精神病学高级和重症监护的十年:专业人士对发展和未来影响的反思

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
I. C. de Jong Isa, A. L. van Melle Laura, S. Gerritsen Sylvia, C. L. Mulder Cornelis, M. A. van den Hoven Mariëtte, Y. Voskes Yolande
{"title":"精神病学高级和重症监护的十年:专业人士对发展和未来影响的反思","authors":"I. C. de Jong Isa,&nbsp;A. L. van Melle Laura,&nbsp;S. Gerritsen Sylvia,&nbsp;C. L. Mulder Cornelis,&nbsp;M. A. van den Hoven Mariëtte,&nbsp;Y. Voskes Yolande","doi":"10.1111/inm.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, psychiatric wards across the Netherlands have worked in accordance with the High and Intensive Care model to reduce coercion and improve the quality of care. Securing implementation of the model within a challenging mental health care context has proven to be effective but complex in practice. Consequently, this study aimed to both gain insight into the process of implementing the High and Intensive Care model by drawing upon professionals' own reflections and provide recommendations for improving practice and the model. This is a national multicentre study that utilised qualitative methods. Data was collected by a total of 26 institutional and national group interviews on which thematic analysis was conducted. Staff turnover, coercion, collaboration with outpatient care, working methodically and the move from control to contact were found to be the key developments since the model's implementation. Future efforts should focus upon staff retention and acquisition to ensure continuity of care and safety. Ongoing evaluation of coercion is essential to further reduce coercion. Collaborations with outpatient care and other stakeholders should be intensified to promote effective care. Management support, reflexivity and a clear vision are required to strengthen methodical working and collaboration between wards to create uniformity of practice. Working in contact with patients ensures safety but requires time and behavioural change. Applying implementation science can support improvements in acute mental health care by systematically addressing barriers to change, promoting sustainable evidence-based practices, and guiding the reduction of coercion. Further research into these barriers, including the exploration of non-coercive strategies and stakeholder involvement, is needed to enhance High and Intensive Care implementation and similar practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Years of High and Intensive Care Within Psychiatry: Professionals' Reflections Upon Developments and Future Implications\",\"authors\":\"I. C. de Jong Isa,&nbsp;A. L. van Melle Laura,&nbsp;S. Gerritsen Sylvia,&nbsp;C. L. Mulder Cornelis,&nbsp;M. A. van den Hoven Mariëtte,&nbsp;Y. Voskes Yolande\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past decade, psychiatric wards across the Netherlands have worked in accordance with the High and Intensive Care model to reduce coercion and improve the quality of care. Securing implementation of the model within a challenging mental health care context has proven to be effective but complex in practice. Consequently, this study aimed to both gain insight into the process of implementing the High and Intensive Care model by drawing upon professionals' own reflections and provide recommendations for improving practice and the model. This is a national multicentre study that utilised qualitative methods. Data was collected by a total of 26 institutional and national group interviews on which thematic analysis was conducted. Staff turnover, coercion, collaboration with outpatient care, working methodically and the move from control to contact were found to be the key developments since the model's implementation. Future efforts should focus upon staff retention and acquisition to ensure continuity of care and safety. Ongoing evaluation of coercion is essential to further reduce coercion. Collaborations with outpatient care and other stakeholders should be intensified to promote effective care. Management support, reflexivity and a clear vision are required to strengthen methodical working and collaboration between wards to create uniformity of practice. Working in contact with patients ensures safety but requires time and behavioural change. Applying implementation science can support improvements in acute mental health care by systematically addressing barriers to change, promoting sustainable evidence-based practices, and guiding the reduction of coercion. Further research into these barriers, including the exploration of non-coercive strategies and stakeholder involvement, is needed to enhance High and Intensive Care implementation and similar practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70120\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,荷兰各地的精神病病房都按照高级和重症监护模式开展工作,以减少强迫和提高护理质量。在具有挑战性的精神卫生保健环境中确保该模式的实施已被证明是有效的,但在实践中是复杂的。因此,本研究旨在通过借鉴专业人士自身的反思,深入了解高级和重症监护模式的实施过程,并为改进实践和模式提供建议。这是一项采用定性方法的全国性多中心研究。数据是通过总共26个机构和国家小组访谈收集的,并对其进行了专题分析。工作人员更替、强迫、与门诊护理合作、有条不紊地工作以及从控制到联系的转变被认为是该模式实施以来的主要发展。今后的努力应集中于工作人员的保留和征聘,以确保护理和安全的连续性。对胁迫进行持续评估对于进一步减少胁迫至关重要。应加强与门诊护理和其他利益攸关方的合作,以促进有效的护理。需要管理人员的支持、反思和清晰的愿景,以加强有条理的工作和病房之间的合作,以创造统一的做法。与病人接触的工作确保安全,但需要时间和行为改变。通过系统地解决变革的障碍,促进可持续的循证实践,并指导减少胁迫,应用实施科学可以支持改善急性精神卫生保健。需要进一步研究这些障碍,包括探索非强制性战略和利益攸关方的参与,以加强重症监护和类似做法的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten Years of High and Intensive Care Within Psychiatry: Professionals' Reflections Upon Developments and Future Implications

Over the past decade, psychiatric wards across the Netherlands have worked in accordance with the High and Intensive Care model to reduce coercion and improve the quality of care. Securing implementation of the model within a challenging mental health care context has proven to be effective but complex in practice. Consequently, this study aimed to both gain insight into the process of implementing the High and Intensive Care model by drawing upon professionals' own reflections and provide recommendations for improving practice and the model. This is a national multicentre study that utilised qualitative methods. Data was collected by a total of 26 institutional and national group interviews on which thematic analysis was conducted. Staff turnover, coercion, collaboration with outpatient care, working methodically and the move from control to contact were found to be the key developments since the model's implementation. Future efforts should focus upon staff retention and acquisition to ensure continuity of care and safety. Ongoing evaluation of coercion is essential to further reduce coercion. Collaborations with outpatient care and other stakeholders should be intensified to promote effective care. Management support, reflexivity and a clear vision are required to strengthen methodical working and collaboration between wards to create uniformity of practice. Working in contact with patients ensures safety but requires time and behavioural change. Applying implementation science can support improvements in acute mental health care by systematically addressing barriers to change, promoting sustainable evidence-based practices, and guiding the reduction of coercion. Further research into these barriers, including the exploration of non-coercive strategies and stakeholder involvement, is needed to enhance High and Intensive Care implementation and similar practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信