精神卫生系统研究中的概念证明研究:策略和步骤。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Luis Salvador-Carulla, Hossein Tabatabaei-Jafari, Cindy Woods, Sue Lukersmith
{"title":"精神卫生系统研究中的概念证明研究:策略和步骤。","authors":"Luis Salvador-Carulla, Hossein Tabatabaei-Jafari, Cindy Woods, Sue Lukersmith","doi":"10.1186/s13033-025-00682-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of interventions, digital tools, and policy plans in health systems research is highly complex. Proof-of-Concept (PoC) studies facilitate the development of these applications although they are rarely conducted or reported in mental health research. This paper describes the principles and processes to conduct PoC studies in mental health systems research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Technology Readiness Level in Implementation Sciences (TRL-IS) serves as the reference framework for this study. A 'lessons learned' process was applied to refine the concepts and develop a research strategy based on previous experiences with PoC studies. This process incorporated insights gained from a scoping review, case studies and discussion with both a core group and an extended group of experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PoC studies assess the workability of an application, formulating the basic concept and determining whether its functionality can be transformed into a real prototype to be tested as intended via a pilot study and later demonstrated in the real world. The strategy to conduct PoC studies should be part of the analysis of readiness of any application in health system's research. The first four levels of readiness in the TRL-IS scale include (1) foundational knowledge, (2) formalised prior knowledge base, (3) completion of a workable PoC, and (4) prototyping. It's design requires input from experts in all four levels. Twenty-three main elements relevant to PoC have been identified in these four phases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PoC is generally omitted (or not reported) in mental health systems research. Researchers should be actively encouraged to overcome this omission. A common language, classification and vocabulary is needed for implementation science which incorporate this domain. The description of the specific activities conducive to PoC and prototyping should be provided. Training on the use of the TRL-IS framework including expert knowledge should also be promoted in mental health system research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proof of concept studies in mental health systems research: strategy and steps.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Salvador-Carulla, Hossein Tabatabaei-Jafari, Cindy Woods, Sue Lukersmith\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13033-025-00682-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of interventions, digital tools, and policy plans in health systems research is highly complex. Proof-of-Concept (PoC) studies facilitate the development of these applications although they are rarely conducted or reported in mental health research. This paper describes the principles and processes to conduct PoC studies in mental health systems research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Technology Readiness Level in Implementation Sciences (TRL-IS) serves as the reference framework for this study. A 'lessons learned' process was applied to refine the concepts and develop a research strategy based on previous experiences with PoC studies. This process incorporated insights gained from a scoping review, case studies and discussion with both a core group and an extended group of experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PoC studies assess the workability of an application, formulating the basic concept and determining whether its functionality can be transformed into a real prototype to be tested as intended via a pilot study and later demonstrated in the real world. The strategy to conduct PoC studies should be part of the analysis of readiness of any application in health system's research. The first four levels of readiness in the TRL-IS scale include (1) foundational knowledge, (2) formalised prior knowledge base, (3) completion of a workable PoC, and (4) prototyping. It's design requires input from experts in all four levels. Twenty-three main elements relevant to PoC have been identified in these four phases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PoC is generally omitted (or not reported) in mental health systems research. Researchers should be actively encouraged to overcome this omission. A common language, classification and vocabulary is needed for implementation science which incorporate this domain. The description of the specific activities conducive to PoC and prototyping should be provided. Training on the use of the TRL-IS framework including expert knowledge should also be promoted in mental health system research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-025-00682-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-025-00682-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在卫生系统研究中实施干预措施、数字工具和政策计划是非常复杂的。概念验证(PoC)研究促进了这些应用的发展,尽管它们很少在心理健康研究中进行或报告。本文描述了在精神卫生系统研究中进行PoC研究的原则和过程。方法:以实施科学中的技术准备水平(TRL-IS)作为本研究的参考框架。一个“经验教训”的过程被应用于完善概念,并根据先前的PoC研究经验制定研究策略。这一过程结合了从范围审查、案例研究以及与核心小组和扩展专家组的讨论中获得的见解。结果:PoC研究评估应用程序的可操作性,制定基本概念,并确定其功能是否可以转化为真实的原型,通过试点研究进行测试,然后在现实世界中进行演示。开展PoC研究的战略应成为卫生系统研究中任何应用准备情况分析的一部分。TRL-IS量表的前四个准备阶段包括(1)基础知识,(2)形式化的先验知识库,(3)完成可行的PoC,以及(4)原型设计。它的设计需要来自所有四个层面的专家的输入。在这四个阶段中已经确定了与业务协调有关的23个主要因素。讨论:在精神卫生系统研究中,PoC通常被忽略(或未报告)。应该积极鼓励研究人员克服这一疏漏。包含该领域的实现科学需要一种通用的语言、分类和词汇。应该提供有利于PoC和原型设计的具体活动的描述。还应在精神卫生系统研究中促进关于使用TRL-IS框架的培训,包括专家知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Proof of concept studies in mental health systems research: strategy and steps.

Proof of concept studies in mental health systems research: strategy and steps.

Proof of concept studies in mental health systems research: strategy and steps.

Proof of concept studies in mental health systems research: strategy and steps.

Background: The implementation of interventions, digital tools, and policy plans in health systems research is highly complex. Proof-of-Concept (PoC) studies facilitate the development of these applications although they are rarely conducted or reported in mental health research. This paper describes the principles and processes to conduct PoC studies in mental health systems research.

Method: The Technology Readiness Level in Implementation Sciences (TRL-IS) serves as the reference framework for this study. A 'lessons learned' process was applied to refine the concepts and develop a research strategy based on previous experiences with PoC studies. This process incorporated insights gained from a scoping review, case studies and discussion with both a core group and an extended group of experts.

Results: PoC studies assess the workability of an application, formulating the basic concept and determining whether its functionality can be transformed into a real prototype to be tested as intended via a pilot study and later demonstrated in the real world. The strategy to conduct PoC studies should be part of the analysis of readiness of any application in health system's research. The first four levels of readiness in the TRL-IS scale include (1) foundational knowledge, (2) formalised prior knowledge base, (3) completion of a workable PoC, and (4) prototyping. It's design requires input from experts in all four levels. Twenty-three main elements relevant to PoC have been identified in these four phases.

Discussion: PoC is generally omitted (or not reported) in mental health systems research. Researchers should be actively encouraged to overcome this omission. A common language, classification and vocabulary is needed for implementation science which incorporate this domain. The description of the specific activities conducive to PoC and prototyping should be provided. Training on the use of the TRL-IS framework including expert knowledge should also be promoted in mental health system research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信