奇亚蛋白生产的脱脂策略:对理化性质的影响

IF 8.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Simon Dirr , Ozlem Ozmutlu Karslioglu , Elif Gokcen Ates , Mecit H. Oztop
{"title":"奇亚蛋白生产的脱脂策略:对理化性质的影响","authors":"Simon Dirr ,&nbsp;Ozlem Ozmutlu Karslioglu ,&nbsp;Elif Gokcen Ates ,&nbsp;Mecit H. Oztop","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for sustainable plant-based proteins has highlighted chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.), offering 18–32 % protein content. This study evaluates protein extraction efficiency and functional properties across two types of chia product: organic partially defatted flour (O) and conventional whole full-fat seeds (C). Defatting methods included mechanical cold pressing (O_PD), hexane extraction (O_HEX, C_HEX), supercritical CO₂ with ethanol (C_SCF), and a non-defatted control (C_ND). Hexane extraction achieved the highest protein content (O_HEX: 67.1 %; C_HEX: 63.9 %) and foaming stability (76.85 %, 75.00 %), with minimal residual fat (0.10–0.40 %). Supercritical CO₂ yielded the highest protein recovery (44.6 %) and emulsion capacity (203.17 %), while O_PD and C_ND showed superior solubility at neutral pH. Functional properties varied significantly: O_HEX exhibited the highest water-holding capacity (794.86 %), and C_HEX demonstrated peak oil-binding capacity (473.92 %). These findings shows that both seed types and defatting method critically influence protein yield and functionality. While hexane extraction maximizes efficiency, its environmental drawbacks position supercritical CO₂ as an eco-friendly alternative, despite solubility trade-offs. This study provides actionable insights for optimizing plant-based protein ingredients by balancing extraction efficiency, functional performance, and sustainability goals across chia seed sources and processing technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100729"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defatting strategies for chia protein production: effects on physicochemical properties\",\"authors\":\"Simon Dirr ,&nbsp;Ozlem Ozmutlu Karslioglu ,&nbsp;Elif Gokcen Ates ,&nbsp;Mecit H. Oztop\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing demand for sustainable plant-based proteins has highlighted chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.), offering 18–32 % protein content. This study evaluates protein extraction efficiency and functional properties across two types of chia product: organic partially defatted flour (O) and conventional whole full-fat seeds (C). Defatting methods included mechanical cold pressing (O_PD), hexane extraction (O_HEX, C_HEX), supercritical CO₂ with ethanol (C_SCF), and a non-defatted control (C_ND). Hexane extraction achieved the highest protein content (O_HEX: 67.1 %; C_HEX: 63.9 %) and foaming stability (76.85 %, 75.00 %), with minimal residual fat (0.10–0.40 %). Supercritical CO₂ yielded the highest protein recovery (44.6 %) and emulsion capacity (203.17 %), while O_PD and C_ND showed superior solubility at neutral pH. Functional properties varied significantly: O_HEX exhibited the highest water-holding capacity (794.86 %), and C_HEX demonstrated peak oil-binding capacity (473.92 %). These findings shows that both seed types and defatting method critically influence protein yield and functionality. While hexane extraction maximizes efficiency, its environmental drawbacks position supercritical CO₂ as an eco-friendly alternative, despite solubility trade-offs. This study provides actionable insights for optimizing plant-based protein ingredients by balancing extraction efficiency, functional performance, and sustainability goals across chia seed sources and processing technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Foods\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525001881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525001881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对可持续植物性蛋白质的需求日益增长,其中以鼠尾草籽(Salvia hispanica L.)为重点,其蛋白质含量为18 - 32%。本研究评估了有机部分脱脂面粉(O)和传统全脂籽(C)两种奇亚产品的蛋白质提取效率和功能特性。脱脂方法包括机械冷压(O_PD),己烷萃取(O_HEX, C_HEX),超临界co2与乙醇(C_SCF)和非脱脂对照(C_ND)。正己烷萃取法获得了最高的蛋白质含量(O_HEX: 67.1%; C_HEX: 63.9%)和泡沫稳定性(76.85%,75.00%),残余脂肪最少(0.10 - 0.40%)。超临界co2的蛋白质回收率最高(44.6%),乳化能力最高(203.17%),而O_PD和C_ND在中性ph下具有较好的溶解度。功能性质差异显著:O_HEX具有最高的持水能力(794.86%),C_HEX具有最高的油结合能力(473.92%)。这些发现表明,种子类型和脱脂方法对蛋白质产量和功能都有重要影响。虽然己烷萃取效率最高,但其环境缺点使超临界二氧化碳成为环保的替代品,尽管溶解度需要权衡。本研究通过平衡奇亚籽来源和加工技术的提取效率、功能性能和可持续性目标,为优化植物蛋白成分提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defatting strategies for chia protein production: effects on physicochemical properties
The growing demand for sustainable plant-based proteins has highlighted chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.), offering 18–32 % protein content. This study evaluates protein extraction efficiency and functional properties across two types of chia product: organic partially defatted flour (O) and conventional whole full-fat seeds (C). Defatting methods included mechanical cold pressing (O_PD), hexane extraction (O_HEX, C_HEX), supercritical CO₂ with ethanol (C_SCF), and a non-defatted control (C_ND). Hexane extraction achieved the highest protein content (O_HEX: 67.1 %; C_HEX: 63.9 %) and foaming stability (76.85 %, 75.00 %), with minimal residual fat (0.10–0.40 %). Supercritical CO₂ yielded the highest protein recovery (44.6 %) and emulsion capacity (203.17 %), while O_PD and C_ND showed superior solubility at neutral pH. Functional properties varied significantly: O_HEX exhibited the highest water-holding capacity (794.86 %), and C_HEX demonstrated peak oil-binding capacity (473.92 %). These findings shows that both seed types and defatting method critically influence protein yield and functionality. While hexane extraction maximizes efficiency, its environmental drawbacks position supercritical CO₂ as an eco-friendly alternative, despite solubility trade-offs. This study provides actionable insights for optimizing plant-based protein ingredients by balancing extraction efficiency, functional performance, and sustainability goals across chia seed sources and processing technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Foods is a specialized journal that is dedicated to tackling the challenges posed by climate change and the need for sustainability in the realm of food production. The journal recognizes the imperative to transform current food manufacturing and consumption practices to meet the dietary needs of a burgeoning global population while simultaneously curbing environmental degradation. The mission of Future Foods is to disseminate research that aligns with the goal of fostering the development of innovative technologies and alternative food sources to establish more sustainable food systems. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the advancement of sustainable food practices. Abstracting and indexing: Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) SNIP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信