淋巴结阳性作为可切除三阴性乳腺癌预后指标的对数赔率。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Chenchen Zheng, Jingjing Huang, Shengping Zhao, Yuxi Peng, Qian Xiong, Xumei Li, Jiangming Xiang, Jie Jian
{"title":"淋巴结阳性作为可切除三阴性乳腺癌预后指标的对数赔率。","authors":"Chenchen Zheng, Jingjing Huang, Shengping Zhao, Yuxi Peng, Qian Xiong, Xumei Li, Jiangming Xiang, Jie Jian","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-15209-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in resectable nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its potential role in informing postoperative treatment decisions. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER 17 registries, including patients aged 20-79 diagnosed with TNBC. The association between LODDS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed using the restrictive cubic splines (RCS) method. Propensity score matching (PSM) and survival analysis were employed to evaluate the effect of LODDS on treatment outcomes. Between 2010 and 2021, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) emerged as the predominant surgical approach for resectable nonmetastatic TNBC, with its proportion increasing from 49.3 to 52.1%, while mastectomy rates declined from 46.5 to 38.9%. RCS analysis identified a significant nonlinear association (p < 0.001) between LODDS and CSS, with a threshold value of -1.6 effectively categorizing patients into low-risk (LODDS < -1.6) and high-risk (LODDS > -1.6) groups. Patients in the low-risk group exhibited superior survival, with 5-year and 10-year CSS rates improving by 7.3% and 8.4%, respectively, following PSM. Notably, BCS was associated with better survival outcomes compared to mastectomy, particularly in high-risk LODDS patients. Stratified analysis by LODDS and age revealed that BCS followed by radiotherapy conferred the most substantial survival benefit. LODDS is a reliable prognostic marker for survival outcomes in resectable nonmetastatic TNBC. Incorporating LODDS into age-based risk stratification can facilitate more personalized postoperative management following BCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"30348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a prognostic marker in resectable triple negative breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chenchen Zheng, Jingjing Huang, Shengping Zhao, Yuxi Peng, Qian Xiong, Xumei Li, Jiangming Xiang, Jie Jian\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-15209-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in resectable nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its potential role in informing postoperative treatment decisions. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER 17 registries, including patients aged 20-79 diagnosed with TNBC. The association between LODDS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed using the restrictive cubic splines (RCS) method. Propensity score matching (PSM) and survival analysis were employed to evaluate the effect of LODDS on treatment outcomes. Between 2010 and 2021, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) emerged as the predominant surgical approach for resectable nonmetastatic TNBC, with its proportion increasing from 49.3 to 52.1%, while mastectomy rates declined from 46.5 to 38.9%. RCS analysis identified a significant nonlinear association (p < 0.001) between LODDS and CSS, with a threshold value of -1.6 effectively categorizing patients into low-risk (LODDS < -1.6) and high-risk (LODDS > -1.6) groups. Patients in the low-risk group exhibited superior survival, with 5-year and 10-year CSS rates improving by 7.3% and 8.4%, respectively, following PSM. Notably, BCS was associated with better survival outcomes compared to mastectomy, particularly in high-risk LODDS patients. Stratified analysis by LODDS and age revealed that BCS followed by radiotherapy conferred the most substantial survival benefit. LODDS is a reliable prognostic marker for survival outcomes in resectable nonmetastatic TNBC. Incorporating LODDS into age-based risk stratification can facilitate more personalized postoperative management following BCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"30348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15209-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15209-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估可切除的非转移性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中阳性淋巴结(LODDS)的对数赔率的预后价值及其在告知术后治疗决策中的潜在作用。回顾性队列研究使用来自SEER 17登记的数据,包括20-79岁诊断为TNBC的患者。使用限制性三次样条(RCS)方法分析LODDS与癌症特异性生存(CSS)之间的关系。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和生存分析来评估LODDS对治疗结果的影响。2010年至2021年间,保乳手术(BCS)成为可切除的非转移性TNBC的主要手术方式,其比例从49.3%上升到52.1%,而乳房切除术率从46.5%下降到38.9%。RCS分析发现了显著的非线性关联(p -1.6)组。低风险组患者表现出更高的生存率,PSM后5年和10年的CSS率分别提高了7.3%和8.4%。值得注意的是,与乳房切除术相比,BCS与更好的生存结果相关,特别是在高风险LODDS患者中。LODDS和年龄的分层分析显示,BCS后放疗可获得最显著的生存益处。LODDS是可切除的非转移性TNBC存活结果的可靠预后指标。将LODDS纳入基于年龄的风险分层可以促进BCS术后更个性化的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a prognostic marker in resectable triple negative breast cancer.

This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in resectable nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its potential role in informing postoperative treatment decisions. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER 17 registries, including patients aged 20-79 diagnosed with TNBC. The association between LODDS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed using the restrictive cubic splines (RCS) method. Propensity score matching (PSM) and survival analysis were employed to evaluate the effect of LODDS on treatment outcomes. Between 2010 and 2021, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) emerged as the predominant surgical approach for resectable nonmetastatic TNBC, with its proportion increasing from 49.3 to 52.1%, while mastectomy rates declined from 46.5 to 38.9%. RCS analysis identified a significant nonlinear association (p < 0.001) between LODDS and CSS, with a threshold value of -1.6 effectively categorizing patients into low-risk (LODDS < -1.6) and high-risk (LODDS > -1.6) groups. Patients in the low-risk group exhibited superior survival, with 5-year and 10-year CSS rates improving by 7.3% and 8.4%, respectively, following PSM. Notably, BCS was associated with better survival outcomes compared to mastectomy, particularly in high-risk LODDS patients. Stratified analysis by LODDS and age revealed that BCS followed by radiotherapy conferred the most substantial survival benefit. LODDS is a reliable prognostic marker for survival outcomes in resectable nonmetastatic TNBC. Incorporating LODDS into age-based risk stratification can facilitate more personalized postoperative management following BCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信