Leslie Panella , Megan Gorman , Divya Gowthaman , Gary L. Goldberg , Marina Frimer , Daniel Putterman , Jill S. Whyte
{"title":"经皮经食管胃造口术治疗有症状性恶性肠梗阻的妇科肿瘤患者:一个病例系列","authors":"Leslie Panella , Megan Gorman , Divya Gowthaman , Gary L. Goldberg , Marina Frimer , Daniel Putterman , Jill S. Whyte","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent complication in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tubes (PTEG) were developed as an alternative in patients when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is technically difficult or clinically contraindicated.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical cases</h3><div>Here we present three cases of women with gynecologic cancers with MBO who failed conservative or medical management and had a PTEG placed for palliative gastric decompression. No major complications were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The procedures were successfully performed under general anesthesia by Interventional Radiologists. Under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, a multipurpose drainage catheter was placed through the neck into the esophagus and positioned into the stomach. The catheter was then connected to drainage. Technical success was achieved in all the patients.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There are few palliative options for gastric decompression in patients who have advanced gynecologic malignancies. Both PEG and long-term nasogastric tube use have well-documented complications, especially in patients with large tumor burden and ascites. PTEG has been developed as a safe alternative with a low rate of complications and effective symptomatic relief in this patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101931"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy in gynecologic oncology patients with symptomatic malignant bowel obstruction: A case series\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Panella , Megan Gorman , Divya Gowthaman , Gary L. Goldberg , Marina Frimer , Daniel Putterman , Jill S. Whyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent complication in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tubes (PTEG) were developed as an alternative in patients when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is technically difficult or clinically contraindicated.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical cases</h3><div>Here we present three cases of women with gynecologic cancers with MBO who failed conservative or medical management and had a PTEG placed for palliative gastric decompression. No major complications were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The procedures were successfully performed under general anesthesia by Interventional Radiologists. Under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, a multipurpose drainage catheter was placed through the neck into the esophagus and positioned into the stomach. The catheter was then connected to drainage. Technical success was achieved in all the patients.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There are few palliative options for gastric decompression in patients who have advanced gynecologic malignancies. Both PEG and long-term nasogastric tube use have well-documented complications, especially in patients with large tumor burden and ascites. PTEG has been developed as a safe alternative with a low rate of complications and effective symptomatic relief in this patient population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925001560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925001560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy in gynecologic oncology patients with symptomatic malignant bowel obstruction: A case series
Introduction
Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent complication in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tubes (PTEG) were developed as an alternative in patients when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is technically difficult or clinically contraindicated.
Clinical cases
Here we present three cases of women with gynecologic cancers with MBO who failed conservative or medical management and had a PTEG placed for palliative gastric decompression. No major complications were noted.
Materials and methods
The procedures were successfully performed under general anesthesia by Interventional Radiologists. Under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, a multipurpose drainage catheter was placed through the neck into the esophagus and positioned into the stomach. The catheter was then connected to drainage. Technical success was achieved in all the patients.
Discussion
There are few palliative options for gastric decompression in patients who have advanced gynecologic malignancies. Both PEG and long-term nasogastric tube use have well-documented complications, especially in patients with large tumor burden and ascites. PTEG has been developed as a safe alternative with a low rate of complications and effective symptomatic relief in this patient population.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.