Laura Terragni , Anne Lene Løvhaug , Ellen Bjørkum , Aysha Grönberg , Siri Bjerkheim , Kaja Lund-Iversen , Marianne S. Morseth
{"title":"确定可持续性标签的偏好和措施,以增加挪威消费者的可持续食品消费","authors":"Laura Terragni , Anne Lene Løvhaug , Ellen Bjørkum , Aysha Grönberg , Siri Bjerkheim , Kaja Lund-Iversen , Marianne S. Morseth","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Sustainability includes social, health, and environmental aspects. Sustainability labels enable consumers to make more sustainable food choices. This study assessed how a representative sample of Norwegian consumers valued different sustainability dimensions and identified their preferences for the number of dimensions to include in a potential sustainability label for food, identified groups of consumers who want information regarding different dimensions of sustainability when purchasing food, and identified potential measures to increase sustainable food consumption as part of the NewTools project.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Less food waste (53 %) and animal welfare (50 %) were deemed the most important dimensions for a sustainable food system, while reduced meat production (21 %) and organic production (18 %) the least important dimensions. A single label that includes information on social and environmental sustainability and healthiness of food was the most preferred (23 %). Those who perceived that their present diet was sustainable had higher odds of wanting information regarding environmental sustainability (OR 2.91, C·I 1.75, 4.86), social sustainability (OR 3.24, C·I 1.97, 5.31) and health (OR 2.42, C·I 1.33, 4.41) when purchasing food compared to those who perceived that they consumed a less sustainable diet. Finally, the most widely supported measure for increasing sustainable food consumption was lowering prices (57 %) and more time for cooking among those who reported consuming less sustainable diets (20 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While more comprehensive sustainability labeling is favored, it will likely benefit those who already consume sustainable diets. Future research should investigate measures related to, for example, price and convenience to target less motivated consumers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 105673"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying preferences for sustainability labeling and measures to increase sustainable food consumption among Norwegian consumers\",\"authors\":\"Laura Terragni , Anne Lene Løvhaug , Ellen Bjørkum , Aysha Grönberg , Siri Bjerkheim , Kaja Lund-Iversen , Marianne S. Morseth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Sustainability includes social, health, and environmental aspects. Sustainability labels enable consumers to make more sustainable food choices. This study assessed how a representative sample of Norwegian consumers valued different sustainability dimensions and identified their preferences for the number of dimensions to include in a potential sustainability label for food, identified groups of consumers who want information regarding different dimensions of sustainability when purchasing food, and identified potential measures to increase sustainable food consumption as part of the NewTools project.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Less food waste (53 %) and animal welfare (50 %) were deemed the most important dimensions for a sustainable food system, while reduced meat production (21 %) and organic production (18 %) the least important dimensions. A single label that includes information on social and environmental sustainability and healthiness of food was the most preferred (23 %). Those who perceived that their present diet was sustainable had higher odds of wanting information regarding environmental sustainability (OR 2.91, C·I 1.75, 4.86), social sustainability (OR 3.24, C·I 1.97, 5.31) and health (OR 2.42, C·I 1.33, 4.41) when purchasing food compared to those who perceived that they consumed a less sustainable diet. Finally, the most widely supported measure for increasing sustainable food consumption was lowering prices (57 %) and more time for cooking among those who reported consuming less sustainable diets (20 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While more comprehensive sustainability labeling is favored, it will likely benefit those who already consume sustainable diets. Future research should investigate measures related to, for example, price and convenience to target less motivated consumers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002484\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002484","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying preferences for sustainability labeling and measures to increase sustainable food consumption among Norwegian consumers
Purpose
Sustainability includes social, health, and environmental aspects. Sustainability labels enable consumers to make more sustainable food choices. This study assessed how a representative sample of Norwegian consumers valued different sustainability dimensions and identified their preferences for the number of dimensions to include in a potential sustainability label for food, identified groups of consumers who want information regarding different dimensions of sustainability when purchasing food, and identified potential measures to increase sustainable food consumption as part of the NewTools project.
Results
Less food waste (53 %) and animal welfare (50 %) were deemed the most important dimensions for a sustainable food system, while reduced meat production (21 %) and organic production (18 %) the least important dimensions. A single label that includes information on social and environmental sustainability and healthiness of food was the most preferred (23 %). Those who perceived that their present diet was sustainable had higher odds of wanting information regarding environmental sustainability (OR 2.91, C·I 1.75, 4.86), social sustainability (OR 3.24, C·I 1.97, 5.31) and health (OR 2.42, C·I 1.33, 4.41) when purchasing food compared to those who perceived that they consumed a less sustainable diet. Finally, the most widely supported measure for increasing sustainable food consumption was lowering prices (57 %) and more time for cooking among those who reported consuming less sustainable diets (20 %).
Conclusion
While more comprehensive sustainability labeling is favored, it will likely benefit those who already consume sustainable diets. Future research should investigate measures related to, for example, price and convenience to target less motivated consumers.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.