Madeleine Zenir , Pamela Milkovich , Patrick Donnelly , Wayne Lundstrom , Mark Fullen , Erika Scott
{"title":"美国东北部伐木工人的安全、健康和生产力的定性观点:对行业可持续性的影响","authors":"Madeleine Zenir , Pamela Milkovich , Patrick Donnelly , Wayne Lundstrom , Mark Fullen , Erika Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The logging industry in the United States has experienced a shift from conventional to mechanized operations. While logging remains the most fatal industry in the US, the protection of the operator inside an equipment cab has had positive impacts on safety. However, mechanization has introduced new health and safety risks for loggers. In this study, we sought to expand our knowledge of health and safety concerns by conducting semi-structured interviews with loggers in the northeastern US, specifically New York, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Using a 17-question interview guide, 29 interviews were conducted and recorded. Interviews were transcribed and coded using a qualitative thematic analysis approach in NVivo 12. Discovered themes included: health risks associated with mechanization and mental stress related to financial burdens, difficulty accessing health insurance, and the public's view of the industry. Participants expressed their concerns over health risks associated with prolonged machinery usage, especially weight gain. Loggers shared that financial stress was often a result of debt accrual from equipment purchases and unstable timber markets. Few of the loggers interviewed had health insurance and cited that because of the expense and perceived benefits, it was not a priority. Lastly, loggers shared their concerns over the prevalence of untrained logging operations negatively impacting the industry and how it affects their businesses. With these data, we can better identify strategies that would effectively reach and assist loggers to improve their health and safety conditions at work, allowing companies to reduce the economic impacts associated with illness and injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative perspectives on safety, health, and productivity from Northeast United States loggers: Implications for industry sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Zenir , Pamela Milkovich , Patrick Donnelly , Wayne Lundstrom , Mark Fullen , Erika Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The logging industry in the United States has experienced a shift from conventional to mechanized operations. While logging remains the most fatal industry in the US, the protection of the operator inside an equipment cab has had positive impacts on safety. However, mechanization has introduced new health and safety risks for loggers. In this study, we sought to expand our knowledge of health and safety concerns by conducting semi-structured interviews with loggers in the northeastern US, specifically New York, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Using a 17-question interview guide, 29 interviews were conducted and recorded. Interviews were transcribed and coded using a qualitative thematic analysis approach in NVivo 12. Discovered themes included: health risks associated with mechanization and mental stress related to financial burdens, difficulty accessing health insurance, and the public's view of the industry. Participants expressed their concerns over health risks associated with prolonged machinery usage, especially weight gain. Loggers shared that financial stress was often a result of debt accrual from equipment purchases and unstable timber markets. Few of the loggers interviewed had health insurance and cited that because of the expense and perceived benefits, it was not a priority. Lastly, loggers shared their concerns over the prevalence of untrained logging operations negatively impacting the industry and how it affects their businesses. With these data, we can better identify strategies that would effectively reach and assist loggers to improve their health and safety conditions at work, allowing companies to reduce the economic impacts associated with illness and injury.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Qualitative perspectives on safety, health, and productivity from Northeast United States loggers: Implications for industry sustainability
The logging industry in the United States has experienced a shift from conventional to mechanized operations. While logging remains the most fatal industry in the US, the protection of the operator inside an equipment cab has had positive impacts on safety. However, mechanization has introduced new health and safety risks for loggers. In this study, we sought to expand our knowledge of health and safety concerns by conducting semi-structured interviews with loggers in the northeastern US, specifically New York, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Using a 17-question interview guide, 29 interviews were conducted and recorded. Interviews were transcribed and coded using a qualitative thematic analysis approach in NVivo 12. Discovered themes included: health risks associated with mechanization and mental stress related to financial burdens, difficulty accessing health insurance, and the public's view of the industry. Participants expressed their concerns over health risks associated with prolonged machinery usage, especially weight gain. Loggers shared that financial stress was often a result of debt accrual from equipment purchases and unstable timber markets. Few of the loggers interviewed had health insurance and cited that because of the expense and perceived benefits, it was not a priority. Lastly, loggers shared their concerns over the prevalence of untrained logging operations negatively impacting the industry and how it affects their businesses. With these data, we can better identify strategies that would effectively reach and assist loggers to improve their health and safety conditions at work, allowing companies to reduce the economic impacts associated with illness and injury.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.