission reduction target required by the aviation industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108565"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of sustainable aviation fuel based on life cycle prediction model\",\"authors\":\"Wei Zhang , Ziyi Zhao , Chengjiang Li , Jing Yang , Quande Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is crucial for the aviation industry to achieve its 2050 net-zero emissions target. The energy consumption, environmental impacts, and economic costs of SAF vary significantly due to feedstocks and processes. This study applies life cycle assessment to evaluate SAF routes’ energy-environment-economy (3E) performance; uses the STIRPAT model to quantify key factors influencing aviation emissions; and then integrates 3E indicators of SAF and factors affecting aviation emissions into a system dynamics model simulating impacts of SAF routes and blending ratios on aviation emissions. The results show that: different SAF routes have their advantages in terms of 3E; reducing aviation demand and improving aircraft fuel efficiency are the key emission reduction levers; and under the set scenario of blending ratios of SAF and conventional jet fuel in 2050, only blending 85 % and 100 % SAF can achieve the 65 % carbon emission reduction target required by the aviation industry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004422\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004422","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of sustainable aviation fuel based on life cycle prediction model
Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is crucial for the aviation industry to achieve its 2050 net-zero emissions target. The energy consumption, environmental impacts, and economic costs of SAF vary significantly due to feedstocks and processes. This study applies life cycle assessment to evaluate SAF routes’ energy-environment-economy (3E) performance; uses the STIRPAT model to quantify key factors influencing aviation emissions; and then integrates 3E indicators of SAF and factors affecting aviation emissions into a system dynamics model simulating impacts of SAF routes and blending ratios on aviation emissions. The results show that: different SAF routes have their advantages in terms of 3E; reducing aviation demand and improving aircraft fuel efficiency are the key emission reduction levers; and under the set scenario of blending ratios of SAF and conventional jet fuel in 2050, only blending 85 % and 100 % SAF can achieve the 65 % carbon emission reduction target required by the aviation industry.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.