Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi, Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma, Andre Brown
{"title":"建筑行业新型再生供应链管理实践实施的多层次层次决策框架","authors":"Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi, Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma, Andre Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As environmental challenges intensify and natural resources decline, the construction industry must move beyond sustainability efforts, which often focus on minimizing harm, towards regenerative approaches that actively restore ecosystems and enhance environmental well-being. However, the lack of a structured framework to assess and implement regenerative supply chain management (RSCM) practices remains a significant barrier. This study addresses this gap by developing a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide the prioritization and adoption of regenerative strategies across the construction supply chain. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed, combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assign weights to regenerative performance criteria, and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) to evaluate and rank newly developed RSCM practices. Expert input from regenerative construction professionals informed the criteria selection and evaluation process. Results highlight “designing with nature” as the top priority in the design phase, biodegradable materials in purchasing, and strategic transport planning in the transportation stage. In construction and end-of-life stages, the top practices include modular construction and prioritizing disassembly and material recovery. The research findings provide a robust, data-driven tool for embedding regenerative principles into construction supply chains and informs both policy and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 108128"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-level hierarchy decision-making framework for the implementation of novel regenerative supply chain management practices in construction\",\"authors\":\"Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi, Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma, Andre Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As environmental challenges intensify and natural resources decline, the construction industry must move beyond sustainability efforts, which often focus on minimizing harm, towards regenerative approaches that actively restore ecosystems and enhance environmental well-being. However, the lack of a structured framework to assess and implement regenerative supply chain management (RSCM) practices remains a significant barrier. This study addresses this gap by developing a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide the prioritization and adoption of regenerative strategies across the construction supply chain. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed, combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assign weights to regenerative performance criteria, and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) to evaluate and rank newly developed RSCM practices. Expert input from regenerative construction professionals informed the criteria selection and evaluation process. Results highlight “designing with nature” as the top priority in the design phase, biodegradable materials in purchasing, and strategic transport planning in the transportation stage. In construction and end-of-life stages, the top practices include modular construction and prioritizing disassembly and material recovery. The research findings provide a robust, data-driven tool for embedding regenerative principles into construction supply chains and informs both policy and practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003257\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A multi-level hierarchy decision-making framework for the implementation of novel regenerative supply chain management practices in construction
As environmental challenges intensify and natural resources decline, the construction industry must move beyond sustainability efforts, which often focus on minimizing harm, towards regenerative approaches that actively restore ecosystems and enhance environmental well-being. However, the lack of a structured framework to assess and implement regenerative supply chain management (RSCM) practices remains a significant barrier. This study addresses this gap by developing a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide the prioritization and adoption of regenerative strategies across the construction supply chain. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed, combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assign weights to regenerative performance criteria, and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) to evaluate and rank newly developed RSCM practices. Expert input from regenerative construction professionals informed the criteria selection and evaluation process. Results highlight “designing with nature” as the top priority in the design phase, biodegradable materials in purchasing, and strategic transport planning in the transportation stage. In construction and end-of-life stages, the top practices include modular construction and prioritizing disassembly and material recovery. The research findings provide a robust, data-driven tool for embedding regenerative principles into construction supply chains and informs both policy and practice.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.