先验信念在因果幻觉中的作用

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
David W. Ng , Jessica C. Lee , Peter F. Lovibond
{"title":"先验信念在因果幻觉中的作用","authors":"David W. Ng ,&nbsp;Jessica C. Lee ,&nbsp;Peter F. Lovibond","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When people are shown a series of trials on which a cue and outcome are objectively unrelated (a null contingency), they often judge the causal strength of the cue to be positive, a phenomenon referred to as a causal illusion. This task has been taken as a laboratory model of the development of false causal beliefs. However, in three experiments, we found that participants reliably provided a positive causal rating for the cue <em>prior to</em> any trials having been experienced. Over null contingency trials, participants partially corrected their predictions of the outcome, but maintained their positive causal beliefs, especially with high (75 %) cue and outcome densities. An attempt to reduce the positive prior belief by scenario instructions was unsuccessful. Pre-training with a genuine positive or negative contingency modulated causal ratings in the expected direction, but did not alter the final causal bias. These results suggest that causal illusions may not be acquired but represent a failure to correct an initial positive prior belief.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 106290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of prior beliefs in causal illusions\",\"authors\":\"David W. Ng ,&nbsp;Jessica C. Lee ,&nbsp;Peter F. Lovibond\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>When people are shown a series of trials on which a cue and outcome are objectively unrelated (a null contingency), they often judge the causal strength of the cue to be positive, a phenomenon referred to as a causal illusion. This task has been taken as a laboratory model of the development of false causal beliefs. However, in three experiments, we found that participants reliably provided a positive causal rating for the cue <em>prior to</em> any trials having been experienced. Over null contingency trials, participants partially corrected their predictions of the outcome, but maintained their positive causal beliefs, especially with high (75 %) cue and outcome densities. An attempt to reduce the positive prior belief by scenario instructions was unsuccessful. Pre-training with a genuine positive or negative contingency modulated causal ratings in the expected direction, but did not alter the final causal bias. These results suggest that causal illusions may not be acquired but represent a failure to correct an initial positive prior belief.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition\",\"volume\":\"266 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725002306\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725002306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当人们看到一系列提示和结果客观上不相关的试验(零偶然性)时,他们通常会判断提示的因果强度是积极的,这种现象被称为因果错觉。这个任务被作为错误因果信念发展的实验室模型。然而,在三个实验中,我们发现参与者在经历任何试验之前都可靠地为线索提供了积极的因果评级。在零偶然性试验中,参与者部分纠正了他们对结果的预测,但保持了积极的因果信念,特别是在线索和结果密度高(75%)的情况下。试图通过情景指令减少积极先验信念的尝试失败了。具有真正的积极或消极偶然性的预训练在预期方向上调节因果评级,但没有改变最终的因果偏差。这些结果表明,因果错觉可能无法获得,但代表了纠正初始积极先验信念的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of prior beliefs in causal illusions
When people are shown a series of trials on which a cue and outcome are objectively unrelated (a null contingency), they often judge the causal strength of the cue to be positive, a phenomenon referred to as a causal illusion. This task has been taken as a laboratory model of the development of false causal beliefs. However, in three experiments, we found that participants reliably provided a positive causal rating for the cue prior to any trials having been experienced. Over null contingency trials, participants partially corrected their predictions of the outcome, but maintained their positive causal beliefs, especially with high (75 %) cue and outcome densities. An attempt to reduce the positive prior belief by scenario instructions was unsuccessful. Pre-training with a genuine positive or negative contingency modulated causal ratings in the expected direction, but did not alter the final causal bias. These results suggest that causal illusions may not be acquired but represent a failure to correct an initial positive prior belief.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信