Maya L Hunt, Jeanette W Chung, Yue-Yung Hu, Karl Y Bilimoria, Amy L Holmstrom
{"title":"2017年ACGME美国住院医师值班时间政策变化与医院质量和患者体验协会。","authors":"Maya L Hunt, Jeanette W Chung, Yue-Yung Hu, Karl Y Bilimoria, Amy L Holmstrom","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00960.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> In 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) updated select US residency duty hour requirements to improve continuity of care and resident education. It is unknown if this policy change affected hospital quality of care and patient experience. <b>Objective</b> To evaluate the association of the 2017 duty hour policy change with hospital quality and patient experience in teaching vs nonteaching hospitals. <b>Methods</b> In this observational difference-in-differences (DiD) study, hospital quality (patient outcomes) and patient experience metrics were obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services <i>Care Compare</i> data from before (July 1, 2014-June 30, 2016) and after (July 1, 2017-June 30, 2019) the 2017 policy change in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Primary outcomes include hospital quality (five 30-day readmission indicator rates, five 30-day mortality rates, 8 patient safety indicators), and patient experience (5 measures from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey). <b>Results</b> A total of 2935 hospitals (250 teaching; 2685 nonteaching) were included. When comparing before and after the 2017 policy change, teaching hospitals had greater reductions in hospital-wide readmission (DiD coefficient -0.26; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.18; <i>P</i><.001), heart failure readmission (DiD coefficient -0.48; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.19; <i>P</i><.002), and stroke mortality rates (DiD coefficient -0.56; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.19; <i>P</i><.01) than did nonteaching hospitals. There were no significant differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in other outcomes before vs after policy change. <b>Conclusions</b> After the 2017 duty hour policy change, there was no evidence of worsening of hospital quality or patient experience in teaching hospitals, compared to nonteaching hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"17 4","pages":"486-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of the 2017 ACGME US Resident Duty Hour Policy Change With Hospital Quality and Patient Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Maya L Hunt, Jeanette W Chung, Yue-Yung Hu, Karl Y Bilimoria, Amy L Holmstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00960.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> In 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) updated select US residency duty hour requirements to improve continuity of care and resident education. It is unknown if this policy change affected hospital quality of care and patient experience. <b>Objective</b> To evaluate the association of the 2017 duty hour policy change with hospital quality and patient experience in teaching vs nonteaching hospitals. <b>Methods</b> In this observational difference-in-differences (DiD) study, hospital quality (patient outcomes) and patient experience metrics were obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services <i>Care Compare</i> data from before (July 1, 2014-June 30, 2016) and after (July 1, 2017-June 30, 2019) the 2017 policy change in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Primary outcomes include hospital quality (five 30-day readmission indicator rates, five 30-day mortality rates, 8 patient safety indicators), and patient experience (5 measures from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey). <b>Results</b> A total of 2935 hospitals (250 teaching; 2685 nonteaching) were included. When comparing before and after the 2017 policy change, teaching hospitals had greater reductions in hospital-wide readmission (DiD coefficient -0.26; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.18; <i>P</i><.001), heart failure readmission (DiD coefficient -0.48; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.19; <i>P</i><.002), and stroke mortality rates (DiD coefficient -0.56; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.19; <i>P</i><.01) than did nonteaching hospitals. There were no significant differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in other outcomes before vs after policy change. <b>Conclusions</b> After the 2017 duty hour policy change, there was no evidence of worsening of hospital quality or patient experience in teaching hospitals, compared to nonteaching hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"486-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00960.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00960.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of the 2017 ACGME US Resident Duty Hour Policy Change With Hospital Quality and Patient Experience.
Background In 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) updated select US residency duty hour requirements to improve continuity of care and resident education. It is unknown if this policy change affected hospital quality of care and patient experience. Objective To evaluate the association of the 2017 duty hour policy change with hospital quality and patient experience in teaching vs nonteaching hospitals. Methods In this observational difference-in-differences (DiD) study, hospital quality (patient outcomes) and patient experience metrics were obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Care Compare data from before (July 1, 2014-June 30, 2016) and after (July 1, 2017-June 30, 2019) the 2017 policy change in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Primary outcomes include hospital quality (five 30-day readmission indicator rates, five 30-day mortality rates, 8 patient safety indicators), and patient experience (5 measures from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey). Results A total of 2935 hospitals (250 teaching; 2685 nonteaching) were included. When comparing before and after the 2017 policy change, teaching hospitals had greater reductions in hospital-wide readmission (DiD coefficient -0.26; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.18; P<.001), heart failure readmission (DiD coefficient -0.48; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.19; P<.002), and stroke mortality rates (DiD coefficient -0.56; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.19; P<.01) than did nonteaching hospitals. There were no significant differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in other outcomes before vs after policy change. Conclusions After the 2017 duty hour policy change, there was no evidence of worsening of hospital quality or patient experience in teaching hospitals, compared to nonteaching hospitals.
期刊介绍:
- Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.