在动作抑制过程中停止肌肉收缩和松弛涉及依赖于肌肉状态的全局和靶向控制。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jack De Havas, Jaime Ibañez, Hiroaki Gomi, Sven Bestmann
{"title":"在动作抑制过程中停止肌肉收缩和松弛涉及依赖于肌肉状态的全局和靶向控制。","authors":"Jack De Havas, Jaime Ibañez, Hiroaki Gomi, Sven Bestmann","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1170-25.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanisms underpinning the stopping of muscle contractions and relaxations during action inhibition remain unclear. Central stop commands may be targeted and act on task-active muscles only, or instead be global, acting on task-passive muscles as well. We addressed this question in three stop signal task experiments with human participants (<i>n</i> = 54; 18 male, 36 female). While maintaining baseline force levels (10% MVC) in both index fingers, Go signals required participants to increase or decrease this force in the task-active finger (Task-active Contract vs Task-active Relax) while keeping activity in the task-passive muscle constant. On 30% of trials, delayed stop signals instructed participants to stop the task-active responses. Stop-related activity was detected in task-active muscles at the single trial level, using electromyography (EMG), and used to determine whether stop-related activity was also present in task-passive muscles. We found that stop commands act on both task-active and task-passive muscles, suggesting global control. This global control was furthermore muscle state specific, by decreasing muscle activity when stopping contractions and increasing muscle activity when stopping relaxations. However, stopping muscle contractions involved more sustained suppression of muscle activity in task-active than task-passive muscles, suggesting additional targeted control. This was not the case when stopping muscle relaxations, which only showed evidence of global control. Our results may explain how complex, real-world actions are inhibited. Global stop commands that are sensitive to muscle state may rapidly adjust muscle activity across the body, with additional control targeted to contracting, task-active muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stopping Muscle Contractions and Relaxations during Action Inhibition Involves Global and Targeted Control Dependent on Muscle State.\",\"authors\":\"Jack De Havas, Jaime Ibañez, Hiroaki Gomi, Sven Bestmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1170-25.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The mechanisms underpinning the stopping of muscle contractions and relaxations during action inhibition remain unclear. Central stop commands may be targeted and act on task-active muscles only, or instead be global, acting on task-passive muscles as well. We addressed this question in three stop signal task experiments with human participants (<i>n</i> = 54; 18 male, 36 female). While maintaining baseline force levels (10% MVC) in both index fingers, Go signals required participants to increase or decrease this force in the task-active finger (Task-active Contract vs Task-active Relax) while keeping activity in the task-passive muscle constant. On 30% of trials, delayed stop signals instructed participants to stop the task-active responses. Stop-related activity was detected in task-active muscles at the single trial level, using electromyography (EMG), and used to determine whether stop-related activity was also present in task-passive muscles. We found that stop commands act on both task-active and task-passive muscles, suggesting global control. This global control was furthermore muscle state specific, by decreasing muscle activity when stopping contractions and increasing muscle activity when stopping relaxations. However, stopping muscle contractions involved more sustained suppression of muscle activity in task-active than task-passive muscles, suggesting additional targeted control. This was not the case when stopping muscle relaxations, which only showed evidence of global control. Our results may explain how complex, real-world actions are inhibited. Global stop commands that are sensitive to muscle state may rapidly adjust muscle activity across the body, with additional control targeted to contracting, task-active muscles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491765/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1170-25.2025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1170-25.2025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在动作抑制过程中肌肉收缩和松弛停止的机制尚不清楚。中央停止命令可能只针对并作用于任务主动肌肉,也可能是全局的,作用于任务被动肌肉。我们在三个人类参与者的停止信号任务实验中解决了这个问题(n=54; 18名男性,36名女性)。在保持两个食指的基线力水平(10% MVC)的同时,Go信号要求参与者增加或减少任务主动手指的力(任务主动收缩vs任务主动放松),同时保持任务被动肌肉的活动不变。在30%的试验中,延迟的停止信号指示参与者停止任务主动反应。在单次试验水平上,使用肌电图(EMG)在任务活跃肌肉中检测到与停止相关的活动,并用于确定任务被动肌肉中是否也存在与停止相关的活动。我们发现,停止指令同时作用于任务主动肌和任务被动肌,表明了全局控制。这种全局控制进一步是肌肉状态特异性的,当停止收缩时肌肉活动减少,当停止放松时肌肉活动增加。然而,与任务被动肌肉相比,停止肌肉收缩对任务主动肌肉活动的抑制更持久,这表明有额外的目标控制。当停止肌肉放松时,情况并非如此,因为肌肉放松只显示出整体控制的证据。我们的研究结果或许可以解释现实世界中复杂的行为是如何被抑制的。对肌肉状态敏感的全局停止命令可以快速调整全身肌肉活动,并对收缩的、任务活跃的肌肉进行额外的控制。在动作抑制期间发送给肌肉的停止命令的性质尚不清楚。我们发现,动作抑制改变了任务被动肌和任务主动肌的活动,这表明停止指令本质上是全球性的。全局停止命令是针对肌肉状态的;当停止收缩肌肉时,他们的活动减少,而当停止放松肌肉时,他们的活动增加。额外的目标指令被发送到任务主动肌肉(即比任务被动肌肉更持久的抑制)的证据只在停止肌肉收缩时被发现,而不是在停止肌肉松弛时被发现。因此,行动抑制可能是由全局停止命令来支持的,该命令根据肌肉是收缩还是放松来减少或增加运动输出,并发送额外的目标命令来抑制收缩的、任务活跃的肌肉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stopping Muscle Contractions and Relaxations during Action Inhibition Involves Global and Targeted Control Dependent on Muscle State.

The mechanisms underpinning the stopping of muscle contractions and relaxations during action inhibition remain unclear. Central stop commands may be targeted and act on task-active muscles only, or instead be global, acting on task-passive muscles as well. We addressed this question in three stop signal task experiments with human participants (n = 54; 18 male, 36 female). While maintaining baseline force levels (10% MVC) in both index fingers, Go signals required participants to increase or decrease this force in the task-active finger (Task-active Contract vs Task-active Relax) while keeping activity in the task-passive muscle constant. On 30% of trials, delayed stop signals instructed participants to stop the task-active responses. Stop-related activity was detected in task-active muscles at the single trial level, using electromyography (EMG), and used to determine whether stop-related activity was also present in task-passive muscles. We found that stop commands act on both task-active and task-passive muscles, suggesting global control. This global control was furthermore muscle state specific, by decreasing muscle activity when stopping contractions and increasing muscle activity when stopping relaxations. However, stopping muscle contractions involved more sustained suppression of muscle activity in task-active than task-passive muscles, suggesting additional targeted control. This was not the case when stopping muscle relaxations, which only showed evidence of global control. Our results may explain how complex, real-world actions are inhibited. Global stop commands that are sensitive to muscle state may rapidly adjust muscle activity across the body, with additional control targeted to contracting, task-active muscles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信