布沙村Haidamatskyi Iar峡谷:地质旅游评价

Q1 Social Sciences
Yulian Braychevskyy , Volodymyr Korinnyi , Olga Kovtoniuk , Nataliia Pohorilchuk
{"title":"布沙村Haidamatskyi Iar峡谷:地质旅游评价","authors":"Yulian Braychevskyy ,&nbsp;Volodymyr Korinnyi ,&nbsp;Olga Kovtoniuk ,&nbsp;Nataliia Pohorilchuk","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this work was to quantitatively assess the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon as a geotourism site, draw attention to geotourism development outside of the Carpathian Mountains region in Ukraine, and further contribute to the assessment methods choice and application debate. We based our analysis on field observations and combined three evaluation algorithms, namely the Kubalikova's method, the geosite assessment model, and the Brilha method. For each algorithm, we presented results as a percentage of the maximum for easier comparison. Our assessment concluded that the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon received rather high scores with all three approaches (86.11% with the Kubalikova's method, 76.88% with Brilha's method, and 62.96% with the geosite assessment model), revealing its strong potential as a geological and geomorphological research and education site. Poor tourist infrastructure (due to the area's peripheral location) and lack of specialized promotional products highlighting geoeducational attractions of the area explained lower scores by the geosite assessment model. Overall, we concluded that the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon was a unique geomorphosite of regional and even national significance. It displayed a wide range of geological features, especially those related to weathering, fluvial, and Aeolian erosion. Its location next to a historical and cultural destination (the village of Busha) made it valuable for geotourism promotion. In the wider context of similar geoattractions in Central and Eastern Europe, our analysis demonstrated the benefits of choosing methods, which were previously applied to comparable geosites. Variation in assessment scores confirmed better reliability of simultaneous application of several assessment methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36117,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 360-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The canyon of Haidamatskyi Iar in the village of Busha: Geotourism assessment\",\"authors\":\"Yulian Braychevskyy ,&nbsp;Volodymyr Korinnyi ,&nbsp;Olga Kovtoniuk ,&nbsp;Nataliia Pohorilchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The purpose of this work was to quantitatively assess the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon as a geotourism site, draw attention to geotourism development outside of the Carpathian Mountains region in Ukraine, and further contribute to the assessment methods choice and application debate. We based our analysis on field observations and combined three evaluation algorithms, namely the Kubalikova's method, the geosite assessment model, and the Brilha method. For each algorithm, we presented results as a percentage of the maximum for easier comparison. Our assessment concluded that the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon received rather high scores with all three approaches (86.11% with the Kubalikova's method, 76.88% with Brilha's method, and 62.96% with the geosite assessment model), revealing its strong potential as a geological and geomorphological research and education site. Poor tourist infrastructure (due to the area's peripheral location) and lack of specialized promotional products highlighting geoeducational attractions of the area explained lower scores by the geosite assessment model. Overall, we concluded that the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon was a unique geomorphosite of regional and even national significance. It displayed a wide range of geological features, especially those related to weathering, fluvial, and Aeolian erosion. Its location next to a historical and cultural destination (the village of Busha) made it valuable for geotourism promotion. In the wider context of similar geoattractions in Central and Eastern Europe, our analysis demonstrated the benefits of choosing methods, which were previously applied to comparable geosites. Variation in assessment scores confirmed better reliability of simultaneous application of several assessment methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 360-371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2577444125000322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2577444125000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在定量评价海达马特斯基峡谷作为地质旅游景点,引起人们对乌克兰喀尔巴阡山脉地区以外地质旅游开发的关注,并进一步促进评价方法的选择和应用辩论。我们在实地观测分析的基础上,结合了Kubalikova方法、场地评价模型和Brilha方法三种评价算法。对于每种算法,我们将结果显示为最大值的百分比,以便于比较。结果表明,三种评价方法对海达马茨基峡谷的评价得分均较高(库巴利科娃评价方法为86.11%,布里哈评价方法为76.88%,地点评价模型为62.96%),显示了其作为地质地貌研究和教育场所的巨大潜力。较差的旅游基础设施(由于该地区的外围位置)和缺乏突出该地区地理教育吸引力的专门宣传产品,解释了地理站点评估模型的较低得分。总之,我们得出结论,海达马茨基峡谷是一个具有区域甚至国家意义的独特地貌。它显示了广泛的地质特征,特别是那些与风化、河流和风成侵蚀有关的地质特征。它毗邻历史文化胜地(布沙村),这对地理旅游推广很有价值。在中欧和东欧类似地理景点的更广泛背景下,我们的分析证明了选择方法的好处,这些方法以前应用于类似的地理景点。评估分数的变化证实了几种评估方法同时应用的可靠性较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The canyon of Haidamatskyi Iar in the village of Busha: Geotourism assessment
The purpose of this work was to quantitatively assess the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon as a geotourism site, draw attention to geotourism development outside of the Carpathian Mountains region in Ukraine, and further contribute to the assessment methods choice and application debate. We based our analysis on field observations and combined three evaluation algorithms, namely the Kubalikova's method, the geosite assessment model, and the Brilha method. For each algorithm, we presented results as a percentage of the maximum for easier comparison. Our assessment concluded that the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon received rather high scores with all three approaches (86.11% with the Kubalikova's method, 76.88% with Brilha's method, and 62.96% with the geosite assessment model), revealing its strong potential as a geological and geomorphological research and education site. Poor tourist infrastructure (due to the area's peripheral location) and lack of specialized promotional products highlighting geoeducational attractions of the area explained lower scores by the geosite assessment model. Overall, we concluded that the Haidamatskyi Iar canyon was a unique geomorphosite of regional and even national significance. It displayed a wide range of geological features, especially those related to weathering, fluvial, and Aeolian erosion. Its location next to a historical and cultural destination (the village of Busha) made it valuable for geotourism promotion. In the wider context of similar geoattractions in Central and Eastern Europe, our analysis demonstrated the benefits of choosing methods, which were previously applied to comparable geosites. Variation in assessment scores confirmed better reliability of simultaneous application of several assessment methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信