{"title":"基于有效应力分析的复垦土液化响应","authors":"Riwaj Dhakal, Misko Cubrinovski","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One-dimensional (1D) dynamic effective stress site response analysis (ESA) is performed for profiles at the port of Wellington, New Zealand (CentrePort), which contains reclamation fills comprised of gravel-sand-silt (G-S-S) mixtures and hydraulic fills. The first phase of the study realistically simulates three recent earthquake case histories while considering modelling uncertainties by using the PM4Sand and the Stress-Density constitutive models. The results illustrate possible mechanisms explaining the severity of liquefaction manifestation and soil ejecta characteristics observed in G-S-S fills through careful engineering interpretation of the response. Challenges for 1D ESA to explain complex manifestation patterns affected by two-dimensional variability in fill composition and response characteristics are illustrated for the hydraulic fills. In the second phase of analyses, ESA-based response measures are proposed to quantify the severity of the liquefaction response for a range of input seismic demands. The response characteristics show very small scatter despite using a range of different input ground motions and two soil constitutive models. Results illustrate the capability of ESA to capture details of the liquefaction response such as the similar threshold seismic intensity for liquefaction triggering of the loosely deposited fills, different maximum response of the sites reflecting the differences in the thicknesses of the fills, and the evolution of the response from triggering to maximum reflecting differences in depositional characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"65 5","pages":"Article 101677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquefaction response of reclaimed soils from effective stress analysis\",\"authors\":\"Riwaj Dhakal, Misko Cubrinovski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>One-dimensional (1D) dynamic effective stress site response analysis (ESA) is performed for profiles at the port of Wellington, New Zealand (CentrePort), which contains reclamation fills comprised of gravel-sand-silt (G-S-S) mixtures and hydraulic fills. The first phase of the study realistically simulates three recent earthquake case histories while considering modelling uncertainties by using the PM4Sand and the Stress-Density constitutive models. The results illustrate possible mechanisms explaining the severity of liquefaction manifestation and soil ejecta characteristics observed in G-S-S fills through careful engineering interpretation of the response. Challenges for 1D ESA to explain complex manifestation patterns affected by two-dimensional variability in fill composition and response characteristics are illustrated for the hydraulic fills. In the second phase of analyses, ESA-based response measures are proposed to quantify the severity of the liquefaction response for a range of input seismic demands. The response characteristics show very small scatter despite using a range of different input ground motions and two soil constitutive models. Results illustrate the capability of ESA to capture details of the liquefaction response such as the similar threshold seismic intensity for liquefaction triggering of the loosely deposited fills, different maximum response of the sites reflecting the differences in the thicknesses of the fills, and the evolution of the response from triggering to maximum reflecting differences in depositional characteristics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":\"65 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625001118\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625001118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liquefaction response of reclaimed soils from effective stress analysis
One-dimensional (1D) dynamic effective stress site response analysis (ESA) is performed for profiles at the port of Wellington, New Zealand (CentrePort), which contains reclamation fills comprised of gravel-sand-silt (G-S-S) mixtures and hydraulic fills. The first phase of the study realistically simulates three recent earthquake case histories while considering modelling uncertainties by using the PM4Sand and the Stress-Density constitutive models. The results illustrate possible mechanisms explaining the severity of liquefaction manifestation and soil ejecta characteristics observed in G-S-S fills through careful engineering interpretation of the response. Challenges for 1D ESA to explain complex manifestation patterns affected by two-dimensional variability in fill composition and response characteristics are illustrated for the hydraulic fills. In the second phase of analyses, ESA-based response measures are proposed to quantify the severity of the liquefaction response for a range of input seismic demands. The response characteristics show very small scatter despite using a range of different input ground motions and two soil constitutive models. Results illustrate the capability of ESA to capture details of the liquefaction response such as the similar threshold seismic intensity for liquefaction triggering of the loosely deposited fills, different maximum response of the sites reflecting the differences in the thicknesses of the fills, and the evolution of the response from triggering to maximum reflecting differences in depositional characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020.
Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.