{"title":"基于粪便的甲基化syndecan-2检测在平均/高危人群中具有很高的阳性预测价值:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Xinxin Huang, Song Zhang, Yanmei Liu, Xiangyu Sui, Peng Pan, Youdong Zhao, Qiwen Fang, Yongjiang Cai, Yuesheng Gong, Wang Li, Haibo Lan, Yunting Deng, Yijin Xu, Zhen Cai, Huiting Chen, Shaoyu Huang, Qianchi Zhou, Zhanmei Huang, Bo Feng, Yinhui Li, Weiguo Yin, Zhaoshen Li, Xiaosheng He, Shengbing Zhao, Yu Bai","doi":"10.1093/gastro/goaf077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stool DNA testing based on methylated syndecan-2 (mSDC2) is a potential novel non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess its positive predictive value (PPV) in real-world practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively recruited consecutive patients with positive stool DNA-based SDC2 methylation tests from 18 hospitals between November 2016 and July 2021. Included patients were classified into the average-risk equivalent or increased-risk population and the previous-negative-colonoscopy or no-previous-colonoscopy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to investigate the risk factors that affect the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in patients with a positive mSDC2 test. The primary outcome was the PPV for ACN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall PPVs for ACN, CRC, and colorectal neoplasia were 28.5%, 12.8%, and 44.6%, respectively. The PPV for ACN was higher in the no-previous-colonoscopy group than in the previous-negative-colonoscopy group (30.1% vs 18.5%, <i>P </i>= 0.008) and higher in the increased-risk population than in the average-risk equivalent population (41.1% vs 21.6%, <i>P </i>< 0.001). However, the PPV (18.5%) was still high for patients with a previous negative colonoscopy. For ACN detection in patients with a positive mSDC2 test, old age, increased risk, and smoking history were identified as independent risk factors; previous negative colonoscopy was identified as a protective factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mSDC2 test, which has a high PPV for both ACN and CRC, is expected to be an alternative CRC screening strategy. Patients with a positive mSDC2 test might require a colonoscopy as soon as possible, even if the previous colonoscopy was negative.</p>","PeriodicalId":54275,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Report","volume":"13 ","pages":"goaf077"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stool-based methylated syndecan-2 testing has a high positive predictive value in an average/increased-risk population: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Xinxin Huang, Song Zhang, Yanmei Liu, Xiangyu Sui, Peng Pan, Youdong Zhao, Qiwen Fang, Yongjiang Cai, Yuesheng Gong, Wang Li, Haibo Lan, Yunting Deng, Yijin Xu, Zhen Cai, Huiting Chen, Shaoyu Huang, Qianchi Zhou, Zhanmei Huang, Bo Feng, Yinhui Li, Weiguo Yin, Zhaoshen Li, Xiaosheng He, Shengbing Zhao, Yu Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gastro/goaf077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stool DNA testing based on methylated syndecan-2 (mSDC2) is a potential novel non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess its positive predictive value (PPV) in real-world practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively recruited consecutive patients with positive stool DNA-based SDC2 methylation tests from 18 hospitals between November 2016 and July 2021. Included patients were classified into the average-risk equivalent or increased-risk population and the previous-negative-colonoscopy or no-previous-colonoscopy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to investigate the risk factors that affect the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in patients with a positive mSDC2 test. The primary outcome was the PPV for ACN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall PPVs for ACN, CRC, and colorectal neoplasia were 28.5%, 12.8%, and 44.6%, respectively. The PPV for ACN was higher in the no-previous-colonoscopy group than in the previous-negative-colonoscopy group (30.1% vs 18.5%, <i>P </i>= 0.008) and higher in the increased-risk population than in the average-risk equivalent population (41.1% vs 21.6%, <i>P </i>< 0.001). However, the PPV (18.5%) was still high for patients with a previous negative colonoscopy. For ACN detection in patients with a positive mSDC2 test, old age, increased risk, and smoking history were identified as independent risk factors; previous negative colonoscopy was identified as a protective factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mSDC2 test, which has a high PPV for both ACN and CRC, is expected to be an alternative CRC screening strategy. Patients with a positive mSDC2 test might require a colonoscopy as soon as possible, even if the previous colonoscopy was negative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"goaf077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaf077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Report","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaf077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stool-based methylated syndecan-2 testing has a high positive predictive value in an average/increased-risk population: a multicenter retrospective study.
Introduction: Stool DNA testing based on methylated syndecan-2 (mSDC2) is a potential novel non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess its positive predictive value (PPV) in real-world practice.
Methods: This study retrospectively recruited consecutive patients with positive stool DNA-based SDC2 methylation tests from 18 hospitals between November 2016 and July 2021. Included patients were classified into the average-risk equivalent or increased-risk population and the previous-negative-colonoscopy or no-previous-colonoscopy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to investigate the risk factors that affect the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in patients with a positive mSDC2 test. The primary outcome was the PPV for ACN.
Results: The overall PPVs for ACN, CRC, and colorectal neoplasia were 28.5%, 12.8%, and 44.6%, respectively. The PPV for ACN was higher in the no-previous-colonoscopy group than in the previous-negative-colonoscopy group (30.1% vs 18.5%, P = 0.008) and higher in the increased-risk population than in the average-risk equivalent population (41.1% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001). However, the PPV (18.5%) was still high for patients with a previous negative colonoscopy. For ACN detection in patients with a positive mSDC2 test, old age, increased risk, and smoking history were identified as independent risk factors; previous negative colonoscopy was identified as a protective factor.
Conclusions: The mSDC2 test, which has a high PPV for both ACN and CRC, is expected to be an alternative CRC screening strategy. Patients with a positive mSDC2 test might require a colonoscopy as soon as possible, even if the previous colonoscopy was negative.
期刊介绍:
Gastroenterology Report is an international fully open access (OA) online only journal, covering all areas related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of topical issues.