经皮经食管胃造口术治疗有症状性恶性肠梗阻的妇科肿瘤患者:一个病例系列

IF 1.3 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Leslie Panella , Megan Gorman , Divya Gowthaman , Gary L. Goldberg , Marina Frimer , Daniel Putterman , Jill S. Whyte
{"title":"经皮经食管胃造口术治疗有症状性恶性肠梗阻的妇科肿瘤患者:一个病例系列","authors":"Leslie Panella ,&nbsp;Megan Gorman ,&nbsp;Divya Gowthaman ,&nbsp;Gary L. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Marina Frimer ,&nbsp;Daniel Putterman ,&nbsp;Jill S. Whyte","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent complication in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tubes (PTEG) were developed as an alternative in patients when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is technically difficult or clinically contraindicated.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical cases</h3><div>Here we present three cases of women with gynecologic cancers with MBO who failed conservative or medical management and had a PTEG placed for palliative gastric decompression. No major complications were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The procedures were successfully performed under general anesthesia by Interventional Radiologists. Under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, a multipurpose drainage catheter was placed through the neck into the esophagus and positioned into the stomach. The catheter was then connected to drainage. Technical success was achieved in all the patients.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There are few palliative options for gastric decompression in patients who have advanced gynecologic malignancies. Both PEG and long-term nasogastric tube use have well-documented complications, especially in patients with large tumor burden and ascites. PTEG has been developed as a safe alternative with a low rate of complications and effective symptomatic relief in this patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101931"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy in gynecologic oncology patients with symptomatic malignant bowel obstruction: A case series\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Panella ,&nbsp;Megan Gorman ,&nbsp;Divya Gowthaman ,&nbsp;Gary L. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Marina Frimer ,&nbsp;Daniel Putterman ,&nbsp;Jill S. Whyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent complication in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tubes (PTEG) were developed as an alternative in patients when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is technically difficult or clinically contraindicated.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical cases</h3><div>Here we present three cases of women with gynecologic cancers with MBO who failed conservative or medical management and had a PTEG placed for palliative gastric decompression. No major complications were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The procedures were successfully performed under general anesthesia by Interventional Radiologists. Under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, a multipurpose drainage catheter was placed through the neck into the esophagus and positioned into the stomach. The catheter was then connected to drainage. Technical success was achieved in all the patients.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There are few palliative options for gastric decompression in patients who have advanced gynecologic malignancies. Both PEG and long-term nasogastric tube use have well-documented complications, especially in patients with large tumor burden and ascites. PTEG has been developed as a safe alternative with a low rate of complications and effective symptomatic relief in this patient population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925001560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925001560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恶性肠梗阻(MBO)是晚期妇科恶性肿瘤患者的常见并发症。经皮经食管胃造口管(PTEG)是经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)技术困难或临床禁忌的患者的替代选择。临床病例在此,我们报告了3例女性妇科肿瘤伴MBO患者,保守或药物治疗失败,并放置PTEG进行姑息性胃减压。无重大并发症。材料与方法介入放射科医师在全身麻醉下成功完成手术。在超声和透视引导下,将一根多用途引流管经颈部置入食管,置入胃内。然后将导管连接到引流管。所有患者均取得了技术上的成功。对于晚期妇科恶性肿瘤患者,胃减压的姑息性选择很少。PEG和长期鼻胃管的使用都有明确的并发症,特别是在肿瘤负荷大和腹水的患者中。PTEG已被开发为一种安全的替代方案,并发症发生率低,在该患者群体中有效缓解症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy in gynecologic oncology patients with symptomatic malignant bowel obstruction: A case series

Introduction

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent complication in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tubes (PTEG) were developed as an alternative in patients when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is technically difficult or clinically contraindicated.

Clinical cases

Here we present three cases of women with gynecologic cancers with MBO who failed conservative or medical management and had a PTEG placed for palliative gastric decompression. No major complications were noted.

Materials and methods

The procedures were successfully performed under general anesthesia by Interventional Radiologists. Under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, a multipurpose drainage catheter was placed through the neck into the esophagus and positioned into the stomach. The catheter was then connected to drainage. Technical success was achieved in all the patients.

Discussion

There are few palliative options for gastric decompression in patients who have advanced gynecologic malignancies. Both PEG and long-term nasogastric tube use have well-documented complications, especially in patients with large tumor burden and ascites. PTEG has been developed as a safe alternative with a low rate of complications and effective symptomatic relief in this patient population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信