南乔治亚州漫游信天翁种群趋势的空间隔离和副捕获风险。

IF 5.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
V Warwick-Evans, E J Pearmain, L Thorne, R A Phillips
{"title":"南乔治亚州漫游信天翁种群趋势的空间隔离和副捕获风险。","authors":"V Warwick-Evans, E J Pearmain, L Thorne, R A Phillips","doi":"10.1111/cobi.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spatial segregation in at-sea distribution is frequently observed in seabirds and can have important implications for conservation and management. Globally, many albatross and petrel populations are declining due to bycatch in fisheries. In South Georgia, the decrease in wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) differs among breeding sites, which could reflect segregation in foraging areas, leading to differing degrees of overlap with particular fishing fleets and hence unequal bycatch risk. We investigated whether spatial segregation could explain the different rates of population decline of wandering albatrosses at South Georgia. We tracked wandering albatrosses from 2 breeding sites at South Georgia, Prion Island, and Bird Island, located 50 km apart. We investigated potential causes of spatial segregation with species distribution models and by comparing wind conditions among sites. Overlap with fisheries was quantified for each population. Although overall distributions were from the Antarctic to the subtropics, virtually all wandering albatrosses from Bird Island foraged only to the west of the island group, whereas those from Prion Island foraged to the east and west. Preferred habitat characteristics were similar at both colonies, and waters to the east and west provided foraging habitat. Wind conditions when birds departed were also similar at the 2 sites. Because neither habitat specialization nor wind conditions appeared to be factors in the observed spatial segregation among colonies, this segregation likely reflected a combination of past experience, information exchange, and cultural evolution. Breeding birds from both sites overlapped most with Chinese squid jiggers, Argentinian trawlers, and South Korean set (demersal) longliners, but the spatial segregation led to a higher overlap with demersal longline, demersal trawl, and pelagic longline fisheries by wandering albatrosses at Bird Island, which could have resulted in the faster population decline. Ours is one of the first studies to demonstrate how spatial segregation may affect population dynamics, which has important implications for the conservation of this globally threatened species.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e70126"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial segregation and bycatch risk as potential drivers of population trends of wandering albatrosses at South Georgia.\",\"authors\":\"V Warwick-Evans, E J Pearmain, L Thorne, R A Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cobi.70126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spatial segregation in at-sea distribution is frequently observed in seabirds and can have important implications for conservation and management. Globally, many albatross and petrel populations are declining due to bycatch in fisheries. In South Georgia, the decrease in wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) differs among breeding sites, which could reflect segregation in foraging areas, leading to differing degrees of overlap with particular fishing fleets and hence unequal bycatch risk. We investigated whether spatial segregation could explain the different rates of population decline of wandering albatrosses at South Georgia. We tracked wandering albatrosses from 2 breeding sites at South Georgia, Prion Island, and Bird Island, located 50 km apart. We investigated potential causes of spatial segregation with species distribution models and by comparing wind conditions among sites. Overlap with fisheries was quantified for each population. Although overall distributions were from the Antarctic to the subtropics, virtually all wandering albatrosses from Bird Island foraged only to the west of the island group, whereas those from Prion Island foraged to the east and west. Preferred habitat characteristics were similar at both colonies, and waters to the east and west provided foraging habitat. Wind conditions when birds departed were also similar at the 2 sites. Because neither habitat specialization nor wind conditions appeared to be factors in the observed spatial segregation among colonies, this segregation likely reflected a combination of past experience, information exchange, and cultural evolution. Breeding birds from both sites overlapped most with Chinese squid jiggers, Argentinian trawlers, and South Korean set (demersal) longliners, but the spatial segregation led to a higher overlap with demersal longline, demersal trawl, and pelagic longline fisheries by wandering albatrosses at Bird Island, which could have resulted in the faster population decline. Ours is one of the first studies to demonstrate how spatial segregation may affect population dynamics, which has important implications for the conservation of this globally threatened species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70126\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在海鸟中经常观察到海上分布的空间隔离,这对保护和管理具有重要意义。在全球范围内,许多信天翁和海燕的数量由于渔业的附带捕捞而下降。在南乔治亚,漫游信天翁(Diomedea exulans)的减少在不同的繁殖地点有所不同,这可能反映了觅食区域的隔离,导致与特定捕鱼船队的重叠程度不同,因此副捕获风险不相等。我们调查了空间隔离是否可以解释南乔治亚州漫游信天翁种群数量下降的不同速率。我们在相距50公里的南乔治亚岛、Prion岛和Bird岛的两个繁殖地对流浪信天翁进行了跟踪。我们通过物种分布模型和比较不同地点的风力条件来研究空间隔离的潜在原因。对每个种群与渔业的重叠进行了量化。尽管总体分布从南极到亚热带,但几乎所有来自鸟岛的流浪信天翁都只在岛群的西部觅食,而来自Prion岛的信天翁则在东部和西部觅食。两个群体的偏好栖息地特征相似,东、西水域为觅食栖息地。鸟类离开时的风况在两个地点也相似。由于栖息地专业化和风力条件似乎都不是观察到的殖民地之间空间隔离的因素,这种隔离可能反映了过去经验、信息交换和文化进化的结合。两个地点的繁殖鸟类与中国鱿鱼渔船、阿根廷拖网渔船和韩国延绳钓渔船重叠最多,但由于空间隔离,雀岛信天翁与海底延绳钓、海底拖网和远洋延绳钓的重叠程度较高,这可能是导致种群下降速度更快的原因。我们的研究是第一个证明空间隔离如何影响种群动态的研究之一,这对保护这种全球濒危物种具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial segregation and bycatch risk as potential drivers of population trends of wandering albatrosses at South Georgia.

Spatial segregation in at-sea distribution is frequently observed in seabirds and can have important implications for conservation and management. Globally, many albatross and petrel populations are declining due to bycatch in fisheries. In South Georgia, the decrease in wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) differs among breeding sites, which could reflect segregation in foraging areas, leading to differing degrees of overlap with particular fishing fleets and hence unequal bycatch risk. We investigated whether spatial segregation could explain the different rates of population decline of wandering albatrosses at South Georgia. We tracked wandering albatrosses from 2 breeding sites at South Georgia, Prion Island, and Bird Island, located 50 km apart. We investigated potential causes of spatial segregation with species distribution models and by comparing wind conditions among sites. Overlap with fisheries was quantified for each population. Although overall distributions were from the Antarctic to the subtropics, virtually all wandering albatrosses from Bird Island foraged only to the west of the island group, whereas those from Prion Island foraged to the east and west. Preferred habitat characteristics were similar at both colonies, and waters to the east and west provided foraging habitat. Wind conditions when birds departed were also similar at the 2 sites. Because neither habitat specialization nor wind conditions appeared to be factors in the observed spatial segregation among colonies, this segregation likely reflected a combination of past experience, information exchange, and cultural evolution. Breeding birds from both sites overlapped most with Chinese squid jiggers, Argentinian trawlers, and South Korean set (demersal) longliners, but the spatial segregation led to a higher overlap with demersal longline, demersal trawl, and pelagic longline fisheries by wandering albatrosses at Bird Island, which could have resulted in the faster population decline. Ours is one of the first studies to demonstrate how spatial segregation may affect population dynamics, which has important implications for the conservation of this globally threatened species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信