Chris Bovinet, Ajay Antony, Nomen Azeem, Pankaj Mehta, Richard S Epter, Vivek Velagapudi, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Christopher M Lam, Dawood Sayed
{"title":"微创后路SI关节融合与新型皮质同种异体移植物:现实世界,长期,来自大型,多部位美国队列的结果。","authors":"Chris Bovinet, Ajay Antony, Nomen Azeem, Pankaj Mehta, Richard S Epter, Vivek Velagapudi, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Christopher M Lam, Dawood Sayed","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S538286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction accounts for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain. Primary treatments of SI joint dysfunction include medications, bracing, physical therapy, injections, and ablations. When primary non-surgical treatments are unsuccessful, fusion or stabilization may be considered. Here, we report a multicenter study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of posterior sacroiliac joint fusion using cortical allograft across six United States clinical sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis through physical examination and diagnostic injection who have failed conservative management that ultimately underwent percutaneous allograft implant with at least 6 months of follow up were included. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographic and clinical characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and patient-reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics, and proportion of patients achieving minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Paired t-tests were employed to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 patients were included. Of these, 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men, with a mean age of 69.2 years and an average body mass index of 29.6 kg/m². Average NRS at baseline was 7.61 ± 1.64 and 1.60 ± 1.86 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up visit. The mean pain reduction from baseline to the last follow-up (91.2 week mean or 1.75 years) was 6.01 points, exceeding MCID. The safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings affirm that posterior SI joint fusion constitutes an effective and enduring treatment option for patients suffering from SI joint dysfunction unresponsive to conservative care. The results indicate that posterior SI joint fusion is safe and effective at achieving sustained pain relief. Our findings are congruent with previously published studies and provide further evidence of sustained durable pain outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"381-390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Chris Bovinet, Ajay Antony, Nomen Azeem, Pankaj Mehta, Richard S Epter, Vivek Velagapudi, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Christopher M Lam, Dawood Sayed\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ORR.S538286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction accounts for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain. Primary treatments of SI joint dysfunction include medications, bracing, physical therapy, injections, and ablations. When primary non-surgical treatments are unsuccessful, fusion or stabilization may be considered. Here, we report a multicenter study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of posterior sacroiliac joint fusion using cortical allograft across six United States clinical sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis through physical examination and diagnostic injection who have failed conservative management that ultimately underwent percutaneous allograft implant with at least 6 months of follow up were included. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographic and clinical characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and patient-reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics, and proportion of patients achieving minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Paired t-tests were employed to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 patients were included. Of these, 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men, with a mean age of 69.2 years and an average body mass index of 29.6 kg/m². Average NRS at baseline was 7.61 ± 1.64 and 1.60 ± 1.86 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up visit. The mean pain reduction from baseline to the last follow-up (91.2 week mean or 1.75 years) was 6.01 points, exceeding MCID. The safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings affirm that posterior SI joint fusion constitutes an effective and enduring treatment option for patients suffering from SI joint dysfunction unresponsive to conservative care. The results indicate that posterior SI joint fusion is safe and effective at achieving sustained pain relief. Our findings are congruent with previously published studies and provide further evidence of sustained durable pain outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"381-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S538286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S538286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.
Purpose: Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction accounts for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain. Primary treatments of SI joint dysfunction include medications, bracing, physical therapy, injections, and ablations. When primary non-surgical treatments are unsuccessful, fusion or stabilization may be considered. Here, we report a multicenter study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of posterior sacroiliac joint fusion using cortical allograft across six United States clinical sites.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis through physical examination and diagnostic injection who have failed conservative management that ultimately underwent percutaneous allograft implant with at least 6 months of follow up were included. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographic and clinical characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and patient-reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics, and proportion of patients achieving minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Paired t-tests were employed to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes.
Results: A total of 258 patients were included. Of these, 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men, with a mean age of 69.2 years and an average body mass index of 29.6 kg/m². Average NRS at baseline was 7.61 ± 1.64 and 1.60 ± 1.86 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up visit. The mean pain reduction from baseline to the last follow-up (91.2 week mean or 1.75 years) was 6.01 points, exceeding MCID. The safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported in this cohort.
Conclusion: Our findings affirm that posterior SI joint fusion constitutes an effective and enduring treatment option for patients suffering from SI joint dysfunction unresponsive to conservative care. The results indicate that posterior SI joint fusion is safe and effective at achieving sustained pain relief. Our findings are congruent with previously published studies and provide further evidence of sustained durable pain outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.