{"title":"心输出量测量技术的比较:猪的热稀释与双心室压力-容量环路记录。","authors":"Simone Juel Dragsbaek, Mathilde Emilie Kirk, Cecilie Dahl Baltsen, Asger Andersen, Mads Dam Lyhne","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac output (CO) measurement is crucial in cardiovascular research. Pressure-volume (PV) loop recordings provide detailed information on cardiac function, including CO. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from biventricular PV loop recordings with thermodilution (TD) as a reference method in pigs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The TD-CO was measured by right heart catheterisation. The PV-derived CO was obtained from both ventricles simultaneously, both during ongoing ventilation and in transient apnoea. Data were compared using the Bland-Altman method. The percentage error (PE%) and linear regression were calculated between the TD-CO and PV-derived CO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simultaneous CO measurements from 43 pigs were analysed. Compared to thermodilution, the lowest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the left ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.02 L/min, 95% confidence interval [0.2-0.3]) with a PE% of 30% during ongoing ventilation. The highest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the right ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.9 L/min, 95% CI [0.5-1.3]) with a PE% of 67% during ongoing ventilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PV-derived CO from the left ventricle showed very good agreement with TD-CO, with minimal bias, while PV-CO measurements from the right ventricle showed higher inaccuracy, likely due to anatomical differences between the ventricles.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques: Thermodilution Versus Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Recordings in Pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Juel Dragsbaek, Mathilde Emilie Kirk, Cecilie Dahl Baltsen, Asger Andersen, Mads Dam Lyhne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac output (CO) measurement is crucial in cardiovascular research. Pressure-volume (PV) loop recordings provide detailed information on cardiac function, including CO. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from biventricular PV loop recordings with thermodilution (TD) as a reference method in pigs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The TD-CO was measured by right heart catheterisation. The PV-derived CO was obtained from both ventricles simultaneously, both during ongoing ventilation and in transient apnoea. Data were compared using the Bland-Altman method. The percentage error (PE%) and linear regression were calculated between the TD-CO and PV-derived CO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simultaneous CO measurements from 43 pigs were analysed. Compared to thermodilution, the lowest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the left ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.02 L/min, 95% confidence interval [0.2-0.3]) with a PE% of 30% during ongoing ventilation. The highest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the right ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.9 L/min, 95% CI [0.5-1.3]) with a PE% of 67% during ongoing ventilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PV-derived CO from the left ventricle showed very good agreement with TD-CO, with minimal bias, while PV-CO measurements from the right ventricle showed higher inaccuracy, likely due to anatomical differences between the ventricles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques: Thermodilution Versus Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Recordings in Pigs.
Background: Cardiac output (CO) measurement is crucial in cardiovascular research. Pressure-volume (PV) loop recordings provide detailed information on cardiac function, including CO. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from biventricular PV loop recordings with thermodilution (TD) as a reference method in pigs.
Method: The TD-CO was measured by right heart catheterisation. The PV-derived CO was obtained from both ventricles simultaneously, both during ongoing ventilation and in transient apnoea. Data were compared using the Bland-Altman method. The percentage error (PE%) and linear regression were calculated between the TD-CO and PV-derived CO.
Results: Simultaneous CO measurements from 43 pigs were analysed. Compared to thermodilution, the lowest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the left ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.02 L/min, 95% confidence interval [0.2-0.3]) with a PE% of 30% during ongoing ventilation. The highest bias was found in PV-derived CO from the right ventricle during ongoing ventilation (0.9 L/min, 95% CI [0.5-1.3]) with a PE% of 67% during ongoing ventilation.
Conclusions: PV-derived CO from the left ventricle showed very good agreement with TD-CO, with minimal bias, while PV-CO measurements from the right ventricle showed higher inaccuracy, likely due to anatomical differences between the ventricles.
期刊介绍:
Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.