{"title":"冠和嵌体尺寸变化对各种数字印模技术精度的影响。","authors":"Xia Wu, Haigang Shao, Yimei Qi, Xusheng Wu, Jiawen Kong, Meng Chu, Yuchuan Xu, Qixuan Huang, Heng Bo Jiang, Jae Mok Lee, Qi Chen","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-15912-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate digital impressions are crucial in modern dentistry, particularly for capturing fine details of various dental preparations. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of variations in the sizes of crown and inlay specimen on the accuracy of three digital impression techniques. Nine crown and nine inlay specimens were fabricated according to American Dental Association Standard No. 132. Gold standard measurements were obtained using a coordinate-measuring machine. Digitized files were generated using three impression techniques (n = 10): intraoral scanner (IOS), extraoral scanner with alginate (EOS-A), and extraoral scanner with silicone rubber (EOS-S). Digital models from EOSs served as reference sets for three-dimensional (3D) fitting analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test. Specimen size variations significantly affected the accuracy of all impression techniques (p < 0.05). IOS exhibited superior accuracy across all specimens, with most trueness values falling within the clinical threshold. EOS-S demonstrated moderate trueness, meeting the threshold for most indexes, except the r<sub>a</sub> index in A<sub>2</sub> and C<sub>1</sub> crowns. EOS-A met the threshold only for A<sub>3</sub> crown. All techniques achieved clinical precision thresholds, except for the r<sub>d</sub> index of A<sub>1</sub> in the EOS-A inlay specimens, for which a slight exceedance was observed. Additionally, 3D fitting analysis revealed more pronounced deviations in the EOS-A group. The accuracy of digital impressions technique is influenced by variations in the size of crowns and inlays. This study highlights the significant impact of specimen size on the accuracy of digital impression techniques, providing valuable insights for enhancing restorative dentistry outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"30487"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of crown and inlay size variations on the accuracy of various digital impression techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Xia Wu, Haigang Shao, Yimei Qi, Xusheng Wu, Jiawen Kong, Meng Chu, Yuchuan Xu, Qixuan Huang, Heng Bo Jiang, Jae Mok Lee, Qi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-15912-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate digital impressions are crucial in modern dentistry, particularly for capturing fine details of various dental preparations. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of variations in the sizes of crown and inlay specimen on the accuracy of three digital impression techniques. Nine crown and nine inlay specimens were fabricated according to American Dental Association Standard No. 132. Gold standard measurements were obtained using a coordinate-measuring machine. Digitized files were generated using three impression techniques (n = 10): intraoral scanner (IOS), extraoral scanner with alginate (EOS-A), and extraoral scanner with silicone rubber (EOS-S). Digital models from EOSs served as reference sets for three-dimensional (3D) fitting analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test. Specimen size variations significantly affected the accuracy of all impression techniques (p < 0.05). IOS exhibited superior accuracy across all specimens, with most trueness values falling within the clinical threshold. EOS-S demonstrated moderate trueness, meeting the threshold for most indexes, except the r<sub>a</sub> index in A<sub>2</sub> and C<sub>1</sub> crowns. EOS-A met the threshold only for A<sub>3</sub> crown. All techniques achieved clinical precision thresholds, except for the r<sub>d</sub> index of A<sub>1</sub> in the EOS-A inlay specimens, for which a slight exceedance was observed. Additionally, 3D fitting analysis revealed more pronounced deviations in the EOS-A group. The accuracy of digital impressions technique is influenced by variations in the size of crowns and inlays. This study highlights the significant impact of specimen size on the accuracy of digital impression techniques, providing valuable insights for enhancing restorative dentistry outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"30487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365023/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15912-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15912-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of crown and inlay size variations on the accuracy of various digital impression techniques.
Accurate digital impressions are crucial in modern dentistry, particularly for capturing fine details of various dental preparations. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of variations in the sizes of crown and inlay specimen on the accuracy of three digital impression techniques. Nine crown and nine inlay specimens were fabricated according to American Dental Association Standard No. 132. Gold standard measurements were obtained using a coordinate-measuring machine. Digitized files were generated using three impression techniques (n = 10): intraoral scanner (IOS), extraoral scanner with alginate (EOS-A), and extraoral scanner with silicone rubber (EOS-S). Digital models from EOSs served as reference sets for three-dimensional (3D) fitting analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test. Specimen size variations significantly affected the accuracy of all impression techniques (p < 0.05). IOS exhibited superior accuracy across all specimens, with most trueness values falling within the clinical threshold. EOS-S demonstrated moderate trueness, meeting the threshold for most indexes, except the ra index in A2 and C1 crowns. EOS-A met the threshold only for A3 crown. All techniques achieved clinical precision thresholds, except for the rd index of A1 in the EOS-A inlay specimens, for which a slight exceedance was observed. Additionally, 3D fitting analysis revealed more pronounced deviations in the EOS-A group. The accuracy of digital impressions technique is influenced by variations in the size of crowns and inlays. This study highlights the significant impact of specimen size on the accuracy of digital impression techniques, providing valuable insights for enhancing restorative dentistry outcomes.
期刊介绍：
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
