可持续食物选择的社会互动:满足英国肉类摄入量的目标

IF 3.2 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Angela Fontan , Rosemary Green , Karl H Johansson , Patricia Eustachio Colombo
{"title":"可持续食物选择的社会互动:满足英国肉类摄入量的目标","authors":"Angela Fontan ,&nbsp;Rosemary Green ,&nbsp;Karl H Johansson ,&nbsp;Patricia Eustachio Colombo","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Substantial shifts in contemporary diets are needed to halt the growing burden of chronic diseases and the accelerating climate crisis. Achieving this will require strong action and the use of policy instruments that can aid consumers in making the right dietary choices. Real-life evidence on changing dietary behaviors within complex food systems at scale demands resources and research that might not be realistic to acquire or realize.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This project applied innovative models to predict the dietary and environmental effects of broad-scale strategies designed to transform dietary behaviors among consumers. Scenarios were numerically simulated using agent-based opinion-dynamics models to evaluate the impact of governmental influence on people’s consumption of meat, vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We considered the problem of influencing the opinions of a group of agents (representing the UK population) connected in a social network over a sequence of campaigns to achieve convergence to 2 different targets: achieving the UK Climate Change Committee’s goal of 35% and 50% average reduction in meat consumption by 2030 and 2050, respectively. The opinion dynamics comprised consumers (i.e., agents), with empirically derived baseline food intake patterns (i.e., initial opinions) and sociodemographic attributes. Changes in environmental impacts following changes in consumption were quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a scenario of high governmental influence, uniform in the population, achievement of the 35% and 50% meat reduction goals corresponded to ∼5.2 and ∼8.1 y, respectively. As meat consumption reduced, intake of vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives increased by 84.7%, 108.5%, and 30.8%, respectively (−35% scenario). Greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and scarcity-weighted water were reduced by −23.8%, −20.2%, −0.5%, and −14.5%, respectively (−35% scenario).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of this project provide valuable insights for policymakers and governmental authorities to develop effective influence strategies aimed at promoting healthy and sustainable dietary habits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 107509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Interactions for Sustainable Food Choices: Meeting the Target for Meat Intake in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Angela Fontan ,&nbsp;Rosemary Green ,&nbsp;Karl H Johansson ,&nbsp;Patricia Eustachio Colombo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Substantial shifts in contemporary diets are needed to halt the growing burden of chronic diseases and the accelerating climate crisis. Achieving this will require strong action and the use of policy instruments that can aid consumers in making the right dietary choices. Real-life evidence on changing dietary behaviors within complex food systems at scale demands resources and research that might not be realistic to acquire or realize.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This project applied innovative models to predict the dietary and environmental effects of broad-scale strategies designed to transform dietary behaviors among consumers. Scenarios were numerically simulated using agent-based opinion-dynamics models to evaluate the impact of governmental influence on people’s consumption of meat, vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We considered the problem of influencing the opinions of a group of agents (representing the UK population) connected in a social network over a sequence of campaigns to achieve convergence to 2 different targets: achieving the UK Climate Change Committee’s goal of 35% and 50% average reduction in meat consumption by 2030 and 2050, respectively. The opinion dynamics comprised consumers (i.e., agents), with empirically derived baseline food intake patterns (i.e., initial opinions) and sociodemographic attributes. Changes in environmental impacts following changes in consumption were quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a scenario of high governmental influence, uniform in the population, achievement of the 35% and 50% meat reduction goals corresponded to ∼5.2 and ∼8.1 y, respectively. As meat consumption reduced, intake of vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives increased by 84.7%, 108.5%, and 30.8%, respectively (−35% scenario). Greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and scarcity-weighted water were reduced by −23.8%, −20.2%, −0.5%, and −14.5%, respectively (−35% scenario).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of this project provide valuable insights for policymakers and governmental authorities to develop effective influence strategies aimed at promoting healthy and sustainable dietary habits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 107509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125029701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125029701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当代饮食需要发生重大转变,以遏制日益增长的慢性病负担和不断加剧的气候危机。要实现这一目标,需要采取强有力的行动,并使用能够帮助消费者做出正确饮食选择的政策工具。在复杂的食物系统中大规模改变饮食行为的现实证据需要资源和研究,而获取或实现这些证据可能是不现实的。本项目应用创新模型来预测旨在改变消费者饮食行为的大规模策略对饮食和环境的影响。使用基于主体的意见动力学模型对情景进行数值模拟,以评估政府影响对人们消费肉类、蔬菜、豆类和肉类替代品的影响。方法我们考虑了通过一系列活动影响社会网络中连接的一组代理(代表英国人口)的意见的问题,以实现两个不同目标的融合:分别实现英国气候变化委员会的目标,即到2030年和2050年平均减少35%和50%的肉类消费。意见动态包括消费者(即代理人),经验推导出的基线食物摄入模式(即初始意见)和社会人口属性。对消费变化后的环境影响变化进行了量化。结果:在政府影响力高、人口均匀的情况下,实现35%和50%的肉类减少目标分别对应于~ 5.2和~ 8.1 y。随着肉类消费量的减少,蔬菜、豆类和肉类替代品的摄入量分别增加了84.7%、108.5%和30.8%(−35%情景)。温室气体排放、土地利用、水资源利用和稀缺性加权水分别减少了- 23.8%、- 20.2%、- 0.5%和- 14.5%(- 35%情景)。结论本项目的研究结果为决策者和政府当局制定有效的影响策略提供了宝贵的见解,旨在促进健康和可持续的饮食习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Interactions for Sustainable Food Choices: Meeting the Target for Meat Intake in the United Kingdom

Background

Substantial shifts in contemporary diets are needed to halt the growing burden of chronic diseases and the accelerating climate crisis. Achieving this will require strong action and the use of policy instruments that can aid consumers in making the right dietary choices. Real-life evidence on changing dietary behaviors within complex food systems at scale demands resources and research that might not be realistic to acquire or realize.

Objectives

This project applied innovative models to predict the dietary and environmental effects of broad-scale strategies designed to transform dietary behaviors among consumers. Scenarios were numerically simulated using agent-based opinion-dynamics models to evaluate the impact of governmental influence on people’s consumption of meat, vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives.

Methods

We considered the problem of influencing the opinions of a group of agents (representing the UK population) connected in a social network over a sequence of campaigns to achieve convergence to 2 different targets: achieving the UK Climate Change Committee’s goal of 35% and 50% average reduction in meat consumption by 2030 and 2050, respectively. The opinion dynamics comprised consumers (i.e., agents), with empirically derived baseline food intake patterns (i.e., initial opinions) and sociodemographic attributes. Changes in environmental impacts following changes in consumption were quantified.

Results

In a scenario of high governmental influence, uniform in the population, achievement of the 35% and 50% meat reduction goals corresponded to ∼5.2 and ∼8.1 y, respectively. As meat consumption reduced, intake of vegetables, pulses, and meat alternatives increased by 84.7%, 108.5%, and 30.8%, respectively (−35% scenario). Greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and scarcity-weighted water were reduced by −23.8%, −20.2%, −0.5%, and −14.5%, respectively (−35% scenario).

Conclusions

The findings of this project provide valuable insights for policymakers and governmental authorities to develop effective influence strategies aimed at promoting healthy and sustainable dietary habits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信