从标记选择到系统发育分析的菌株特异性简单序列重复序列的建立及遗传多样性评价。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hyeonheui Ham, Yong Hwan Lee, Sang Hyun Moh, Won Kyong Cho
{"title":"从标记选择到系统发育分析的菌株特异性简单序列重复序列的建立及遗传多样性评价。","authors":"Hyeonheui Ham, Yong Hwan Lee, Sang Hyun Moh, Won Kyong Cho","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-15530-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Erwinia amylovora is a highly destructive phytopathogenic bacterium that causes fire blight in Rosaceae plants, particularly apple and pear trees. Due to its status as a quarantine organism in many countries, extensive epidemiological and genotypic studies have been conducted to better understand and manage this pathogen. This study presents a novel workflow for identifying strain-specific simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in bacterial genomes, focusing on E. amylovora. Leveraging the abundance of available genome data, the workflow involves identifying single-copy genes via BLASTX searches, followed by SSR identification using the MISA tool and validation through sequence alignment. Utilizing the genome of E. amylovora strain CFBP 1430 as a reference, 27 SSRs within 26 single-copy genes were identified, displaying diverse repeat patterns and lengths. Five genes containing SSRs were selected, offering valuable markers for strain differentiation. Phylogenetic analysis of 114 E. amylovora strains revealed three distinct groups: widely prevalent, Western NA, and Eastern NA clades, in line with previous findings. A comparative analysis with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) analysis and multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) highlighted differences in marker selection strategies and underscored the need to validate findings using multiple genotyping approaches. While limitations remain due to incomplete nucleotide sequences in public databases, this study advances our understanding of the genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary dynamics of E. amylovora strains, and positions SSR-based methods as a complementary tool alongside other established techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"30357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of strain specific simple sequence repeats and assessment of genetic diversity in Erwinia amylovora from marker selection to phylogenetic analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeonheui Ham, Yong Hwan Lee, Sang Hyun Moh, Won Kyong Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-15530-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Erwinia amylovora is a highly destructive phytopathogenic bacterium that causes fire blight in Rosaceae plants, particularly apple and pear trees. Due to its status as a quarantine organism in many countries, extensive epidemiological and genotypic studies have been conducted to better understand and manage this pathogen. This study presents a novel workflow for identifying strain-specific simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in bacterial genomes, focusing on E. amylovora. Leveraging the abundance of available genome data, the workflow involves identifying single-copy genes via BLASTX searches, followed by SSR identification using the MISA tool and validation through sequence alignment. Utilizing the genome of E. amylovora strain CFBP 1430 as a reference, 27 SSRs within 26 single-copy genes were identified, displaying diverse repeat patterns and lengths. Five genes containing SSRs were selected, offering valuable markers for strain differentiation. Phylogenetic analysis of 114 E. amylovora strains revealed three distinct groups: widely prevalent, Western NA, and Eastern NA clades, in line with previous findings. A comparative analysis with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) analysis and multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) highlighted differences in marker selection strategies and underscored the need to validate findings using multiple genotyping approaches. While limitations remain due to incomplete nucleotide sequences in public databases, this study advances our understanding of the genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary dynamics of E. amylovora strains, and positions SSR-based methods as a complementary tool alongside other established techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"30357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365104/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15530-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15530-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淀粉状Erwinia amylovora是一种极具破坏性的植物致病菌,可引起蔷薇科植物,特别是苹果和梨树的火疫病。由于其在许多国家作为检疫生物的地位,已经进行了广泛的流行病学和基因型研究,以更好地了解和管理这种病原体。本研究提出了一种在细菌基因组中鉴定菌株特异性简单序列重复序列(SSRs)的新工作流程,重点研究了E. amylovora。利用丰富的可用基因组数据,工作流程包括通过BLASTX搜索识别单拷贝基因,然后使用MISA工具进行SSR鉴定,并通过序列比对进行验证。以amylovora菌株CFBP 1430的基因组为参考,在26个单拷贝基因中鉴定出27个SSRs,它们具有不同的重复模式和长度。筛选出5个含有SSRs的基因,为菌株分化提供了有价值的标记。114株amylovora菌株的系统发育分析显示了3个不同的类群:广泛流行的,西部NA和东部NA分支,与先前的研究结果一致。与聚类规则间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)分析和多位点可变数串联重复序列分析(MLVA)的比较分析突出了标记选择策略的差异,并强调了使用多种基因分型方法验证研究结果的必要性。虽然由于公共数据库中核苷酸序列的不完整仍然存在局限性,但本研究促进了我们对amylovora菌株的遗传多样性,种群结构和进化动力学的理解,并将基于ssr的方法定位为与其他已建立的技术相补充的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of strain specific simple sequence repeats and assessment of genetic diversity in Erwinia amylovora from marker selection to phylogenetic analysis.

Erwinia amylovora is a highly destructive phytopathogenic bacterium that causes fire blight in Rosaceae plants, particularly apple and pear trees. Due to its status as a quarantine organism in many countries, extensive epidemiological and genotypic studies have been conducted to better understand and manage this pathogen. This study presents a novel workflow for identifying strain-specific simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in bacterial genomes, focusing on E. amylovora. Leveraging the abundance of available genome data, the workflow involves identifying single-copy genes via BLASTX searches, followed by SSR identification using the MISA tool and validation through sequence alignment. Utilizing the genome of E. amylovora strain CFBP 1430 as a reference, 27 SSRs within 26 single-copy genes were identified, displaying diverse repeat patterns and lengths. Five genes containing SSRs were selected, offering valuable markers for strain differentiation. Phylogenetic analysis of 114 E. amylovora strains revealed three distinct groups: widely prevalent, Western NA, and Eastern NA clades, in line with previous findings. A comparative analysis with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) analysis and multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) highlighted differences in marker selection strategies and underscored the need to validate findings using multiple genotyping approaches. While limitations remain due to incomplete nucleotide sequences in public databases, this study advances our understanding of the genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary dynamics of E. amylovora strains, and positions SSR-based methods as a complementary tool alongside other established techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信