{"title":"十字路口的可持续发展:地缘政治风险、自然资源稀缺和能源安全转型中的可再生能源","authors":"Jinjun Zhang , Liu Xiao-feng","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy security is a crucial aspect of modern societies, as it directly impacts the availability, accessibility, and reliability of energy sources. The reliance on natural resources and geopolitical factors in shaping energy security has gained significant attention in recent years. Natural resources and geopolitical risk are examined in 38 countries at risk of geopolitical conflict between 1990 and 2021 by examining CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, renewable energy consumption, and foreign direct investment as controlling variables. The long-run analysis conducted in this study focused on slope heterogeneity, Westerlund cointegration, and dynamic panel data estimation. The findings indicated that the energy security index is positively associated with various determinants, including natural resources, geopolitical risk, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and renewable energy consumption. However, foreign direct investment was found to be negatively associated with the energy security index among the selected 38 geopolitical risk countries. The role of natural resources and geopolitical risk in energy security cannot be overlooked. Natural resources provide the raw materials for generating electricity and powering our societies, while geopolitical risks can disrupt energy supply chains and threaten stability. Achieving sustainable energy security requires a comprehensive approach that addresses both aspects of energy provision. Transitioning to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, diversifying energy supplies, promoting international cooperation, and conserving natural resources are essential steps towards a more sustainable and resilient energy future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"16 5","pages":"Article 102129"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable development at the crossroads: Geopolitical risks, natural resource scarcity, and renewable energy in energy security transitions\",\"authors\":\"Jinjun Zhang , Liu Xiao-feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy security is a crucial aspect of modern societies, as it directly impacts the availability, accessibility, and reliability of energy sources. The reliance on natural resources and geopolitical factors in shaping energy security has gained significant attention in recent years. Natural resources and geopolitical risk are examined in 38 countries at risk of geopolitical conflict between 1990 and 2021 by examining CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, renewable energy consumption, and foreign direct investment as controlling variables. The long-run analysis conducted in this study focused on slope heterogeneity, Westerlund cointegration, and dynamic panel data estimation. The findings indicated that the energy security index is positively associated with various determinants, including natural resources, geopolitical risk, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and renewable energy consumption. However, foreign direct investment was found to be negatively associated with the energy security index among the selected 38 geopolitical risk countries. The role of natural resources and geopolitical risk in energy security cannot be overlooked. Natural resources provide the raw materials for generating electricity and powering our societies, while geopolitical risks can disrupt energy supply chains and threaten stability. Achieving sustainable energy security requires a comprehensive approach that addresses both aspects of energy provision. Transitioning to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, diversifying energy supplies, promoting international cooperation, and conserving natural resources are essential steps towards a more sustainable and resilient energy future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoscience frontiers\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoscience frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987125001343\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987125001343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sustainable development at the crossroads: Geopolitical risks, natural resource scarcity, and renewable energy in energy security transitions
Energy security is a crucial aspect of modern societies, as it directly impacts the availability, accessibility, and reliability of energy sources. The reliance on natural resources and geopolitical factors in shaping energy security has gained significant attention in recent years. Natural resources and geopolitical risk are examined in 38 countries at risk of geopolitical conflict between 1990 and 2021 by examining CO2 emissions, renewable energy consumption, and foreign direct investment as controlling variables. The long-run analysis conducted in this study focused on slope heterogeneity, Westerlund cointegration, and dynamic panel data estimation. The findings indicated that the energy security index is positively associated with various determinants, including natural resources, geopolitical risk, CO2 emissions, and renewable energy consumption. However, foreign direct investment was found to be negatively associated with the energy security index among the selected 38 geopolitical risk countries. The role of natural resources and geopolitical risk in energy security cannot be overlooked. Natural resources provide the raw materials for generating electricity and powering our societies, while geopolitical risks can disrupt energy supply chains and threaten stability. Achieving sustainable energy security requires a comprehensive approach that addresses both aspects of energy provision. Transitioning to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, diversifying energy supplies, promoting international cooperation, and conserving natural resources are essential steps towards a more sustainable and resilient energy future.
Geoscience frontiersEarth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.