建筑行业新型再生供应链管理实践实施的多层次层次决策框架

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi, Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma, Andre Brown
{"title":"建筑行业新型再生供应链管理实践实施的多层次层次决策框架","authors":"Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi,&nbsp;Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma,&nbsp;Andre Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As environmental challenges intensify and natural resources decline, the construction industry must move beyond sustainability efforts, which often focus on minimizing harm, towards regenerative approaches that actively restore ecosystems and enhance environmental well-being. However, the lack of a structured framework to assess and implement regenerative supply chain management (RSCM) practices remains a significant barrier. This study addresses this gap by developing a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide the prioritization and adoption of regenerative strategies across the construction supply chain. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed, combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assign weights to regenerative performance criteria, and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) to evaluate and rank newly developed RSCM practices. Expert input from regenerative construction professionals informed the criteria selection and evaluation process. Results highlight “designing with nature” as the top priority in the design phase, biodegradable materials in purchasing, and strategic transport planning in the transportation stage. In construction and end-of-life stages, the top practices include modular construction and prioritizing disassembly and material recovery. The research findings provide a robust, data-driven tool for embedding regenerative principles into construction supply chains and informs both policy and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 108128"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-level hierarchy decision-making framework for the implementation of novel regenerative supply chain management practices in construction\",\"authors\":\"Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi,&nbsp;Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma,&nbsp;Andre Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As environmental challenges intensify and natural resources decline, the construction industry must move beyond sustainability efforts, which often focus on minimizing harm, towards regenerative approaches that actively restore ecosystems and enhance environmental well-being. However, the lack of a structured framework to assess and implement regenerative supply chain management (RSCM) practices remains a significant barrier. This study addresses this gap by developing a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide the prioritization and adoption of regenerative strategies across the construction supply chain. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed, combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assign weights to regenerative performance criteria, and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) to evaluate and rank newly developed RSCM practices. Expert input from regenerative construction professionals informed the criteria selection and evaluation process. Results highlight “designing with nature” as the top priority in the design phase, biodegradable materials in purchasing, and strategic transport planning in the transportation stage. In construction and end-of-life stages, the top practices include modular construction and prioritizing disassembly and material recovery. The research findings provide a robust, data-driven tool for embedding regenerative principles into construction supply chains and informs both policy and practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003257\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着环境挑战的加剧和自然资源的减少,建筑行业必须超越可持续发展的努力,通常侧重于减少危害,转向积极恢复生态系统和增强环境福祉的再生方法。然而,缺乏一个结构化的框架来评估和实施再生供应链管理(RSCM)实践仍然是一个重大障碍。本研究通过开发一个全面的决策框架来指导整个建筑供应链中再生战略的优先级和采用,从而解决了这一差距。采用混合多准则决策(MCDM)方法,结合模糊层次分析法(FAHP)对再生性能准则进行权重分配,并结合模糊理想解相似性排序偏好技术(FTOPSIS)对新开发的RSCM实践进行评价和排序。来自再生建筑专业人士的专家意见为标准的选择和评估过程提供了信息。结果表明,在设计阶段以“设计与自然”为首要目标,在采购阶段采用生物可降解材料,在运输阶段采用战略运输规划。在建造和报废阶段,最重要的实践包括模块化建造和优先拆卸和材料回收。研究结果为将再生原则嵌入建筑供应链提供了强大的数据驱动工具,并为政策和实践提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multi-level hierarchy decision-making framework for the implementation of novel regenerative supply chain management practices in construction
As environmental challenges intensify and natural resources decline, the construction industry must move beyond sustainability efforts, which often focus on minimizing harm, towards regenerative approaches that actively restore ecosystems and enhance environmental well-being. However, the lack of a structured framework to assess and implement regenerative supply chain management (RSCM) practices remains a significant barrier. This study addresses this gap by developing a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide the prioritization and adoption of regenerative strategies across the construction supply chain. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed, combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assign weights to regenerative performance criteria, and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) to evaluate and rank newly developed RSCM practices. Expert input from regenerative construction professionals informed the criteria selection and evaluation process. Results highlight “designing with nature” as the top priority in the design phase, biodegradable materials in purchasing, and strategic transport planning in the transportation stage. In construction and end-of-life stages, the top practices include modular construction and prioritizing disassembly and material recovery. The research findings provide a robust, data-driven tool for embedding regenerative principles into construction supply chains and informs both policy and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信