{"title":"ESG全球趋势:中国与国际比较分析","authors":"Meng Qi, Wenjing Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global community is increasingly prioritizing environmental sustainability, with numerous enterprises adopting ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) strategies to align their operations with green development. However, the current global research on ESG remains fragmented, marked by disparities and growing tensions among nations. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 4,047 publicly available articles from the Web of Science (WoS) published between 2012 and 2024, utilizing SPSS, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. Additionally, it incorporates a comparative analysis of 935 articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The findings reveal that China and the United States lead significantly in research output, yet their respective stages of ESG research differ markedly. The study also highlights a lack of interdisciplinary linkages in ESG research, with notable homogenization observed within the field. In China, the evolution of ESG-related knowledge has diversified over time, shifting from initial focus areas like investment to broader themes such as fiduciary duty and information disclosure. Given the existing research gaps and insufficient exploration of certain aspects, future studies should put forward practical response strategies to strengthen ESG regulation, and explore more comprehensive assessment methods to improve ESG capabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"87 ","pages":"Pages 2330-2345"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG global trends: A comparative analysis of China and the international community\",\"authors\":\"Meng Qi, Wenjing Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.08.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global community is increasingly prioritizing environmental sustainability, with numerous enterprises adopting ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) strategies to align their operations with green development. However, the current global research on ESG remains fragmented, marked by disparities and growing tensions among nations. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 4,047 publicly available articles from the Web of Science (WoS) published between 2012 and 2024, utilizing SPSS, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. Additionally, it incorporates a comparative analysis of 935 articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The findings reveal that China and the United States lead significantly in research output, yet their respective stages of ESG research differ markedly. The study also highlights a lack of interdisciplinary linkages in ESG research, with notable homogenization observed within the field. In China, the evolution of ESG-related knowledge has diversified over time, shifting from initial focus areas like investment to broader themes such as fiduciary duty and information disclosure. Given the existing research gaps and insufficient exploration of certain aspects, future studies should put forward practical response strategies to strengthen ESG regulation, and explore more comprehensive assessment methods to improve ESG capabilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 2330-2345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003418\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
国际社会越来越重视环境可持续性,许多企业采用ESG(环境、社会和治理)战略,使其运营与绿色发展保持一致。然而,目前全球对ESG的研究仍然支离破碎,各国之间的差异和紧张局势日益加剧。本研究利用SPSS、CiteSpace和VOSviewer对2012年至2024年间发表在Web of Science (WoS)上的4047篇公开文章进行了文献计量分析。此外,它还结合了来自中国知网(CNKI)的935篇文章的比较分析。研究结果显示,中国和美国在ESG研究产出方面处于领先地位,但两国各自所处的ESG研究阶段存在显著差异。该研究还强调了ESG研究中缺乏跨学科联系,在该领域内观察到明显的同质化。在中国,随着时间的推移,esg相关知识的演变已经多样化,从最初的重点领域(如投资)转向更广泛的主题(如受托责任和信息披露)。鉴于现有的研究空白和某些方面的探索不足,未来的研究应提出切实可行的应对策略,以加强ESG监管,并探索更全面的评估方法,以提高ESG能力。
ESG global trends: A comparative analysis of China and the international community
The global community is increasingly prioritizing environmental sustainability, with numerous enterprises adopting ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) strategies to align their operations with green development. However, the current global research on ESG remains fragmented, marked by disparities and growing tensions among nations. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 4,047 publicly available articles from the Web of Science (WoS) published between 2012 and 2024, utilizing SPSS, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. Additionally, it incorporates a comparative analysis of 935 articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The findings reveal that China and the United States lead significantly in research output, yet their respective stages of ESG research differ markedly. The study also highlights a lack of interdisciplinary linkages in ESG research, with notable homogenization observed within the field. In China, the evolution of ESG-related knowledge has diversified over time, shifting from initial focus areas like investment to broader themes such as fiduciary duty and information disclosure. Given the existing research gaps and insufficient exploration of certain aspects, future studies should put forward practical response strategies to strengthen ESG regulation, and explore more comprehensive assessment methods to improve ESG capabilities.
期刊介绍:
Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.