在统一协议中测试对情绪和技能使用的厌恶反应的相互体内变化

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hannah E. Croom, Matthew W. Southward, Shannon Sauer-Zavala
{"title":"在统一协议中测试对情绪和技能使用的厌恶反应的相互体内变化","authors":"Hannah E. Croom,&nbsp;Matthew W. Southward,&nbsp;Shannon Sauer-Zavala","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emotional disorders are thought to be maintained in large part by the experience of frequent and intense negative emotions and aversive reactions to these emotions. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) was designed to teach patients skills to manage aversive reactions and reduce the frequency and intensity of negative emotions. However, it is unclear how skill use and aversive reactions are related to each other in this treatment. Participants (<em>N</em> = 70; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 33.75, 67% female, 74% White, 74% heterosexual) completed measures of aversive reactivity, skillfulness, anxiety, and depression before each session. We used hierarchical linear modeling to explore if within-person changes in aversive reactivity predicted residualized session-to-session changes in skill use and if within-person changes in skill use predicted residualized session-to-session changes in aversive reactivity. We then used multilevel mediation analyses to test whether aversive reactivity or skill use mediated the effect of the other construct on changes in anxiety and depression. Within-person increases in skillfulness significantly predicted session-to-session improvements in cognitive skills and mindfulness but did not predict improvements in any aspect of aversive reactivity. Within-person changes in aversive reactivity did not significantly predict changes in skillfulness. Between-person changes in skillfulness were significantly related to changes in between-person aversive reactivity. Only the indirect effect of skillfulness through mindfulness on anxiety/depression was significant. These results suggest that aversive reactivity and skillfulness may be relatively independent constructs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 5","pages":"Pages 1014-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Reciprocal Within-Person Changes in Aversive Reactions to Emotions and Skill Use in the Unified Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Hannah E. Croom,&nbsp;Matthew W. Southward,&nbsp;Shannon Sauer-Zavala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beth.2025.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Emotional disorders are thought to be maintained in large part by the experience of frequent and intense negative emotions and aversive reactions to these emotions. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) was designed to teach patients skills to manage aversive reactions and reduce the frequency and intensity of negative emotions. However, it is unclear how skill use and aversive reactions are related to each other in this treatment. Participants (<em>N</em> = 70; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 33.75, 67% female, 74% White, 74% heterosexual) completed measures of aversive reactivity, skillfulness, anxiety, and depression before each session. We used hierarchical linear modeling to explore if within-person changes in aversive reactivity predicted residualized session-to-session changes in skill use and if within-person changes in skill use predicted residualized session-to-session changes in aversive reactivity. We then used multilevel mediation analyses to test whether aversive reactivity or skill use mediated the effect of the other construct on changes in anxiety and depression. Within-person increases in skillfulness significantly predicted session-to-session improvements in cognitive skills and mindfulness but did not predict improvements in any aspect of aversive reactivity. Within-person changes in aversive reactivity did not significantly predict changes in skillfulness. Between-person changes in skillfulness were significantly related to changes in between-person aversive reactivity. Only the indirect effect of skillfulness through mindfulness on anxiety/depression was significant. These results suggest that aversive reactivity and skillfulness may be relatively independent constructs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1014-1024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789425000395\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789425000395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情绪障碍被认为在很大程度上是由频繁而强烈的负面情绪和对这些情绪的厌恶反应所维持的。《情绪障碍跨诊断治疗统一方案》(Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders, UP)旨在教授患者管理厌恶反应的技能,并减少负面情绪的频率和强度。然而,目前尚不清楚在这种治疗中,技巧使用和厌恶反应是如何相互关联的。参与者(N = 70;法师 = 33.75,女性67%,白人74%,异性恋74%)在每次会议前完成厌恶反应性,技巧,焦虑和抑郁的测量。我们使用层次线性模型来探索个人内部厌恶反应的变化是否预测了技能使用的剩余会话变化,以及个人内部技能使用的变化是否预测了厌恶反应的剩余会话变化。然后,我们使用多层次中介分析来检验厌恶反应性或技能使用是否介导了其他构式对焦虑和抑郁变化的影响。面对面技巧的提高显著预测了认知技能和正念的逐次改善,但并不能预测任何方面的厌恶反应的改善。个人厌恶反应的变化并不能显著预测技巧的变化。人际间技巧的变化与人际间厌恶反应的变化显著相关。只有技巧通过正念对焦虑/抑郁的间接影响是显著的。这些结果表明,厌恶反应性和熟练性可能是相对独立的构念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing Reciprocal Within-Person Changes in Aversive Reactions to Emotions and Skill Use in the Unified Protocol
Emotional disorders are thought to be maintained in large part by the experience of frequent and intense negative emotions and aversive reactions to these emotions. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) was designed to teach patients skills to manage aversive reactions and reduce the frequency and intensity of negative emotions. However, it is unclear how skill use and aversive reactions are related to each other in this treatment. Participants (N = 70; Mage = 33.75, 67% female, 74% White, 74% heterosexual) completed measures of aversive reactivity, skillfulness, anxiety, and depression before each session. We used hierarchical linear modeling to explore if within-person changes in aversive reactivity predicted residualized session-to-session changes in skill use and if within-person changes in skill use predicted residualized session-to-session changes in aversive reactivity. We then used multilevel mediation analyses to test whether aversive reactivity or skill use mediated the effect of the other construct on changes in anxiety and depression. Within-person increases in skillfulness significantly predicted session-to-session improvements in cognitive skills and mindfulness but did not predict improvements in any aspect of aversive reactivity. Within-person changes in aversive reactivity did not significantly predict changes in skillfulness. Between-person changes in skillfulness were significantly related to changes in between-person aversive reactivity. Only the indirect effect of skillfulness through mindfulness on anxiety/depression was significant. These results suggest that aversive reactivity and skillfulness may be relatively independent constructs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信