超声心动图测量下腔静脉直径估算成人方坦患者中心静脉压。

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2025-07-21 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf089
Makoto Miyake, Hiraku Doi, Yu Noguchi, Kyokun Uehara, Toshihiro Tamura
{"title":"超声心动图测量下腔静脉直径估算成人方坦患者中心静脉压。","authors":"Makoto Miyake, Hiraku Doi, Yu Noguchi, Kyokun Uehara, Toshihiro Tamura","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In adult Fontan patients, a higher central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Assessing CVP is helpful to guide therapeutic strategies; however, it remains unclear whether CVP can be accurately estimated from the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter by echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study enrolled 21 adult Fontan patients (median age: 21.5 years, 52% male) who had a transthoracic echocardiogram performed after admission for a scheduled cardiac catheterization. The relationship between CVP estimated by echocardiography and CVP measured by catheterization was investigated. According to echocardiographic guidelines, CVP was estimated to be 3, 8, or 15 mmHg on the basis of the IVC diameter and its respiratory collapse. To evaluate the agreement between estimated and measured CVP grades, measured CVP was also classified into three grades. The mean IVC diameter and measured CVP were 1.41 ± 0.27 cm and 11.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. Both the IVC diameter and the estimated CVP grade were correlated with measured CVP (<i>r</i> = 0.526, <i>P</i> = 0.014 and rho = 0.573, <i>P</i> = 0.007, respectively). However, the estimated CVP grade was concordant with the measured CVP grade in only two patients. In the remaining 19 patients (90%), the estimated CVP grade was lower than the measured CVP grade. Only slight agreement was observed between these two gradings of CVP [weighted kappa coefficient: 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00-0.25].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adult Fontan patients, the echocardiographic classification of CVP grading using the IVC diameter may underestimate CVP, suggesting that this echocardiographic method cannot replace invasive methods in accurately assessing CVP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"3 3","pages":"qyaf089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Echocardiographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter for estimating central venous pressure in adult Fontan patients.\",\"authors\":\"Makoto Miyake, Hiraku Doi, Yu Noguchi, Kyokun Uehara, Toshihiro Tamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In adult Fontan patients, a higher central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Assessing CVP is helpful to guide therapeutic strategies; however, it remains unclear whether CVP can be accurately estimated from the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter by echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study enrolled 21 adult Fontan patients (median age: 21.5 years, 52% male) who had a transthoracic echocardiogram performed after admission for a scheduled cardiac catheterization. The relationship between CVP estimated by echocardiography and CVP measured by catheterization was investigated. According to echocardiographic guidelines, CVP was estimated to be 3, 8, or 15 mmHg on the basis of the IVC diameter and its respiratory collapse. To evaluate the agreement between estimated and measured CVP grades, measured CVP was also classified into three grades. The mean IVC diameter and measured CVP were 1.41 ± 0.27 cm and 11.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. Both the IVC diameter and the estimated CVP grade were correlated with measured CVP (<i>r</i> = 0.526, <i>P</i> = 0.014 and rho = 0.573, <i>P</i> = 0.007, respectively). However, the estimated CVP grade was concordant with the measured CVP grade in only two patients. In the remaining 19 patients (90%), the estimated CVP grade was lower than the measured CVP grade. Only slight agreement was observed between these two gradings of CVP [weighted kappa coefficient: 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00-0.25].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adult Fontan patients, the echocardiographic classification of CVP grading using the IVC diameter may underestimate CVP, suggesting that this echocardiographic method cannot replace invasive methods in accurately assessing CVP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"qyaf089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在成人Fontan患者中,较高的中心静脉压(CVP)与较差的临床结果相关。评估CVP有助于指导治疗策略;然而,超声心动图能否准确估计下腔静脉(IVC)直径的CVP仍不清楚。方法和结果:这项单中心、回顾性研究纳入了21例成年Fontan患者(中位年龄:21.5岁,52%为男性),这些患者在入院接受心导管插入术后进行了经胸超声心动图检查。探讨超声心动图测得的CVP与导管测得的CVP之间的关系。根据超声心动图指南,根据下腔静脉直径及其呼吸衰竭,CVP估计为3、8或15 mmHg。为了评估估算和测量的CVP等级之间的一致性,测量的CVP也被分为三个等级。平均下腔静脉直径为1.41±0.27 cm, CVP为11.9±2.8 mmHg。IVC直径和估计的CVP等级与测量的CVP均相关(r = 0.526, P = 0.014, rho = 0.573, P = 0.007)。然而,只有两名患者的估计CVP等级与测量CVP等级一致。在其余19例患者(90%)中,估计的CVP等级低于测量的CVP等级。这两种CVP分级之间只有轻微的一致性[加权卡帕系数:0.13,95%可信区间(CI): 0.00-0.25]。结论:在成人Fontan患者中,超声心动图根据下腔静脉直径进行CVP分级可能会低估CVP,提示超声心动图方法不能代替有创方法准确评估CVP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Echocardiographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter for estimating central venous pressure in adult Fontan patients.

Echocardiographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter for estimating central venous pressure in adult Fontan patients.

Echocardiographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter for estimating central venous pressure in adult Fontan patients.

Echocardiographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter for estimating central venous pressure in adult Fontan patients.

Aims: In adult Fontan patients, a higher central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Assessing CVP is helpful to guide therapeutic strategies; however, it remains unclear whether CVP can be accurately estimated from the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter by echocardiography.

Methods and results: This single-centre, retrospective study enrolled 21 adult Fontan patients (median age: 21.5 years, 52% male) who had a transthoracic echocardiogram performed after admission for a scheduled cardiac catheterization. The relationship between CVP estimated by echocardiography and CVP measured by catheterization was investigated. According to echocardiographic guidelines, CVP was estimated to be 3, 8, or 15 mmHg on the basis of the IVC diameter and its respiratory collapse. To evaluate the agreement between estimated and measured CVP grades, measured CVP was also classified into three grades. The mean IVC diameter and measured CVP were 1.41 ± 0.27 cm and 11.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. Both the IVC diameter and the estimated CVP grade were correlated with measured CVP (r = 0.526, P = 0.014 and rho = 0.573, P = 0.007, respectively). However, the estimated CVP grade was concordant with the measured CVP grade in only two patients. In the remaining 19 patients (90%), the estimated CVP grade was lower than the measured CVP grade. Only slight agreement was observed between these two gradings of CVP [weighted kappa coefficient: 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00-0.25].

Conclusion: In adult Fontan patients, the echocardiographic classification of CVP grading using the IVC diameter may underestimate CVP, suggesting that this echocardiographic method cannot replace invasive methods in accurately assessing CVP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信