治疗攀登作为精神科住院病人的辅助治疗:一项质性研究

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Lisa Zöbl , Anika Frühauf , Alexander Heimbeck , Ulrich Voderholzer , Martin Kopp
{"title":"治疗攀登作为精神科住院病人的辅助治疗:一项质性研究","authors":"Lisa Zöbl ,&nbsp;Anika Frühauf ,&nbsp;Alexander Heimbeck ,&nbsp;Ulrich Voderholzer ,&nbsp;Martin Kopp","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is increasingly used as a therapy form in psychosomatic settings. Recent studies have shown its effectiveness in terms of symptom severity and other psychological factors compared to other sports and even to group cognitive behavioural therapy. To gain a deeper understanding of TC, the present study aimed to qualitatively explore the patients' perspectives.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of inpatients at a psychosomatic clinic who participated in a standardised climbing therapy group. The main diagnoses of the participants were depression, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 17; 12 female, 5 male). Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most patients described positive effects of TC. The following four factors emerged: Cognitive (e.g. concentration, focus), emotional (e.g. trust in oneself and others), social (e.g. mutual support), and physical (e.g. strength). Patients also reported positive perceived aspects in connection with their mental disorder and listed various transfer options, which indicates an effectiveness beyond TC.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>From the patients' perspective, TC influences various factors, which also interact. Many of the identified effects could be assigned to the common factors of psychotherapy, which indicates that TC addresses similar factors as established psychotherapies. In addition to the researched aspects of self-efficacy and affective responses, new aspects were identified: Focus and concentration, social interaction, facing challenges, improved self-confidence, trust in others, and resource activation. Practical implications could be derived from this. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of TC in randomised, controlled clinical trials, considering the aspects identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic climbing as an adjunctive treatment for psychiatric inpatients: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Zöbl ,&nbsp;Anika Frühauf ,&nbsp;Alexander Heimbeck ,&nbsp;Ulrich Voderholzer ,&nbsp;Martin Kopp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is increasingly used as a therapy form in psychosomatic settings. Recent studies have shown its effectiveness in terms of symptom severity and other psychological factors compared to other sports and even to group cognitive behavioural therapy. To gain a deeper understanding of TC, the present study aimed to qualitatively explore the patients' perspectives.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of inpatients at a psychosomatic clinic who participated in a standardised climbing therapy group. The main diagnoses of the participants were depression, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 17; 12 female, 5 male). Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most patients described positive effects of TC. The following four factors emerged: Cognitive (e.g. concentration, focus), emotional (e.g. trust in oneself and others), social (e.g. mutual support), and physical (e.g. strength). Patients also reported positive perceived aspects in connection with their mental disorder and listed various transfer options, which indicates an effectiveness beyond TC.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>From the patients' perspective, TC influences various factors, which also interact. Many of the identified effects could be assigned to the common factors of psychotherapy, which indicates that TC addresses similar factors as established psychotherapies. In addition to the researched aspects of self-efficacy and affective responses, new aspects were identified: Focus and concentration, social interaction, facing challenges, improved self-confidence, trust in others, and resource activation. Practical implications could be derived from this. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of TC in randomised, controlled clinical trials, considering the aspects identified.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791625000424\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791625000424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:治疗攀登(TC)越来越多地被用作心身环境的治疗形式。最近的研究表明,与其他运动甚至群体认知行为疗法相比,它在症状严重程度和其他心理因素方面的有效性。为了更深入地了解TC,本研究旨在定性地探讨患者的观点。方法定性研究采用半结构化访谈法,探讨某心身门诊住院患者参加标准化攀爬治疗组的经历。参与者的主要诊断为抑郁、焦虑或强迫症(n = 17;女性12人,男性5人)。数据分析采用主题内容分析。结果大多数患者描述了TC的积极作用。以下四个因素出现了:认知(如集中、专注)、情感(如对自己和他人的信任)、社交(如相互支持)和身体(如力量)。患者还报告了与他们的精神障碍有关的积极感知方面,并列出了各种转移选择,这表明了超越TC的有效性。从患者的角度来看,TC影响着各种因素,这些因素也相互作用。许多已确定的效果可以归因于心理治疗的共同因素,这表明TC解决了与已建立的心理治疗相似的因素。除了自我效能感和情感反应的研究方面外,还发现了新的方面:集中注意力、社会互动、面对挑战、提高自信、对他人的信任和资源激活。由此可以得出实际意义。未来的研究应该在随机对照临床试验中调查TC的疗效,考虑到已确定的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic climbing as an adjunctive treatment for psychiatric inpatients: A qualitative study

Background

Therapeutic climbing (TC) is increasingly used as a therapy form in psychosomatic settings. Recent studies have shown its effectiveness in terms of symptom severity and other psychological factors compared to other sports and even to group cognitive behavioural therapy. To gain a deeper understanding of TC, the present study aimed to qualitatively explore the patients' perspectives.

Methodology

The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of inpatients at a psychosomatic clinic who participated in a standardised climbing therapy group. The main diagnoses of the participants were depression, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 17; 12 female, 5 male). Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.

Results

Most patients described positive effects of TC. The following four factors emerged: Cognitive (e.g. concentration, focus), emotional (e.g. trust in oneself and others), social (e.g. mutual support), and physical (e.g. strength). Patients also reported positive perceived aspects in connection with their mental disorder and listed various transfer options, which indicates an effectiveness beyond TC.

Discussion

From the patients' perspective, TC influences various factors, which also interact. Many of the identified effects could be assigned to the common factors of psychotherapy, which indicates that TC addresses similar factors as established psychotherapies. In addition to the researched aspects of self-efficacy and affective responses, new aspects were identified: Focus and concentration, social interaction, facing challenges, improved self-confidence, trust in others, and resource activation. Practical implications could be derived from this. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of TC in randomised, controlled clinical trials, considering the aspects identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信