心输出量测量技术的比较:猪的热稀释与双心室压力-容量环路记录。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Simone Juel Dragsbaek, Mathilde Emilie Kirk, Cecilie Dahl Baltsen, Asger Andersen, Mads Dam Lyhne
{"title":"心输出量测量技术的比较:猪的热稀释与双心室压力-容量环路记录。","authors":"Simone Juel Dragsbaek, Mathilde Emilie Kirk, Cecilie Dahl Baltsen, Asger Andersen, Mads Dam Lyhne","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac output (CO) measurement is crucial in cardiovascular research. Pressure-volume (PV) loop recordings provide detailed information on cardiac function, including CO. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from biventricular PV loop recordings with thermodilution (TD) as a reference method in pigs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The TD-CO was measured by right heart catheterisation. The PV-derived CO was obtained from both ventricles simultaneously, both during ongoing ventilation and in transient apnoea. Data were compared using the Bland-Altman method. The percentage error (PE%) and linear regression were calculated between the TD-CO and PV-derived CO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simultaneous CO measurements from 43 pigs were analysed. Compared to thermodilution, the lowest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the left ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.02 L/min, 95% confidence interval [0.2-0.3]) with a PE% of 30% during ongoing ventilation. The highest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the right ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.9 L/min, 95% CI [0.5-1.3]) with a PE% of 67% during ongoing ventilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PV-derived CO from the left ventricle showed very good agreement with TD-CO, with minimal bias, while PV-CO measurements from the right ventricle showed higher inaccuracy, likely due to anatomical differences between the ventricles.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques: Thermodilution Versus Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Recordings in Pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Juel Dragsbaek, Mathilde Emilie Kirk, Cecilie Dahl Baltsen, Asger Andersen, Mads Dam Lyhne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac output (CO) measurement is crucial in cardiovascular research. Pressure-volume (PV) loop recordings provide detailed information on cardiac function, including CO. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from biventricular PV loop recordings with thermodilution (TD) as a reference method in pigs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The TD-CO was measured by right heart catheterisation. The PV-derived CO was obtained from both ventricles simultaneously, both during ongoing ventilation and in transient apnoea. Data were compared using the Bland-Altman method. The percentage error (PE%) and linear regression were calculated between the TD-CO and PV-derived CO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simultaneous CO measurements from 43 pigs were analysed. Compared to thermodilution, the lowest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the left ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.02 L/min, 95% confidence interval [0.2-0.3]) with a PE% of 30% during ongoing ventilation. The highest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the right ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.9 L/min, 95% CI [0.5-1.3]) with a PE% of 67% during ongoing ventilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PV-derived CO from the left ventricle showed very good agreement with TD-CO, with minimal bias, while PV-CO measurements from the right ventricle showed higher inaccuracy, likely due to anatomical differences between the ventricles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心输出量(CO)测量在心血管研究中至关重要。压力-体积(PV)环路记录提供了包括CO在内的心功能的详细信息。本研究旨在比较猪双心室PV环路记录和热稀释(TD)作为参考方法获得的CO测量值。方法:采用右心导管法测定TD-CO。在持续通气和短暂性呼吸暂停期间,pv衍生的CO同时从两个心室获得。数据比较采用Bland-Altman方法。计算了TD-CO和pv -CO之间的百分比误差(PE%)和线性回归。结果:分析了43头猪同时测量的CO。与热稀释相比,持续通气期间左心室pv衍生CO的偏差最低(0.02 L/min, 95%可信区间[0.2-0.3]),持续通气期间PE%为30%。在持续通气期间,来自右心室的pv衍生CO偏差最大(0.9 L/min, 95% CI[0.5-1.3]),在持续通气期间PE%为67%。结论:左心室PV-CO测量结果与TD-CO测量结果非常吻合,偏差很小,而右心室PV-CO测量结果的不准确性较高,可能是由于两心室解剖结构的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques: Thermodilution Versus Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Recordings in Pigs.

Background: Cardiac output (CO) measurement is crucial in cardiovascular research. Pressure-volume (PV) loop recordings provide detailed information on cardiac function, including CO. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from biventricular PV loop recordings with thermodilution (TD) as a reference method in pigs.

Method: The TD-CO was measured by right heart catheterisation. The PV-derived CO was obtained from both ventricles simultaneously, both during ongoing ventilation and in transient apnoea. Data were compared using the Bland-Altman method. The percentage error (PE%) and linear regression were calculated between the TD-CO and PV-derived CO.

Results: Simultaneous CO measurements from 43 pigs were analysed. Compared to thermodilution, the lowest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the left ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.02 L/min, 95% confidence interval [0.2-0.3]) with a PE% of 30% during ongoing ventilation. The highest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the right ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.9 L/min, 95% CI [0.5-1.3]) with a PE% of 67% during ongoing ventilation.

Conclusions: PV-derived CO from the left ventricle showed very good agreement with TD-CO, with minimal bias, while PV-CO measurements from the right ventricle showed higher inaccuracy, likely due to anatomical differences between the ventricles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信