“我总是很好奇”:追踪年轻人在日常生活中对社交媒体的接触和反应

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Victoria M.E. Bridgland , Ella K. Moeck , Melanie K.T. Takarangi
{"title":"“我总是很好奇”:追踪年轻人在日常生活中对社交媒体的接触和反应","authors":"Victoria M.E. Bridgland ,&nbsp;Ella K. Moeck ,&nbsp;Melanie K.T. Takarangi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trigger warnings are alerts that intend to help people emotionally prepare for, or avoid, potentially distressing material likely to trigger memories or emotions related to past experiences. Lab studies suggest that warnings overwhelmingly result in approach behaviour rather than avoidance. However, no research to date has tracked exposure and responses to trigger warnings in <em>daily life.</em> Here 261 young adults (aged 17–25) completed a 7-day daily diary study in which they tracked exposure to trigger warnings on social media and reported if they approached or avoided the content marked by the warnings. Because trigger warnings are intended for use by certain groups of vulnerable people (e.g., trauma survivors/people with mental health concerns), we also measured various psychopathological characteristics (posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms, trauma exposure, etc.). Consistent with lab-based studies, we found that most people (∼90 %) reported approaching content marked by a trigger warning, and most commonly did so out of “curiosity”. Moreover, only ∼10 % of participants reported always avoiding content marked by a trigger warning when they saw it—signalling a tendency to approach warned material in the real world. We also found no relationship between self-reported avoidance of content marked with trigger warnings that was encountered in daily life and any mental health risk marker (e.g., PTSD symptoms, trauma exposure). Our findings therefore further question claims that trigger warnings are an effective online mental health intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I'm always curious”: Tracking young adults exposure and responses to social media trigger warnings in daily life\",\"authors\":\"Victoria M.E. Bridgland ,&nbsp;Ella K. Moeck ,&nbsp;Melanie K.T. Takarangi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Trigger warnings are alerts that intend to help people emotionally prepare for, or avoid, potentially distressing material likely to trigger memories or emotions related to past experiences. Lab studies suggest that warnings overwhelmingly result in approach behaviour rather than avoidance. However, no research to date has tracked exposure and responses to trigger warnings in <em>daily life.</em> Here 261 young adults (aged 17–25) completed a 7-day daily diary study in which they tracked exposure to trigger warnings on social media and reported if they approached or avoided the content marked by the warnings. Because trigger warnings are intended for use by certain groups of vulnerable people (e.g., trauma survivors/people with mental health concerns), we also measured various psychopathological characteristics (posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms, trauma exposure, etc.). Consistent with lab-based studies, we found that most people (∼90 %) reported approaching content marked by a trigger warning, and most commonly did so out of “curiosity”. Moreover, only ∼10 % of participants reported always avoiding content marked by a trigger warning when they saw it—signalling a tendency to approach warned material in the real world. We also found no relationship between self-reported avoidance of content marked with trigger warnings that was encountered in daily life and any mental health risk marker (e.g., PTSD symptoms, trauma exposure). Our findings therefore further question claims that trigger warnings are an effective online mental health intervention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791625000242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791625000242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

触发警告是一种旨在帮助人们在情感上做好准备或避免可能引发与过去经历相关的记忆或情绪的潜在痛苦材料的警报。实验室研究表明,警告压倒性地导致了接近行为,而不是回避。然而,迄今为止还没有研究追踪日常生活中对触发警告的暴露和反应。在这里,261名年轻人(17-25岁)完成了一项为期7天的每日日记研究,在这项研究中,他们追踪了社交媒体上触发警告的暴露情况,并报告了他们是否接近或避免了带有警告标志的内容。由于触发警告是针对某些弱势群体(例如,创伤幸存者/有精神健康问题的人)使用的,因此我们还测量了各种精神病理特征(创伤后应激障碍[PTSD]症状,创伤暴露等)。与基于实验室的研究一致,我们发现大多数人(约90%)报告接近标有触发警告的内容,大多数人这样做是出于“好奇”。此外,只有约10%的参与者报告说,当他们看到带有触发警告的内容时,总是回避它——这表明他们倾向于接近现实世界中的警告材料。我们还发现,在日常生活中遇到的自我报告回避带有触发警告的内容与任何心理健康风险标记(例如,PTSD症状,创伤暴露)之间没有关系。因此,我们的研究结果进一步质疑了触发警告是一种有效的在线心理健康干预措施的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“I'm always curious”: Tracking young adults exposure and responses to social media trigger warnings in daily life
Trigger warnings are alerts that intend to help people emotionally prepare for, or avoid, potentially distressing material likely to trigger memories or emotions related to past experiences. Lab studies suggest that warnings overwhelmingly result in approach behaviour rather than avoidance. However, no research to date has tracked exposure and responses to trigger warnings in daily life. Here 261 young adults (aged 17–25) completed a 7-day daily diary study in which they tracked exposure to trigger warnings on social media and reported if they approached or avoided the content marked by the warnings. Because trigger warnings are intended for use by certain groups of vulnerable people (e.g., trauma survivors/people with mental health concerns), we also measured various psychopathological characteristics (posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms, trauma exposure, etc.). Consistent with lab-based studies, we found that most people (∼90 %) reported approaching content marked by a trigger warning, and most commonly did so out of “curiosity”. Moreover, only ∼10 % of participants reported always avoiding content marked by a trigger warning when they saw it—signalling a tendency to approach warned material in the real world. We also found no relationship between self-reported avoidance of content marked with trigger warnings that was encountered in daily life and any mental health risk marker (e.g., PTSD symptoms, trauma exposure). Our findings therefore further question claims that trigger warnings are an effective online mental health intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信