无认知障碍的社区老年抑郁症患者的定向体位摇摆倾向和静态平衡

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jethro Raphael M. Suarez, Veronica B. Decker, Joon-Hyuk Park, Nichole R. Lighthall, Michael Joseph S. Dino, Ladda Thiamwong
{"title":"无认知障碍的社区老年抑郁症患者的定向体位摇摆倾向和静态平衡","authors":"Jethro Raphael M. Suarez,&nbsp;Veronica B. Decker,&nbsp;Joon-Hyuk Park,&nbsp;Nichole R. Lighthall,&nbsp;Michael Joseph S. Dino,&nbsp;Ladda Thiamwong","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03144-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression is prevalent among older adults and is known to negatively affect balance, ultimately leading to falls. However, few studies have investigated the effect of depression on static balance metrics beyond postural sway distance and area of older adults without mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>To investigate if postural sway distance, sway area, medial-lateral (ML) sway range, anterior-posterior (AP) sway range, and center-of-pressure (COP) sway speed variability differed between non-cognitively impaired older adults with minimal-to-no depression (Minimally Depressive group) and mild-to-severe depression (Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 204 community-dwelling older adults were included. Depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), MCI using the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), and static balance metrics using the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS). Mann-Whitney U tests determined differences between groups.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sway area, AP sway range, and ML sway range were significantly greater in the Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group than the Minimally Depressive group (<i>p</i> = 0.010, <i>p</i> = 0.016, and <i>p</i> = 0.031, respectively). Sway distance (<i>p</i> = 0.445) and COP sway speed variability (<i>p</i> = 0.193) were not significantly different between groups.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The findings revealed greater sway area, as well as greater ranges in the AP and ML directions, in the Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group when compared to the Minimally Depressive Group. Reduced concentration and affected postural stabilization mechanisms driven by depression may have attributed to these results.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the need for further understanding of how static balance metrics, such as directional sway, are affected by depression, thereby creating interventions tailored to individual’s postural sway characteristics to help reduce fall risk and improve balance.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05778604).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03144-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Directional postural sway tendencies and static balance among community-dwelling older adults with depression and without cognitive impairment\",\"authors\":\"Jethro Raphael M. Suarez,&nbsp;Veronica B. Decker,&nbsp;Joon-Hyuk Park,&nbsp;Nichole R. Lighthall,&nbsp;Michael Joseph S. Dino,&nbsp;Ladda Thiamwong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03144-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression is prevalent among older adults and is known to negatively affect balance, ultimately leading to falls. However, few studies have investigated the effect of depression on static balance metrics beyond postural sway distance and area of older adults without mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>To investigate if postural sway distance, sway area, medial-lateral (ML) sway range, anterior-posterior (AP) sway range, and center-of-pressure (COP) sway speed variability differed between non-cognitively impaired older adults with minimal-to-no depression (Minimally Depressive group) and mild-to-severe depression (Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 204 community-dwelling older adults were included. Depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), MCI using the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), and static balance metrics using the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS). Mann-Whitney U tests determined differences between groups.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sway area, AP sway range, and ML sway range were significantly greater in the Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group than the Minimally Depressive group (<i>p</i> = 0.010, <i>p</i> = 0.016, and <i>p</i> = 0.031, respectively). Sway distance (<i>p</i> = 0.445) and COP sway speed variability (<i>p</i> = 0.193) were not significantly different between groups.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The findings revealed greater sway area, as well as greater ranges in the AP and ML directions, in the Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group when compared to the Minimally Depressive Group. Reduced concentration and affected postural stabilization mechanisms driven by depression may have attributed to these results.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the need for further understanding of how static balance metrics, such as directional sway, are affected by depression, thereby creating interventions tailored to individual’s postural sway characteristics to help reduce fall risk and improve balance.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05778604).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03144-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03144-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03144-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁症在老年人中很普遍,并且会对平衡产生负面影响,最终导致跌倒。然而,很少有研究调查抑郁症对没有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人的静态平衡指标的影响。目的探讨有无体位摇摆距离、摇摆面积、中侧(ML)摇摆范围、前后(AP)摇摆范围和压力中心(COP)摇摆速度变异性在轻度至无抑郁(轻度抑郁组)和轻度至重度抑郁(轻度至重度抑郁组)的无认知障碍老年人之间的差异。方法对204名社区居住老年人进行调查。使用患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)测量抑郁症,使用Rowland通用痴呆评估量表(RUDAS)测量MCI,使用平衡跟踪系统(BTrackS)测量静态平衡指标。曼-惠特尼U测试确定了各组之间的差异。结果轻度至重度抑郁组的侧偏面积、侧偏范围、侧偏范围均显著大于轻度抑郁组(p = 0.010、p = 0.016、p = 0.031)。摇摆距离(p = 0.445)和COP摇摆速度变异性(p = 0.193)组间无显著差异。研究结果显示,与轻度抑郁组相比,轻度至重度抑郁组的摇摆面积更大,在AP和ML方向上的范围也更大。抑郁导致的注意力下降和姿势稳定机制受到影响可能是导致这些结果的原因。本研究强调需要进一步了解静态平衡指标,如定向摇摆,如何受到抑郁症的影响,从而创建针对个人姿势摇摆特征的干预措施,以帮助减少跌倒风险并改善平衡。试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov (NCT05778604)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Directional postural sway tendencies and static balance among community-dwelling older adults with depression and without cognitive impairment

Background

Depression is prevalent among older adults and is known to negatively affect balance, ultimately leading to falls. However, few studies have investigated the effect of depression on static balance metrics beyond postural sway distance and area of older adults without mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Aims

To investigate if postural sway distance, sway area, medial-lateral (ML) sway range, anterior-posterior (AP) sway range, and center-of-pressure (COP) sway speed variability differed between non-cognitively impaired older adults with minimal-to-no depression (Minimally Depressive group) and mild-to-severe depression (Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group).

Methods

A total of 204 community-dwelling older adults were included. Depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), MCI using the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), and static balance metrics using the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS). Mann-Whitney U tests determined differences between groups.

Results

Sway area, AP sway range, and ML sway range were significantly greater in the Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group than the Minimally Depressive group (p = 0.010, p = 0.016, and p = 0.031, respectively). Sway distance (p = 0.445) and COP sway speed variability (p = 0.193) were not significantly different between groups.

Discussion

The findings revealed greater sway area, as well as greater ranges in the AP and ML directions, in the Mildly-to-Severely Depressive group when compared to the Minimally Depressive Group. Reduced concentration and affected postural stabilization mechanisms driven by depression may have attributed to these results.

Conclusions

This study highlights the need for further understanding of how static balance metrics, such as directional sway, are affected by depression, thereby creating interventions tailored to individual’s postural sway characteristics to help reduce fall risk and improve balance.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05778604).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信