考虑模型地空间变异性的地震波相干性评价

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Sugeun Jeong , Yonghee Lee , Yong Jin , Daehyeon Kim
{"title":"考虑模型地空间变异性的地震波相干性评价","authors":"Sugeun Jeong ,&nbsp;Yonghee Lee ,&nbsp;Yong Jin ,&nbsp;Daehyeon Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study experimentally evaluates seismic wave coherency with respect to the spatial variability of model ground using a 1g shaking table and a Laminar Shear Box (LSB). Two types of model grounds, silica sand and weathered soil, were constructed to analyze the effect of spatial variability on seismic wave coherency. The spatial variability was assessed by measuring the shear wave velocity using a Miniature Cone Penetration Test (Mini-CPT). The silica sand model ground exhibited a coefficient of variation (CV) of 18.73 %, indicating relatively homogeneous characteristics, whereas the weathered soil model ground showed a CV of 45.71 %, reflecting high heterogeneity. Unlagged and lagged coherency calculations were performed using 30 scaled seismic records with a peak acceleration of 0.03 g. The results showed that coherency decreased with increasing frequency and separation distance, with a particularly pronounced reduction in the high-frequency range. The weathered soil model ground exhibited a steep decline in coherency above 20 Hz due to its heterogeneous composition, while the silica sand model ground maintained relatively stable coherency across all frequency ranges. The coherency regression analysis was performed in the atanh domain and back-transformed to the original scale for comparison with the measured data. This study highlights the importance of considering spatial variability in seismic design, particularly in high-frequency regions where coherency reduction becomes significant. These findings contribute to developing more reliable site-specific seismic design methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109722"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of seismic wave coherency considering spatial variability of model ground\",\"authors\":\"Sugeun Jeong ,&nbsp;Yonghee Lee ,&nbsp;Yong Jin ,&nbsp;Daehyeon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study experimentally evaluates seismic wave coherency with respect to the spatial variability of model ground using a 1g shaking table and a Laminar Shear Box (LSB). Two types of model grounds, silica sand and weathered soil, were constructed to analyze the effect of spatial variability on seismic wave coherency. The spatial variability was assessed by measuring the shear wave velocity using a Miniature Cone Penetration Test (Mini-CPT). The silica sand model ground exhibited a coefficient of variation (CV) of 18.73 %, indicating relatively homogeneous characteristics, whereas the weathered soil model ground showed a CV of 45.71 %, reflecting high heterogeneity. Unlagged and lagged coherency calculations were performed using 30 scaled seismic records with a peak acceleration of 0.03 g. The results showed that coherency decreased with increasing frequency and separation distance, with a particularly pronounced reduction in the high-frequency range. The weathered soil model ground exhibited a steep decline in coherency above 20 Hz due to its heterogeneous composition, while the silica sand model ground maintained relatively stable coherency across all frequency ranges. The coherency regression analysis was performed in the atanh domain and back-transformed to the original scale for comparison with the measured data. This study highlights the importance of considering spatial variability in seismic design, particularly in high-frequency regions where coherency reduction becomes significant. These findings contribute to developing more reliable site-specific seismic design methodologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125005159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125005159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用1g振动台和层流剪切箱(LSB)对模型地面空间变异性的地震波相干性进行了实验评价。建立了硅砂和风化土两种模型地基,分析了空间变异性对地震波相干性的影响。利用微型锥贯入试验(Mini-CPT)测量剪切波速来评估空间变异性。硅砂模型地基的变异系数(CV)为18.73%,表现出相对均匀的特征,而风化土模型地基的变异系数(CV)为45.71%,表现出较高的异质性。使用峰值加速度为0.03 g的30个缩放地震记录进行无滞后和滞后相干计算。结果表明,相干性随频率和分离距离的增加而降低,在高频范围内降低尤为明显。风化土模型地基在20 Hz以上由于其成分的非均匀性,相干性急剧下降,而硅砂模型地基在所有频率范围内保持相对稳定的相干性。在atanh域进行相干回归分析,并将其反变换到原始尺度,与实测数据进行比较。这项研究强调了在抗震设计中考虑空间变异性的重要性,特别是在高频区域,相干性降低变得明显。这些发现有助于开发更可靠的场地特定地震设计方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of seismic wave coherency considering spatial variability of model ground
This study experimentally evaluates seismic wave coherency with respect to the spatial variability of model ground using a 1g shaking table and a Laminar Shear Box (LSB). Two types of model grounds, silica sand and weathered soil, were constructed to analyze the effect of spatial variability on seismic wave coherency. The spatial variability was assessed by measuring the shear wave velocity using a Miniature Cone Penetration Test (Mini-CPT). The silica sand model ground exhibited a coefficient of variation (CV) of 18.73 %, indicating relatively homogeneous characteristics, whereas the weathered soil model ground showed a CV of 45.71 %, reflecting high heterogeneity. Unlagged and lagged coherency calculations were performed using 30 scaled seismic records with a peak acceleration of 0.03 g. The results showed that coherency decreased with increasing frequency and separation distance, with a particularly pronounced reduction in the high-frequency range. The weathered soil model ground exhibited a steep decline in coherency above 20 Hz due to its heterogeneous composition, while the silica sand model ground maintained relatively stable coherency across all frequency ranges. The coherency regression analysis was performed in the atanh domain and back-transformed to the original scale for comparison with the measured data. This study highlights the importance of considering spatial variability in seismic design, particularly in high-frequency regions where coherency reduction becomes significant. These findings contribute to developing more reliable site-specific seismic design methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信