Miika Köykkä, Marko S. Laaksonen, Keijo Ruotsalainen, Vesa Linnamo
{"title":"静止握持评估中的握持稳定性和姿势控制可以为冬季两项立定射击提供有价值的信息,但必须认识到瞄准策略的重要性","authors":"Miika Köykkä, Marko S. Laaksonen, Keijo Ruotsalainen, Vesa Linnamo","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated stability of hold and postural control in a static holding task and a biathlon standing shooting task, and shooting performance, examining the associations between these tasks and potential differences between biathletes employing a hold-based (HBS) or timing-based (TBS) aiming strategy. Twenty-two biathletes completed a static holding test in the standing shooting posture (Holding) and a biathlon standing shooting test (Shooting) using dry shots. Postural control was evaluated using force platforms, and stability of hold was assessed using a Vicon motion capture system (Holding) and a Noptel training device (Shooting). Of the stability of hold measures, links between the tasks were observed in aiming point vertical standard deviation (<i>R</i> = 0.78) and vertical mean velocity (<i>R</i> = 0.74) in HBS and in vertical mean velocity (<i>R</i> = 0.62) in TBS (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Regardless of aiming strategy, most postural control measures in Holding correlated with their counterparts in Shooting (<i>R</i> = 0.48 to 0.94 and <i>P</i> < 0.05) and shooting performance (hit point distance from the centre of the target) correlated with stability of hold measured during Holding (<i>R</i> = 0.74 and <i>P</i> < 0.001). Among the postural control measures, shooting performance was only clearly linked to front leg postural control measured during Holding in TBS (<i>R</i> = 0.87 and <i>P</i> < 0.003). These findings suggest that static holding ability and postural control are important in biathlon standing shooting regardless of aiming strategy but aiming dynamics during Holding align more closely with the practices of HBS during their shooting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of Hold and Postural Control During Static Hold Assessment Can Provide Valuable Information for Biathlon Standing Shooting but Aiming Strategy Should Be Acknowledged\",\"authors\":\"Miika Köykkä, Marko S. Laaksonen, Keijo Ruotsalainen, Vesa Linnamo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated stability of hold and postural control in a static holding task and a biathlon standing shooting task, and shooting performance, examining the associations between these tasks and potential differences between biathletes employing a hold-based (HBS) or timing-based (TBS) aiming strategy. Twenty-two biathletes completed a static holding test in the standing shooting posture (Holding) and a biathlon standing shooting test (Shooting) using dry shots. Postural control was evaluated using force platforms, and stability of hold was assessed using a Vicon motion capture system (Holding) and a Noptel training device (Shooting). Of the stability of hold measures, links between the tasks were observed in aiming point vertical standard deviation (<i>R</i> = 0.78) and vertical mean velocity (<i>R</i> = 0.74) in HBS and in vertical mean velocity (<i>R</i> = 0.62) in TBS (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Regardless of aiming strategy, most postural control measures in Holding correlated with their counterparts in Shooting (<i>R</i> = 0.48 to 0.94 and <i>P</i> < 0.05) and shooting performance (hit point distance from the centre of the target) correlated with stability of hold measured during Holding (<i>R</i> = 0.74 and <i>P</i> < 0.001). Among the postural control measures, shooting performance was only clearly linked to front leg postural control measured during Holding in TBS (<i>R</i> = 0.87 and <i>P</i> < 0.003). These findings suggest that static holding ability and postural control are important in biathlon standing shooting regardless of aiming strategy but aiming dynamics during Holding align more closely with the practices of HBS during their shooting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究考察了两项运动员在静态手持任务和站立射击任务中的手持和姿势控制的稳定性,以及射击成绩,研究了两项任务之间的联系,以及两项运动员采用基于手持(HBS)和基于计时(TBS)瞄准策略之间的潜在差异。22名冬季两项运动员分别完成了站立射击姿势的静态手持测试(手持)和冬季两项站立射击测试(射击)。使用力平台评估姿势控制,使用Vicon动作捕捉系统(Holding)和Noptel训练装置(Shooting)评估握持的稳定性。在保持测量的稳定性方面,HBS的瞄准点垂直标准偏差(R = 0.78)和垂直平均速度(R = 0.74)以及TBS的垂直平均速度(R = 0.62)在任务之间存在联系(均P <; 0.05)。无论采用何种瞄准策略,握持时的大多数姿势控制措施与射击时的姿势控制措施相关(R = 0.48 ~ 0.94, P < 0.05),而射击性能(命中点距目标中心的距离)与握持时的握持稳定性相关(R = 0.74, P < 0.001)。在姿势控制措施中,射击表现仅与TBS中持球时测量的前腿姿势控制有明显联系(R = 0.87, P < 0.003)。这些结果表明,在冬季两项立项射击中,无论采用何种瞄准策略,静态手持能力和姿势控制都很重要,但手持时的瞄准动态与HBS射击时的瞄准动态更接近。
Stability of Hold and Postural Control During Static Hold Assessment Can Provide Valuable Information for Biathlon Standing Shooting but Aiming Strategy Should Be Acknowledged
This study investigated stability of hold and postural control in a static holding task and a biathlon standing shooting task, and shooting performance, examining the associations between these tasks and potential differences between biathletes employing a hold-based (HBS) or timing-based (TBS) aiming strategy. Twenty-two biathletes completed a static holding test in the standing shooting posture (Holding) and a biathlon standing shooting test (Shooting) using dry shots. Postural control was evaluated using force platforms, and stability of hold was assessed using a Vicon motion capture system (Holding) and a Noptel training device (Shooting). Of the stability of hold measures, links between the tasks were observed in aiming point vertical standard deviation (R = 0.78) and vertical mean velocity (R = 0.74) in HBS and in vertical mean velocity (R = 0.62) in TBS (all P < 0.05). Regardless of aiming strategy, most postural control measures in Holding correlated with their counterparts in Shooting (R = 0.48 to 0.94 and P < 0.05) and shooting performance (hit point distance from the centre of the target) correlated with stability of hold measured during Holding (R = 0.74 and P < 0.001). Among the postural control measures, shooting performance was only clearly linked to front leg postural control measured during Holding in TBS (R = 0.87 and P < 0.003). These findings suggest that static holding ability and postural control are important in biathlon standing shooting regardless of aiming strategy but aiming dynamics during Holding align more closely with the practices of HBS during their shooting.