荷兰晚期非小细胞肺癌液体活检新一代测序的临床应用。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Tessa J J de Bitter, Maartje J Geerlings, Leonie I Kroeze, Daniel von Rhein, Milou M F Schuurbiers, Janne M Bibbe, Joyce A M G Smeijers, Hicham Ouchene, Christian Gilissen, Tom G J Hofste, Marjan M Weiss, Lisenka E L M Vissers, Michel M van den Heuvel, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
{"title":"荷兰晚期非小细胞肺癌液体活检新一代测序的临床应用。","authors":"Tessa J J de Bitter, Maartje J Geerlings, Leonie I Kroeze, Daniel von Rhein, Milou M F Schuurbiers, Janne M Bibbe, Joyce A M G Smeijers, Hicham Ouchene, Christian Gilissen, Tom G J Hofste, Marjan M Weiss, Lisenka E L M Vissers, Michel M van den Heuvel, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-13667-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor molecular profiling is essential for therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a biopsy is not for every patient possible and can have complications, which plasma derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis could overcome. We assessed the clinical utility of ctDNA next-generation sequencing (ctDNA-NGS) in 72 NSCLC patients, including 59 who underwent both standard of care (SoC) tissue- or cytology-based genotyping and ctDNA-NGS and 13 who underwent only ctDNA-NGS. Hypothetical shifts in diagnostic yield of a ctDNA-first strategy were modelled using real-world NSCLC molecular testing data from The Netherlands. Concordance between SoC and ctDNA-NGS was 71.2%. In fifteen patients (25.4%) results were discordant, but without direct therapeutic impact. In two patients (3.4%), ctDNA-NGS missed an actionable driver, which would directly impact therapy. Hypothetical shifts in diagnostic yield of a ctDNA-first strategy were determined. This predicted a 7.0% decrease in diagnostic yield for (non-) actionable drivers if all patients underwent ctDNA-NGS, including those currently tested in SoC and those not. Offering ctDNA-NGS only to patients not tested in SoC would increase the diagnostic yield by 6.7%. In conclusion, ctDNA-NGS shows promise for predictive diagnostics in advanced NSCLC, offering added value alongside SoC, but comes with assay-specific and biological challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"30343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Tessa J J de Bitter, Maartje J Geerlings, Leonie I Kroeze, Daniel von Rhein, Milou M F Schuurbiers, Janne M Bibbe, Joyce A M G Smeijers, Hicham Ouchene, Christian Gilissen, Tom G J Hofste, Marjan M Weiss, Lisenka E L M Vissers, Michel M van den Heuvel, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-13667-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tumor molecular profiling is essential for therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a biopsy is not for every patient possible and can have complications, which plasma derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis could overcome. We assessed the clinical utility of ctDNA next-generation sequencing (ctDNA-NGS) in 72 NSCLC patients, including 59 who underwent both standard of care (SoC) tissue- or cytology-based genotyping and ctDNA-NGS and 13 who underwent only ctDNA-NGS. Hypothetical shifts in diagnostic yield of a ctDNA-first strategy were modelled using real-world NSCLC molecular testing data from The Netherlands. Concordance between SoC and ctDNA-NGS was 71.2%. In fifteen patients (25.4%) results were discordant, but without direct therapeutic impact. In two patients (3.4%), ctDNA-NGS missed an actionable driver, which would directly impact therapy. Hypothetical shifts in diagnostic yield of a ctDNA-first strategy were determined. This predicted a 7.0% decrease in diagnostic yield for (non-) actionable drivers if all patients underwent ctDNA-NGS, including those currently tested in SoC and those not. Offering ctDNA-NGS only to patients not tested in SoC would increase the diagnostic yield by 6.7%. In conclusion, ctDNA-NGS shows promise for predictive diagnostics in advanced NSCLC, offering added value alongside SoC, but comes with assay-specific and biological challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"30343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365262/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13667-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13667-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤分子谱分析对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗管理至关重要。然而,活组织检查并非适用于所有患者,而且可能会产生并发症,而血浆衍生循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)分析可以克服这一问题。我们在72例NSCLC患者中评估了ctDNA下一代测序(ctDNA- ngs)的临床应用,其中59例接受了基于组织或细胞学的标准护理(SoC)基因分型和ctDNA- ngs, 13例仅接受ctDNA- ngs。使用来自荷兰的真实NSCLC分子检测数据,对ctdna优先策略的诊断率的假设变化进行了建模。SoC与ctDNA-NGS的一致性为71.2%。15例患者(25.4%)结果不一致,但没有直接的治疗影响。在两名患者(3.4%)中,ctDNA-NGS遗漏了一个可操作的驱动因素,这将直接影响治疗。确定了ctdna优先策略的诊断率的假设变化。如果所有患者都接受ctDNA-NGS(包括目前在SoC中检测的患者和未在SoC中检测的患者),则预测(非)可操作驱动因素的诊出率将下降7.0%。仅向未进行SoC检测的患者提供ctDNA-NGS将使诊断率提高6.7%。总之,ctDNA-NGS在晚期非小细胞肺癌的预测诊断中显示出前景,在SoC之外提供了附加价值,但存在分析特异性和生物学方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands.

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands.

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands.

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands.

Tumor molecular profiling is essential for therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a biopsy is not for every patient possible and can have complications, which plasma derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis could overcome. We assessed the clinical utility of ctDNA next-generation sequencing (ctDNA-NGS) in 72 NSCLC patients, including 59 who underwent both standard of care (SoC) tissue- or cytology-based genotyping and ctDNA-NGS and 13 who underwent only ctDNA-NGS. Hypothetical shifts in diagnostic yield of a ctDNA-first strategy were modelled using real-world NSCLC molecular testing data from The Netherlands. Concordance between SoC and ctDNA-NGS was 71.2%. In fifteen patients (25.4%) results were discordant, but without direct therapeutic impact. In two patients (3.4%), ctDNA-NGS missed an actionable driver, which would directly impact therapy. Hypothetical shifts in diagnostic yield of a ctDNA-first strategy were determined. This predicted a 7.0% decrease in diagnostic yield for (non-) actionable drivers if all patients underwent ctDNA-NGS, including those currently tested in SoC and those not. Offering ctDNA-NGS only to patients not tested in SoC would increase the diagnostic yield by 6.7%. In conclusion, ctDNA-NGS shows promise for predictive diagnostics in advanced NSCLC, offering added value alongside SoC, but comes with assay-specific and biological challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信