脉络膜厚度作为鉴别周围性视网膜裂和视网膜脱离的临床标志。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Palak R Patel, Rohan A Jalalizadeh, Bradley T Smith
{"title":"脉络膜厚度作为鉴别周围性视网膜裂和视网膜脱离的临床标志。","authors":"Palak R Patel, Rohan A Jalalizadeh, Bradley T Smith","doi":"10.1177/11206721251364120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimTo determine the value of central choroidal thickness (CCT) as a clinical marker in differentiating peripheral retinoschisis (PRS) and macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (mac-on RRD).MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, eyes with PRS from January 2012 to May 2021 and mac-on RRD from January 2017 to January 2019 were identified. Macular pathology was exclusionary. CCT was classified as thin, normal, or thick for all eyes. Primary outcomes assessed the proportion of eyes within each diagnostic category with thin, normal, and thick CCT.ResultsOne-hundred and sixty eyes with PRS and 59 eyes with mac-on RRD were identified. Thick (65.6%) or normal (25.0%) CCT was noted in 90.6% of eyes with PRS, while only 9.4% had thin CCT. Thin (52.5%) or normal (30.5%) CCT was noted in 83.0% of eyes with mac-on RRD, whereas only 17.0% had thick CCT's. Thick CCT was significantly observed in PRS (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), while thin CCT was significantly observed in mac-on RRD (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).ConclusionIn the absence of known refractive error or axial length, CCT may serve as a useful and readily available diagnostic tool when attempting to distinguish between two often clinically similar retinal pathologies - PRS and mac-on RRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251364120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choroidal thickness as a clinical marker in differentiating peripheral retinoschisis and retinal detachments.\",\"authors\":\"Palak R Patel, Rohan A Jalalizadeh, Bradley T Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721251364120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AimTo determine the value of central choroidal thickness (CCT) as a clinical marker in differentiating peripheral retinoschisis (PRS) and macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (mac-on RRD).MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, eyes with PRS from January 2012 to May 2021 and mac-on RRD from January 2017 to January 2019 were identified. Macular pathology was exclusionary. CCT was classified as thin, normal, or thick for all eyes. Primary outcomes assessed the proportion of eyes within each diagnostic category with thin, normal, and thick CCT.ResultsOne-hundred and sixty eyes with PRS and 59 eyes with mac-on RRD were identified. Thick (65.6%) or normal (25.0%) CCT was noted in 90.6% of eyes with PRS, while only 9.4% had thin CCT. Thin (52.5%) or normal (30.5%) CCT was noted in 83.0% of eyes with mac-on RRD, whereas only 17.0% had thick CCT's. Thick CCT was significantly observed in PRS (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), while thin CCT was significantly observed in mac-on RRD (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).ConclusionIn the absence of known refractive error or axial length, CCT may serve as a useful and readily available diagnostic tool when attempting to distinguish between two often clinically similar retinal pathologies - PRS and mac-on RRD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11206721251364120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251364120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251364120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨中央脉络膜厚度(CCT)作为鉴别周围性视网膜裂(PRS)和黄斑上孔源性视网膜脱离(macon RRD)的临床指标的价值。方法采用横断面研究方法,选取2012年1月至2021年5月发生PRS的眼和2017年1月至2019年1月发生macon RRD的眼。黄斑病变是排他性的。全眼CCT分为薄、正常和厚三种。主要结果评估了薄、正常和厚CCT在每个诊断类别中的眼睛比例。结果共鉴定出PRS眼160只,macon RRD眼59只。90.6%的PRS患者有厚(65.6%)或正常(25.0%)的CCT,而薄(9.4%)的CCT。83.0%的mac-on RRD患者有薄CCT(52.5%)或正常CCT(30.5%),而只有17.0%的患者有厚CCT。厚CCT在PRS中明显可见(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choroidal thickness as a clinical marker in differentiating peripheral retinoschisis and retinal detachments.

AimTo determine the value of central choroidal thickness (CCT) as a clinical marker in differentiating peripheral retinoschisis (PRS) and macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (mac-on RRD).MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, eyes with PRS from January 2012 to May 2021 and mac-on RRD from January 2017 to January 2019 were identified. Macular pathology was exclusionary. CCT was classified as thin, normal, or thick for all eyes. Primary outcomes assessed the proportion of eyes within each diagnostic category with thin, normal, and thick CCT.ResultsOne-hundred and sixty eyes with PRS and 59 eyes with mac-on RRD were identified. Thick (65.6%) or normal (25.0%) CCT was noted in 90.6% of eyes with PRS, while only 9.4% had thin CCT. Thin (52.5%) or normal (30.5%) CCT was noted in 83.0% of eyes with mac-on RRD, whereas only 17.0% had thick CCT's. Thick CCT was significantly observed in PRS (p < 0.0001), while thin CCT was significantly observed in mac-on RRD (p < 0.0001).ConclusionIn the absence of known refractive error or axial length, CCT may serve as a useful and readily available diagnostic tool when attempting to distinguish between two often clinically similar retinal pathologies - PRS and mac-on RRD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信