消费者协同设计作为一个框架,以增强一个新的自我引导的在线程序,以减少过度消费

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Melissa M. Norberg, Ronan D. King, Alexis Muller
{"title":"消费者协同设计作为一个框架,以增强一个新的自我引导的在线程序,以减少过度消费","authors":"Melissa M. Norberg,&nbsp;Ronan D. King,&nbsp;Alexis Muller","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Breaking Up with Belongings</em> (BB) is the world's first evidence-based, self-directed online program designed to improve emotion regulation and reduce overconsumption. Although initial pilot testing resulted in promising outcomes, user responses suggested that the program could be more engaging, clearer, and relevant to consumers. The objective of this study was to examine whether co-design methodology could be used to meaningfully refine the self-guided online program, by evaluating both the changes made and the experiences of those involved. Over the course of nine months and five workshops, consumers and researchers collaboratively revised the program. The original program was refined and expanded to include simplified language, clearer and more detailed instructions and descriptions, more frequent references to the Australian context, and a new module on <em>Waste and its Solutions</em>. We then assessed the effectiveness of our co-design procedures by evaluating the usability and impact of program revisions, the dynamics between researchers and consumers, and consumer experiences. Consumers determined that the co-design process was effective, citing the lead researcher's expert facilitation as a key factor. This leadership fostered a collaborative and respectful environment that empowered all consumers to engage meaningfully in the procedures, processes, and outcomes. As demonstrated by this study, an iterative co-design process can generate valuable insights for intervention refinement. Consumers value their role as co-designers and respected contributors to research. By using a collaborative, grass-roots approach, researchers can ensure that their programs are clear, relevant, and engaging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer co-design as a framework for enhancing a novel self-guided online program to reduce overconsumption\",\"authors\":\"Melissa M. Norberg,&nbsp;Ronan D. King,&nbsp;Alexis Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Breaking Up with Belongings</em> (BB) is the world's first evidence-based, self-directed online program designed to improve emotion regulation and reduce overconsumption. Although initial pilot testing resulted in promising outcomes, user responses suggested that the program could be more engaging, clearer, and relevant to consumers. The objective of this study was to examine whether co-design methodology could be used to meaningfully refine the self-guided online program, by evaluating both the changes made and the experiences of those involved. Over the course of nine months and five workshops, consumers and researchers collaboratively revised the program. The original program was refined and expanded to include simplified language, clearer and more detailed instructions and descriptions, more frequent references to the Australian context, and a new module on <em>Waste and its Solutions</em>. We then assessed the effectiveness of our co-design procedures by evaluating the usability and impact of program revisions, the dynamics between researchers and consumers, and consumer experiences. Consumers determined that the co-design process was effective, citing the lead researcher's expert facilitation as a key factor. This leadership fostered a collaborative and respectful environment that empowered all consumers to engage meaningfully in the procedures, processes, and outcomes. As demonstrated by this study, an iterative co-design process can generate valuable insights for intervention refinement. Consumers value their role as co-designers and respected contributors to research. By using a collaborative, grass-roots approach, researchers can ensure that their programs are clear, relevant, and engaging.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000626\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“与财物分手”(BB)是世界上第一个以证据为基础、自我导向的在线课程,旨在提高情绪调节能力,减少过度消费。虽然最初的试点测试取得了可喜的结果,但用户的反应表明,该计划可以更吸引人、更清晰、更贴近消费者。本研究的目的是通过评估所做的改变和参与者的经验,来检验共同设计方法是否可以用于有意义地改进自我指导的在线课程。在九个月和五次研讨会的过程中,消费者和研究人员合作修改了该计划。最初的计划经过改进和扩展,包括简化的语言,更清晰和更详细的说明和描述,更多地参考澳大利亚的情况,以及一个关于废物及其解决方案的新模块。然后,我们通过评估程序修订的可用性和影响、研究人员和消费者之间的动态以及消费者体验来评估我们共同设计程序的有效性。消费者认为共同设计过程是有效的,并将首席研究员的专家指导作为关键因素。这种领导培养了一种协作和尊重的环境,使所有消费者都能有意义地参与到程序、过程和结果中来。正如本研究所证明的那样,迭代的协同设计过程可以为干预改进产生有价值的见解。消费者重视他们作为共同设计者和受人尊敬的研究贡献者的角色。通过采用协作的、基层的方法,研究人员可以确保他们的项目是清晰的、相关的和吸引人的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consumer co-design as a framework for enhancing a novel self-guided online program to reduce overconsumption
Breaking Up with Belongings (BB) is the world's first evidence-based, self-directed online program designed to improve emotion regulation and reduce overconsumption. Although initial pilot testing resulted in promising outcomes, user responses suggested that the program could be more engaging, clearer, and relevant to consumers. The objective of this study was to examine whether co-design methodology could be used to meaningfully refine the self-guided online program, by evaluating both the changes made and the experiences of those involved. Over the course of nine months and five workshops, consumers and researchers collaboratively revised the program. The original program was refined and expanded to include simplified language, clearer and more detailed instructions and descriptions, more frequent references to the Australian context, and a new module on Waste and its Solutions. We then assessed the effectiveness of our co-design procedures by evaluating the usability and impact of program revisions, the dynamics between researchers and consumers, and consumer experiences. Consumers determined that the co-design process was effective, citing the lead researcher's expert facilitation as a key factor. This leadership fostered a collaborative and respectful environment that empowered all consumers to engage meaningfully in the procedures, processes, and outcomes. As demonstrated by this study, an iterative co-design process can generate valuable insights for intervention refinement. Consumers value their role as co-designers and respected contributors to research. By using a collaborative, grass-roots approach, researchers can ensure that their programs are clear, relevant, and engaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信