层理角和层理结构对页岩各向异性力学破坏行为的耦合影响——基于数字岩石的数值模拟

IF 4.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Dingdian Yan, Luanxiao Zhao, Minghui Lu, Yonghao Zhang, Zhanshan Xiao, Fengshou Zhang
{"title":"层理角和层理结构对页岩各向异性力学破坏行为的耦合影响——基于数字岩石的数值模拟","authors":"Dingdian Yan,&nbsp;Luanxiao Zhao,&nbsp;Minghui Lu,&nbsp;Yonghao Zhang,&nbsp;Zhanshan Xiao,&nbsp;Fengshou Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2025JB031436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bedding angle and structural characteristics are fundamental attributes of laminated shales, and their interplay inherently governs anisotropic mechanical behavior. A deep understanding of these governing mechanisms is crucial for advancing geo-engineering evaluations across various fields of Earth and Energy Sciences. However, shale's intrinsic heterogeneities complicate experimental research and hinder the unraveling of the underlying physical mechanisms. We integrated geological data into a discrete element model to construct anisotropic digital shales, enabling a combined analysis of the coupled effects of bedding angle and structures on mechanical responses under compressive loading. Results show that Young's modulus increases with bedding angle, while compressive strength displays a V-shaped trend, and Poisson's ratio shows the opposite pattern. Critical bedding angles for minimum strength and maximum Poisson's ratio vary across bedding structures-45<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for finely laminated, 60<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for laminated, and 30<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for massive shales. This finding may help explain the variability of critical angles observed in previous experiments. Strength and modulus anisotropy also differ among shale types: finely laminated shale has the lowest strength but highest modulus anisotropy, while massive shale exhibits the opposite trend. Micro-damage analysis shows that at small bedding angles, axial deformation dominates, while interlayer slip is limited. Increasing bedding angles induces stress concentration along bedding planes, enhancing shear slip and reducing axial strain, resulting in failure concentrated at bedding interfaces. Across varying bedding structures, bedding-plane shear slip reaches the maximum at its critical angle, promoting intensive crack development along bedding planes. Strength variation reflects the internal stress transmission heterogeneities governed by bedding features.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupled Effects of Bedding Angle and Bedding Structure on the Anisotropic Mechanical and Failure Behaviors of Shales: Numerical Simulations on Digital Rocks\",\"authors\":\"Dingdian Yan,&nbsp;Luanxiao Zhao,&nbsp;Minghui Lu,&nbsp;Yonghao Zhang,&nbsp;Zhanshan Xiao,&nbsp;Fengshou Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JB031436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bedding angle and structural characteristics are fundamental attributes of laminated shales, and their interplay inherently governs anisotropic mechanical behavior. A deep understanding of these governing mechanisms is crucial for advancing geo-engineering evaluations across various fields of Earth and Energy Sciences. However, shale's intrinsic heterogeneities complicate experimental research and hinder the unraveling of the underlying physical mechanisms. We integrated geological data into a discrete element model to construct anisotropic digital shales, enabling a combined analysis of the coupled effects of bedding angle and structures on mechanical responses under compressive loading. Results show that Young's modulus increases with bedding angle, while compressive strength displays a V-shaped trend, and Poisson's ratio shows the opposite pattern. Critical bedding angles for minimum strength and maximum Poisson's ratio vary across bedding structures-45<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for finely laminated, 60<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for laminated, and 30<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for massive shales. This finding may help explain the variability of critical angles observed in previous experiments. Strength and modulus anisotropy also differ among shale types: finely laminated shale has the lowest strength but highest modulus anisotropy, while massive shale exhibits the opposite trend. Micro-damage analysis shows that at small bedding angles, axial deformation dominates, while interlayer slip is limited. Increasing bedding angles induces stress concentration along bedding planes, enhancing shear slip and reducing axial strain, resulting in failure concentrated at bedding interfaces. Across varying bedding structures, bedding-plane shear slip reaches the maximum at its critical angle, promoting intensive crack development along bedding planes. Strength variation reflects the internal stress transmission heterogeneities governed by bedding features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"130 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JB031436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JB031436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

层理角度和构造特征是层状页岩的基本属性,它们的相互作用内在地支配着层状页岩的各向异性力学行为。对这些控制机制的深刻理解对于推进地球与能源科学各个领域的地球工程评估至关重要。然而,页岩固有的非均质性使实验研究复杂化,并阻碍了对潜在物理机制的揭示。我们将地质数据整合到离散元模型中,构建各向异性数字页岩,从而能够综合分析层理角度和构造对压缩载荷下力学响应的耦合效应。结果表明:杨氏模量随层理角度增大而增大,抗压强度呈v型趋势,泊松比呈相反趋势;最小强度和最大泊松比的临界层理角度因层理结构的不同而不同:细层状为45°$\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$,层状为60°$\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$,30°$\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$适用于大块页岩。这一发现可能有助于解释以前实验中观察到的临界角度的可变性。不同类型页岩的强度和模量各向异性也不同,细层状页岩强度最低,模量各向异性最高,块状页岩则相反。微损伤分析表明,在层理角度较小时,轴向变形占主导地位,层间滑移受限制。随着层理角度的增大,应力沿层理面集中,剪切滑移加剧,轴向应变减小,破坏集中在层理界面处。在不同层理构造中,层理面剪切滑移在其临界角处达到最大,促使裂缝沿层理面密集发育。强度变化反映了受层理特征支配的内应力传递非均质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Coupled Effects of Bedding Angle and Bedding Structure on the Anisotropic Mechanical and Failure Behaviors of Shales: Numerical Simulations on Digital Rocks

Coupled Effects of Bedding Angle and Bedding Structure on the Anisotropic Mechanical and Failure Behaviors of Shales: Numerical Simulations on Digital Rocks

Coupled Effects of Bedding Angle and Bedding Structure on the Anisotropic Mechanical and Failure Behaviors of Shales: Numerical Simulations on Digital Rocks

Bedding angle and structural characteristics are fundamental attributes of laminated shales, and their interplay inherently governs anisotropic mechanical behavior. A deep understanding of these governing mechanisms is crucial for advancing geo-engineering evaluations across various fields of Earth and Energy Sciences. However, shale's intrinsic heterogeneities complicate experimental research and hinder the unraveling of the underlying physical mechanisms. We integrated geological data into a discrete element model to construct anisotropic digital shales, enabling a combined analysis of the coupled effects of bedding angle and structures on mechanical responses under compressive loading. Results show that Young's modulus increases with bedding angle, while compressive strength displays a V-shaped trend, and Poisson's ratio shows the opposite pattern. Critical bedding angles for minimum strength and maximum Poisson's ratio vary across bedding structures-45 ° $\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ for finely laminated, 60 ° $\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ for laminated, and 30 ° $\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ for massive shales. This finding may help explain the variability of critical angles observed in previous experiments. Strength and modulus anisotropy also differ among shale types: finely laminated shale has the lowest strength but highest modulus anisotropy, while massive shale exhibits the opposite trend. Micro-damage analysis shows that at small bedding angles, axial deformation dominates, while interlayer slip is limited. Increasing bedding angles induces stress concentration along bedding planes, enhancing shear slip and reducing axial strain, resulting in failure concentrated at bedding interfaces. Across varying bedding structures, bedding-plane shear slip reaches the maximum at its critical angle, promoting intensive crack development along bedding planes. Strength variation reflects the internal stress transmission heterogeneities governed by bedding features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信