探索性倾向解释了拖延症中的任务延迟

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Lauren L. Saling , Sion Weatherhead , Daniel B. Cohen
{"title":"探索性倾向解释了拖延症中的任务延迟","authors":"Lauren L. Saling ,&nbsp;Sion Weatherhead ,&nbsp;Daniel B. Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study (N = 237), we explore a novel explanation of the mechanisms underlying task delay during procrastination. Given emerging evidence that procrastination sometimes has creative advantages, we hypothesized that procrastinators delay tasks because they prefer exploratory learning strategies. Exploratory learning in children involves cognitive flexibility that enables more creative pattern recognition in conjunctive rule tasks compared to adults. This pattern may parallel the creative advantages observed in procrastinators. We therefore investigated whether procrastinators were more accurate than non-procrastinators in decoding conjunctive rules and whether procrastination predicts creativity. We found that procrastinators were indeed more successful in decoding conjunctive rules and showed higher creativity. These findings suggest that procrastinators employ a distinctively exploratory approach that, while risking task delay, can facilitate performance in certain contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory tendencies explain task delay in procrastination\",\"authors\":\"Lauren L. Saling ,&nbsp;Sion Weatherhead ,&nbsp;Daniel B. Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study (N = 237), we explore a novel explanation of the mechanisms underlying task delay during procrastination. Given emerging evidence that procrastination sometimes has creative advantages, we hypothesized that procrastinators delay tasks because they prefer exploratory learning strategies. Exploratory learning in children involves cognitive flexibility that enables more creative pattern recognition in conjunctive rule tasks compared to adults. This pattern may parallel the creative advantages observed in procrastinators. We therefore investigated whether procrastinators were more accurate than non-procrastinators in decoding conjunctive rules and whether procrastination predicts creativity. We found that procrastinators were indeed more successful in decoding conjunctive rules and showed higher creativity. These findings suggest that procrastinators employ a distinctively exploratory approach that, while risking task delay, can facilitate performance in certain contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X25000467\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X25000467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中(N = 237),我们探索了拖延过程中任务延迟机制的新解释。鉴于越来越多的证据表明拖延症有时具有创造性优势,我们假设拖延症患者延迟任务是因为他们更喜欢探索性学习策略。与成人相比,儿童的探索性学习涉及认知灵活性,使其能够在联合规则任务中更有创造性的模式识别。这种模式可能与在拖延者身上观察到的创造性优势相似。因此,我们调查了拖延者是否比非拖延者更准确地解码连接规则,以及拖延是否预示着创造力。我们发现,拖延者确实更成功地破译了连词规则,并表现出更高的创造力。这些发现表明,拖延者采用了一种独特的探索性方法,虽然有任务延迟的风险,但可以促进在某些情况下的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploratory tendencies explain task delay in procrastination
In this study (N = 237), we explore a novel explanation of the mechanisms underlying task delay during procrastination. Given emerging evidence that procrastination sometimes has creative advantages, we hypothesized that procrastinators delay tasks because they prefer exploratory learning strategies. Exploratory learning in children involves cognitive flexibility that enables more creative pattern recognition in conjunctive rule tasks compared to adults. This pattern may parallel the creative advantages observed in procrastinators. We therefore investigated whether procrastinators were more accurate than non-procrastinators in decoding conjunctive rules and whether procrastination predicts creativity. We found that procrastinators were indeed more successful in decoding conjunctive rules and showed higher creativity. These findings suggest that procrastinators employ a distinctively exploratory approach that, while risking task delay, can facilitate performance in certain contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信