在初级保健实践中,居民希望从临床监督中得到什么?确定门诊病人的期望行为。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Allen F Shaughnessy, Omar Wahid, Judy Fleishman, Randi Sokol
{"title":"在初级保健实践中,居民希望从临床监督中得到什么?确定门诊病人的期望行为。","authors":"Allen F Shaughnessy, Omar Wahid, Judy Fleishman, Randi Sokol","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.122314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Feedback to clinical supervisors of residents (preceptors) is critical to ensure quality teaching. Most feedback tools are based on theoretical models or expert opinion. No research has asked residents their thoughts on teaching practices. Our objective was to identify desired precepting practices by analyzing written feedback provided to preceptors by residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project was conducted in a family medicine residency training program, analyzing feedback to preceptors from residents collected over 5 years. We used the nonviolent communication format, which identifies a request to a preceptor to continue an existing teaching behavior or change to a new one. The request statements were qualitatively analyzed by coders, aligning them when possible to categories of the Mayo Outpatient Precepting Evaluation Tool. Using content analysis, we coalesced all codes into categories from which we derived behaviorally based desired practices for precepting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (66.49%) of the requests were to continue a teaching behavior. We identified 26 desired practices in the following categories: setting the learning climate (n=5); preprecepting (n=2); preceptor presence (n=1); conveying clinical knowledge (n=4); decision-making (n=5); time management (n=4); and feedback on performance (n=5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified precepting practices that residents desire. Some of these desired behaviors are not reflected in existing preceptor evaluation tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Do Residents Want From Clinical Supervision in Primary Care Practice? Identifying Desired Behaviors for Outpatient Precepting.\",\"authors\":\"Allen F Shaughnessy, Omar Wahid, Judy Fleishman, Randi Sokol\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/FamMed.2025.122314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Feedback to clinical supervisors of residents (preceptors) is critical to ensure quality teaching. Most feedback tools are based on theoretical models or expert opinion. No research has asked residents their thoughts on teaching practices. Our objective was to identify desired precepting practices by analyzing written feedback provided to preceptors by residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project was conducted in a family medicine residency training program, analyzing feedback to preceptors from residents collected over 5 years. We used the nonviolent communication format, which identifies a request to a preceptor to continue an existing teaching behavior or change to a new one. The request statements were qualitatively analyzed by coders, aligning them when possible to categories of the Mayo Outpatient Precepting Evaluation Tool. Using content analysis, we coalesced all codes into categories from which we derived behaviorally based desired practices for precepting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (66.49%) of the requests were to continue a teaching behavior. We identified 26 desired practices in the following categories: setting the learning climate (n=5); preprecepting (n=2); preceptor presence (n=1); conveying clinical knowledge (n=4); decision-making (n=5); time management (n=4); and feedback on performance (n=5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified precepting practices that residents desire. Some of these desired behaviors are not reflected in existing preceptor evaluation tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.122314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.122314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:向住院医师临床督导(指导员)反馈是保证教学质量的关键。大多数反馈工具都是基于理论模型或专家意见。没有研究询问过住院医生对教学实践的看法。我们的目标是通过分析居民提供给指导员的书面反馈来确定理想的指导员实践。方法:本研究在家庭医学住院医师培训项目中进行,分析5年来住院医师对导师的反馈。我们使用了非暴力的沟通形式,即向导师提出继续现有教学行为或改变新的教学行为的请求。编码人员对请求陈述进行定性分析,尽可能将其与梅奥门诊诊疗评估工具的类别相一致。使用内容分析,我们将所有代码合并到类别中,从中我们得出基于行为的期望实践。结果:要求继续某项教学行为的占66.49%。我们在以下类别中确定了26个理想的实践:设置学习氛围(n=5);preprecepting (n = 2);训导存在(n=1);传授临床知识(n=4);决策(n = 5);时间管理(n=4);以及业绩反馈(n=5)。结论:我们确定了居民希望接受的做法。其中一些期望的行为在现有的训导评估工具中没有反映出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Do Residents Want From Clinical Supervision in Primary Care Practice? Identifying Desired Behaviors for Outpatient Precepting.

Background and objectives: Feedback to clinical supervisors of residents (preceptors) is critical to ensure quality teaching. Most feedback tools are based on theoretical models or expert opinion. No research has asked residents their thoughts on teaching practices. Our objective was to identify desired precepting practices by analyzing written feedback provided to preceptors by residents.

Methods: This project was conducted in a family medicine residency training program, analyzing feedback to preceptors from residents collected over 5 years. We used the nonviolent communication format, which identifies a request to a preceptor to continue an existing teaching behavior or change to a new one. The request statements were qualitatively analyzed by coders, aligning them when possible to categories of the Mayo Outpatient Precepting Evaluation Tool. Using content analysis, we coalesced all codes into categories from which we derived behaviorally based desired practices for precepting.

Results: Most (66.49%) of the requests were to continue a teaching behavior. We identified 26 desired practices in the following categories: setting the learning climate (n=5); preprecepting (n=2); preceptor presence (n=1); conveying clinical knowledge (n=4); decision-making (n=5); time management (n=4); and feedback on performance (n=5).

Conclusions: We identified precepting practices that residents desire. Some of these desired behaviors are not reflected in existing preceptor evaluation tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信