部分深度浮鱼导向杆架的全尺寸性能评价

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Halvor Kjærås , Henrik Baktoft , Ana T. Silva , Karl Øystein Gjelland , Finn Økland , Mohammadreza Maddahi , Ismail Albayrak , Leif Lia , Robert M. Boes , Torbjørn Forseth
{"title":"部分深度浮鱼导向杆架的全尺寸性能评价","authors":"Halvor Kjærås ,&nbsp;Henrik Baktoft ,&nbsp;Ana T. Silva ,&nbsp;Karl Øystein Gjelland ,&nbsp;Finn Økland ,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Maddahi ,&nbsp;Ismail Albayrak ,&nbsp;Leif Lia ,&nbsp;Robert M. Boes ,&nbsp;Torbjørn Forseth","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Migratory fish are commonly hampered or harmed by Hydropower plants (HPP). To mitigate these impacts, protective and guidance structures have been developed. Modified Bar Rack (MBR) systems, tested under laboratorial conditions, have emerged as promising structures to guide migratory fish past HPP intakes. We evaluated the downstream passage and guiding efficiency of a partial depth floating MBR (89 m long x 1,5 m deep, 50 mm bar spacing) at the River Mandal, Norway. Passage efficiency and behavioural responses were examined by tracking 118 Atlantic salmon smolts with 2D and 3D telemetry. Flow dynamics and behavioural observations were combined to relate hydrodynamic conditions to guidance efficiency.</div><div>The installation of the MBR system, combined with a flow reduction at the HPP (to 50 % of the river flow), resulted in a downstream passage efficiency of 72.5 %, representing a 22 percentage point increase compared to predictions with flow reduction alone. Success was limited by the partial-depth design, as some smolts passed beneath the rack. Of the 56 tracked smolts that interacted with the MBR (some descended and passed under), 67 % were guided. Based on smolt depth distribution and behavioural responses, guiding efficiency could be approximated at 76 %, almost matching laboratory results. The relatively high guidance was likely due to the sweeping velocity created by the design of the MBR, that also prevented rack clogging.</div><div>This study provides support for the concept of guiding fish into a migration corridor using an MBR system and presents the first full-scale evaluation of a MBR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 107778"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full scale performance evaluation of a partial-depth floating fish guidance bar rack\",\"authors\":\"Halvor Kjærås ,&nbsp;Henrik Baktoft ,&nbsp;Ana T. Silva ,&nbsp;Karl Øystein Gjelland ,&nbsp;Finn Økland ,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Maddahi ,&nbsp;Ismail Albayrak ,&nbsp;Leif Lia ,&nbsp;Robert M. Boes ,&nbsp;Torbjørn Forseth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Migratory fish are commonly hampered or harmed by Hydropower plants (HPP). To mitigate these impacts, protective and guidance structures have been developed. Modified Bar Rack (MBR) systems, tested under laboratorial conditions, have emerged as promising structures to guide migratory fish past HPP intakes. We evaluated the downstream passage and guiding efficiency of a partial depth floating MBR (89 m long x 1,5 m deep, 50 mm bar spacing) at the River Mandal, Norway. Passage efficiency and behavioural responses were examined by tracking 118 Atlantic salmon smolts with 2D and 3D telemetry. Flow dynamics and behavioural observations were combined to relate hydrodynamic conditions to guidance efficiency.</div><div>The installation of the MBR system, combined with a flow reduction at the HPP (to 50 % of the river flow), resulted in a downstream passage efficiency of 72.5 %, representing a 22 percentage point increase compared to predictions with flow reduction alone. Success was limited by the partial-depth design, as some smolts passed beneath the rack. Of the 56 tracked smolts that interacted with the MBR (some descended and passed under), 67 % were guided. Based on smolt depth distribution and behavioural responses, guiding efficiency could be approximated at 76 %, almost matching laboratory results. The relatively high guidance was likely due to the sweeping velocity created by the design of the MBR, that also prevented rack clogging.</div><div>This study provides support for the concept of guiding fish into a migration corridor using an MBR system and presents the first full-scale evaluation of a MBR.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500268X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500268X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洄游鱼类通常受到水电站的阻碍或伤害。为了减轻这些影响,已经制定了保护和引导结构。在实验室条件下测试的改良杆架(MBR)系统已经成为引导洄游鱼类通过HPP摄入量的有希望的结构。我们在挪威Mandal河评估了部分深度浮式MBR(89米长,1.5米深,50毫米杆距)的下游通道和导向效率。通过对118条大西洋鲑鱼幼崽进行二维和三维遥测,研究了它们的洄游效率和行为反应。流体动力学和行为观察相结合,将流体力学条件与导引效率联系起来。MBR系统的安装,再加上HPP的流量减少(降至河水流量的50%),下游通道效率达到72.5%,与单独减少流量的预测相比,提高了22个百分点。成功受到部分深度设计的限制,因为一些小蝌蚪从机架下面经过。在与MBR相互作用的56只被跟踪的小海豚中(一些下降并从下面通过),67%被引导。基于潜深分布和行为反应,导引效率可接近76%,与实验室结果基本吻合。相对较高的导引可能是由于MBR设计产生的扫速,这也防止了机架堵塞。本研究为利用MBR系统引导鱼类进入洄游走廊的概念提供了支持,并首次对MBR进行了全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Full scale performance evaluation of a partial-depth floating fish guidance bar rack
Migratory fish are commonly hampered or harmed by Hydropower plants (HPP). To mitigate these impacts, protective and guidance structures have been developed. Modified Bar Rack (MBR) systems, tested under laboratorial conditions, have emerged as promising structures to guide migratory fish past HPP intakes. We evaluated the downstream passage and guiding efficiency of a partial depth floating MBR (89 m long x 1,5 m deep, 50 mm bar spacing) at the River Mandal, Norway. Passage efficiency and behavioural responses were examined by tracking 118 Atlantic salmon smolts with 2D and 3D telemetry. Flow dynamics and behavioural observations were combined to relate hydrodynamic conditions to guidance efficiency.
The installation of the MBR system, combined with a flow reduction at the HPP (to 50 % of the river flow), resulted in a downstream passage efficiency of 72.5 %, representing a 22 percentage point increase compared to predictions with flow reduction alone. Success was limited by the partial-depth design, as some smolts passed beneath the rack. Of the 56 tracked smolts that interacted with the MBR (some descended and passed under), 67 % were guided. Based on smolt depth distribution and behavioural responses, guiding efficiency could be approximated at 76 %, almost matching laboratory results. The relatively high guidance was likely due to the sweeping velocity created by the design of the MBR, that also prevented rack clogging.
This study provides support for the concept of guiding fish into a migration corridor using an MBR system and presents the first full-scale evaluation of a MBR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信