职前教师探究性思维技能的发展:揭示过程与挑战

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Guan Ying Li , Bih-Jen Fwu
{"title":"职前教师探究性思维技能的发展:揭示过程与挑战","authors":"Guan Ying Li ,&nbsp;Bih-Jen Fwu","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inquiry-based learning (IBL) has gained popularity globally and has become a focus of curriculum reform initiatives in Confucian-heritage contexts. In Taiwan, the 2019 curriculum reform has positioned inquiry as an interdisciplinary core competency for all preservice teachers. However, previous studies have indicated that preservice teachers face significant challenges during the planning stages of inquiry and have emphasized the need for explicit instruction in teacher education programs. Given that empirical studies addressing these gaps remain limited, the present study employed a case study approach to examine the effectiveness of an inquiry thinking scaffold in a 16-week foundational course in a teacher education program in Taiwan. Analyses of 16 participants’ performance and written reflections revealed that developing a coherent inquiry plan involved a steep learning curve, with challenges emerging in the early stages and evolving as learning progressed. The major challenges included achieving logical coherence and identifying research gaps. The findings support the effectiveness of the thinking scaffold and highlight the importance of fostering preservice teachers’ awareness of logical coherence, as well as engaging them in the process of knowledge construction. Although the effects were limited, this study also found that IBL experience could enhance preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching inquiry. Implications for instructional and curricular adaptations to better integrate inquiry into teacher education programs are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101961"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of preservice teachers’ inquiry thinking skills: Unpacking the processes and challenges\",\"authors\":\"Guan Ying Li ,&nbsp;Bih-Jen Fwu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Inquiry-based learning (IBL) has gained popularity globally and has become a focus of curriculum reform initiatives in Confucian-heritage contexts. In Taiwan, the 2019 curriculum reform has positioned inquiry as an interdisciplinary core competency for all preservice teachers. However, previous studies have indicated that preservice teachers face significant challenges during the planning stages of inquiry and have emphasized the need for explicit instruction in teacher education programs. Given that empirical studies addressing these gaps remain limited, the present study employed a case study approach to examine the effectiveness of an inquiry thinking scaffold in a 16-week foundational course in a teacher education program in Taiwan. Analyses of 16 participants’ performance and written reflections revealed that developing a coherent inquiry plan involved a steep learning curve, with challenges emerging in the early stages and evolving as learning progressed. The major challenges included achieving logical coherence and identifying research gaps. The findings support the effectiveness of the thinking scaffold and highlight the importance of fostering preservice teachers’ awareness of logical coherence, as well as engaging them in the process of knowledge construction. Although the effects were limited, this study also found that IBL experience could enhance preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching inquiry. Implications for instructional and curricular adaptations to better integrate inquiry into teacher education programs are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712500210X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712500210X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究性学习(IBL)已在全球范围内流行起来,并已成为儒家文化背景下课程改革的重点。在台湾,2019年的课程改革将探究定位为所有职前教师的跨学科核心能力。然而,先前的研究表明,职前教师在探究的计划阶段面临着重大挑战,并强调了教师教育计划中明确指导的必要性。鉴于针对这些差距的实证研究仍然有限,本研究采用个案研究方法,在台湾教师教育计划的16周基础课程中检验探究思维支架的有效性。对16名参与者的表现和书面反思的分析表明,制定一个连贯的探究计划涉及一个陡峭的学习曲线,挑战在早期阶段出现,并随着学习的进展而演变。主要挑战包括实现逻辑一致性和确定研究差距。研究结果支持了思维框架的有效性,并强调了培养职前教师的逻辑连贯意识以及让他们参与知识构建过程的重要性。虽然效果有限,但本研究也发现IBL体验可以提高职前教师探究教学的自我效能感。讨论了教学和课程调整的意义,以更好地将探究融入教师教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of preservice teachers’ inquiry thinking skills: Unpacking the processes and challenges
Inquiry-based learning (IBL) has gained popularity globally and has become a focus of curriculum reform initiatives in Confucian-heritage contexts. In Taiwan, the 2019 curriculum reform has positioned inquiry as an interdisciplinary core competency for all preservice teachers. However, previous studies have indicated that preservice teachers face significant challenges during the planning stages of inquiry and have emphasized the need for explicit instruction in teacher education programs. Given that empirical studies addressing these gaps remain limited, the present study employed a case study approach to examine the effectiveness of an inquiry thinking scaffold in a 16-week foundational course in a teacher education program in Taiwan. Analyses of 16 participants’ performance and written reflections revealed that developing a coherent inquiry plan involved a steep learning curve, with challenges emerging in the early stages and evolving as learning progressed. The major challenges included achieving logical coherence and identifying research gaps. The findings support the effectiveness of the thinking scaffold and highlight the importance of fostering preservice teachers’ awareness of logical coherence, as well as engaging them in the process of knowledge construction. Although the effects were limited, this study also found that IBL experience could enhance preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching inquiry. Implications for instructional and curricular adaptations to better integrate inquiry into teacher education programs are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信