微创后路SI关节融合与新型皮质同种异体移植物:现实世界,长期,来自大型,多部位美国队列的结果。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S538286
Chris Bovinet, Ajay Antony, Nomen Azeem, Pankaj Mehta, Richard S Epter, Vivek Velagapudi, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Christopher M Lam, Dawood Sayed
{"title":"微创后路SI关节融合与新型皮质同种异体移植物:现实世界,长期,来自大型,多部位美国队列的结果。","authors":"Chris Bovinet, Ajay Antony, Nomen Azeem, Pankaj Mehta, Richard S Epter, Vivek Velagapudi, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Christopher M Lam, Dawood Sayed","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S538286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction accounts for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain. Primary treatments of SI joint dysfunction include medications, bracing, physical therapy, injections, and ablations. When primary non-surgical treatments are unsuccessful, fusion or stabilization may be considered. Here, we report a multicenter study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of posterior sacroiliac joint fusion using cortical allograft across six United States clinical sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis through physical examination and diagnostic injection who have failed conservative management that ultimately underwent percutaneous allograft implant with at least 6 months of follow up were included. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographic and clinical characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and patient-reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics, and proportion of patients achieving minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Paired t-tests were employed to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 patients were included. Of these, 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men, with a mean age of 69.2 years and an average body mass index of 29.6 kg/m². Average NRS at baseline was 7.61 ± 1.64 and 1.60 ± 1.86 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up visit. The mean pain reduction from baseline to the last follow-up (91.2 week mean or 1.75 years) was 6.01 points, exceeding MCID. The safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings affirm that posterior SI joint fusion constitutes an effective and enduring treatment option for patients suffering from SI joint dysfunction unresponsive to conservative care. The results indicate that posterior SI joint fusion is safe and effective at achieving sustained pain relief. Our findings are congruent with previously published studies and provide further evidence of sustained durable pain outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"381-390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Chris Bovinet, Ajay Antony, Nomen Azeem, Pankaj Mehta, Richard S Epter, Vivek Velagapudi, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Christopher M Lam, Dawood Sayed\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ORR.S538286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction accounts for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain. Primary treatments of SI joint dysfunction include medications, bracing, physical therapy, injections, and ablations. When primary non-surgical treatments are unsuccessful, fusion or stabilization may be considered. Here, we report a multicenter study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of posterior sacroiliac joint fusion using cortical allograft across six United States clinical sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis through physical examination and diagnostic injection who have failed conservative management that ultimately underwent percutaneous allograft implant with at least 6 months of follow up were included. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographic and clinical characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and patient-reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics, and proportion of patients achieving minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Paired t-tests were employed to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 patients were included. Of these, 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men, with a mean age of 69.2 years and an average body mass index of 29.6 kg/m². Average NRS at baseline was 7.61 ± 1.64 and 1.60 ± 1.86 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up visit. The mean pain reduction from baseline to the last follow-up (91.2 week mean or 1.75 years) was 6.01 points, exceeding MCID. The safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings affirm that posterior SI joint fusion constitutes an effective and enduring treatment option for patients suffering from SI joint dysfunction unresponsive to conservative care. The results indicate that posterior SI joint fusion is safe and effective at achieving sustained pain relief. Our findings are congruent with previously published studies and provide further evidence of sustained durable pain outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"381-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S538286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S538286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骶髂(SI)关节功能障碍占报告的腰痛的15%至30%。SI关节功能障碍的主要治疗包括药物、支具、物理治疗、注射和消融。当主要的非手术治疗不成功时,可以考虑融合或稳定。在这里,我们报告了一项多中心研究,旨在评估在美国六个临床地点使用皮质同种异体移植物进行骶髂后关节融合的实际结果。方法:纳入经体检和诊断性注射诊断为骶髂炎的患者,保守治疗失败,最终行经皮同种异体植入术,随访至少6个月。从电子健康记录中提取的数据包括人口统计学和临床特征、数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分和患者报告的不良事件。使用描述性统计总结基线特征,并评估达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者比例。采用配对t检验比较术前和术后结果。结果:共纳入258例患者。其中女性占63.9%,男性占36.1%,平均年龄69.2岁,平均体重指数29.6 kg/m²。基线时平均NRS为7.61±1.64,末次随访时平均NRS为1.60±1.86 (p < 0.05)。从基线到最后一次随访(平均91.2周或1.75年)的平均疼痛减轻为6.01分,超过了MCID。安全性是有利的,在这个队列中没有严重的不良事件报告。结论:我们的研究结果证实,对于保守治疗无反应的SI关节功能障碍患者,后路SI关节融合是一种有效且持久的治疗选择。结果表明后路SI关节融合是安全有效的,可以实现持续的疼痛缓解。我们的发现与先前发表的研究一致,并提供了持续持久疼痛结果的进一步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.

Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.

Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.

Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.

Purpose: Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction accounts for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain. Primary treatments of SI joint dysfunction include medications, bracing, physical therapy, injections, and ablations. When primary non-surgical treatments are unsuccessful, fusion or stabilization may be considered. Here, we report a multicenter study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of posterior sacroiliac joint fusion using cortical allograft across six United States clinical sites.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis through physical examination and diagnostic injection who have failed conservative management that ultimately underwent percutaneous allograft implant with at least 6 months of follow up were included. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographic and clinical characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and patient-reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics, and proportion of patients achieving minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Paired t-tests were employed to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes.

Results: A total of 258 patients were included. Of these, 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men, with a mean age of 69.2 years and an average body mass index of 29.6 kg/m². Average NRS at baseline was 7.61 ± 1.64 and 1.60 ± 1.86 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up visit. The mean pain reduction from baseline to the last follow-up (91.2 week mean or 1.75 years) was 6.01 points, exceeding MCID. The safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported in this cohort.

Conclusion: Our findings affirm that posterior SI joint fusion constitutes an effective and enduring treatment option for patients suffering from SI joint dysfunction unresponsive to conservative care. The results indicate that posterior SI joint fusion is safe and effective at achieving sustained pain relief. Our findings are congruent with previously published studies and provide further evidence of sustained durable pain outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信